BACKGROUND: Immunogenicity testing is required for safety assessment of biotherapeutic drugs. Because levels observed during biotherapeutic administration can approach the mg/ml range, establishing drug tolerance is significantly important for assay development. RESULTS: Three assay formats for immunogenicity assessment were tested with respect to drug tolerance: Meso Scale Discovery(®) bridging (MSDB), solid-phase extraction with acid dissociation (SPEAD) and affinity capture elution (ACE). Six biotherapeutic drugs were analyzed by the three methods; four monoclonal antibodies, one Fc fusion protein and one Pegylated protein. Overall, ACE performed best for assays involving therapeutic monoclonal antibodies and also functioned well for therapeutic proteins. Despite several advantages, the MSDB assays displayed a potentially significant hook effect. SPEAD was comparable in performance to ACE for the biotherapeutic drugs tested, but suffers the disadvantage of being reagent-intensive. CONCLUSIONS: Novel assay formats offer significant advantages for immunogenicity testing, particularly in the design of assays that are tolerant to circulating levels of the biotherapeutic drug.
BACKGROUND: Immunogenicity testing is required for safety assessment of biotherapeutic drugs. Because levels observed during biotherapeutic administration can approach the mg/ml range, establishing drug tolerance is significantly important for assay development. RESULTS: Three assay formats for immunogenicity assessment were tested with respect to drug tolerance: Meso Scale Discovery(®) bridging (MSDB), solid-phase extraction with acid dissociation (SPEAD) and affinity capture elution (ACE). Six biotherapeutic drugs were analyzed by the three methods; four monoclonal antibodies, one Fc fusion protein and one Pegylated protein. Overall, ACE performed best for assays involving therapeutic monoclonal antibodies and also functioned well for therapeutic proteins. Despite several advantages, the MSDB assays displayed a potentially significant hook effect. SPEAD was comparable in performance to ACE for the biotherapeutic drugs tested, but suffers the disadvantage of being reagent-intensive. CONCLUSIONS: Novel assay formats offer significant advantages for immunogenicity testing, particularly in the design of assays that are tolerant to circulating levels of the biotherapeutic drug.
Authors: Michael Luong; Ying Wang; Stephen P Berasi; Janet E Buhlmann; Hongying Yang; Boris Gorovits Journal: AAPS J Date: 2020-03-12 Impact factor: 4.009
Authors: Francisca Llinares-Tello; José Rosas-Gómez de Salazar; José Miguel Senabre-Gallego; Gregorio Santos-Soler; Carlos Santos-Ramírez; Esteban Salas-Heredia; Xavier Barber-Vallés; Juan Molina-García Journal: Rheumatol Int Date: 2014-05-10 Impact factor: 2.631
Authors: Yanchen Zhou; Hweixian L Penny; Mark A Kroenke; Bianca Bautista; Kelly Hainline; Lynette S Chea; Jane Parnes; Daniel T Mytych Journal: J Immunother Cancer Date: 2022-04 Impact factor: 12.469
Authors: James M Martinez; Nada Hindiyeh; Greg Anglin; Kavita Kalidas; Michael E Hodsdon; William Kielbasa; Brian A Moser; Eric M Pearlman; Sandra Garces Journal: Cephalalgia Date: 2020-04-27 Impact factor: 6.292
Authors: David W Dodick; Peter J Goadsby; Christian Lucas; Rigmor Jensen; Jennifer N Bardos; James M Martinez; Chunmei Zhou; Sheena K Aurora; Jyun Yan Yang; Robert R Conley; Tina Oakes Journal: Cephalalgia Date: 2020-02-12 Impact factor: 6.292