Literature DB >> 21110597

Build-up of the tendency to segregate auditory streams: resetting effects evoked by a single deviant tone.

Nicholas R Haywood1, Brian Roberts.   

Abstract

The tendency to hear a sequence of alternating low (L) and high (H) frequency tones as two streams can be increased by a preceding induction sequence, even one composed only of same-frequency tones. Four experiments used such an induction sequence (10 identical L tones) to promote segregation in a shorter test sequence comprising L and H tones. Previous studies have shown that the build-up of stream segregation is usually reduced greatly when a sudden change in acoustic properties distinguishes all of the induction tones from their test-sequence counterparts. Experiment 1 showed that a single deviant tone, created by altering the final inducer (in frequency, level, duration, or replacement with silence) reduced reported segregation, often substantially. Experiment 2 partially replicated this finding, using changes in temporal discrimination as a measure of streaming. Experiments 3 and 4 varied the size of a frequency change applied to the deviant tone; the extent of resetting varied with size only gradually. The results suggest that resetting begins to occur once the change is large enough to be noticeable. Since the prior inducers always remained unaltered in the deviant-tone conditions, it is proposed that a single change actively resets the build-up evoked by the induction sequence.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21110597     DOI: 10.1121/1.3488675

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  13 in total

Review 1.  Multistability in auditory stream segregation: a predictive coding view.

Authors:  István Winkler; Susan Denham; Robert Mill; Tamás M Bohm; Alexandra Bendixen
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Sequential stream segregation of voiced and unvoiced speech sounds based on fundamental frequency.

Authors:  Marion David; Mathieu Lavandier; Nicolas Grimault; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2016-12-05       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Attention effects on auditory scene analysis: insights from event-related brain potentials.

Authors:  Mona Isabel Spielmann; Erich Schröger; Sonja A Kotz; Alexandra Bendixen
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-02-20

4.  Discrimination and streaming of speech sounds based on differences in interaural and spectral cues.

Authors:  Marion David; Mathieu Lavandier; Nicolas Grimault; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 5.  Properties of auditory stream formation.

Authors:  Brian C J Moore; Hedwig E Gockel
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Investigating bottom-up auditory attention.

Authors:  Emine Merve Kaya; Mounya Elhilali
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Stimulus Pauses and Perturbations Differentially Delay or Promote the Segregation of Auditory Objects: Psychoacoustics and Modeling.

Authors:  James Rankin; Pamela J Osborn Popp; John Rinzel
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 4.677

8.  The Build-up of Auditory Stream Segregation: A Different Perspective.

Authors:  Susann Deike; Peter Heil; Martin Böckmann-Barthel; André Brechmann
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-10-31

9.  Using a staircase procedure for the objective measurement of auditory stream integration and segregation thresholds.

Authors:  Mona Spielmann; Erich Schröger; Sonja A Kotz; Thomas Pechmann; Alexandra Bendixen
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-08-20

10.  The effect of stimulus context on the buildup to stream segregation.

Authors:  Jonathan Sussman-Fort; Elyse Sussman
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 4.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.