Literature DB >> 21110579

A principal components model of soundscape perception.

Östen Axelsson1, Mats E Nilsson, Birgitta Berglund.   

Abstract

There is a need for a model that identifies underlying dimensions of soundscape perception, and which may guide measurement and improvement of soundscape quality. With the purpose to develop such a model, a listening experiment was conducted. One hundred listeners measured 50 excerpts of binaural recordings of urban outdoor soundscapes on 116 attribute scales. The average attribute scale values were subjected to principal components analysis, resulting in three components: Pleasantness, eventfulness, and familiarity, explaining 50, 18 and 6% of the total variance, respectively. The principal-component scores were correlated with physical soundscape properties, including categories of dominant sounds and acoustic variables. Soundscape excerpts dominated by technological sounds were found to be unpleasant, whereas soundscape excerpts dominated by natural sounds were pleasant, and soundscape excerpts dominated by human sounds were eventful. These relationships remained after controlling for the overall soundscape loudness (Zwicker's N(10)), which shows that 'informational' properties are substantial contributors to the perception of soundscape. The proposed principal components model provides a framework for future soundscape research and practice. In particular, it suggests which basic dimensions are necessary to measure, how to measure them by a defined set of attribute scales, and how to promote high-quality soundscapes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21110579     DOI: 10.1121/1.3493436

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  42 in total

1.  Soundtracking the Public Space: Outcomes of the Musikiosk Soundscape Intervention.

Authors:  Daniel Steele; Edda Bild; Cynthia Tarlao; Catherine Guastavino
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-05-27       Impact factor: 3.390

2.  Assessing the ecological validity of soundscape reproduction in different laboratory settings.

Authors:  Cynthia Tarlao; Daniel Steele; Catherine Guastavino
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 3.752

Review 3.  Understanding Why People Enjoy Loud Sound.

Authors:  David Welch; Guy Fremaux
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2017-10-10

4.  Learning autonomy in two or three steps: linking open-ended development, authority, and agency to motivation.

Authors:  Tjeerd C Andringa; Kirsten A van den Bosch; Carla Vlaskamp
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-10-22

5.  Categorization of natural dynamic audiovisual scenes.

Authors:  Olli Rummukainen; Jenni Radun; Toni Virtanen; Ville Pulkki
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-01       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Tinnitus what and where: an ecological framework.

Authors:  Grant D Searchfield
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2014-12-15       Impact factor: 4.003

7.  Perception of the acoustic environment during COVID-19 lockdown in Argentina.

Authors:  Ana L Maggi; Jimena Muratore; Sara Gaetán; Mauricio F Zalazar-Jaime; Diego Evin; Jorge Pérez Villalobo; María Hinalaf
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-06       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  How pleasant sounds promote and annoying sounds impede health: a cognitive approach.

Authors:  Tjeerd C Andringa; J Jolie L Lanser
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2013-04-08       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Chatty maps: constructing sound maps of urban areas from social media data.

Authors:  Luca Maria Aiello; Rossano Schifanella; Daniele Quercia; Francesco Aletta
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2016-03-23       Impact factor: 2.963

10.  Acoustic, Visual and Spatial Indicators for the Description of the Soundscape of Waterfront Areas with and without Road Traffic Flow.

Authors:  Virginia Puyana Romero; Luigi Maffei; Giovanni Brambilla; Giuseppe Ciaburro
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.