PURPOSE: The effect of various doses of methylphenidate on the binding of [(123)I]iodobenzamide ([(123)I]IBZM) to the rat D(2) receptor was assessed using small animal SPECT. METHODS: D(2) receptor binding was measured at baseline and after pretreatment with various doses of methylphenidate. For baseline and methylphenidate challenge, striatal equilibrium ratios (V(3)″) were computed as an estimation of the binding potential. RESULTS: After methylphenidate, striatal V(3)″ was 1.61 ± 0.61 (mean ± SD; 0.3 mg/kg), 0.91 ± 0.44 (3 mg/kg), 1.01 ± 0.44 (10 mg/kg), 0.91 ± 0.34 (30 mg/kg) and 0.99 ± 0.51 (60 mg/kg). Baseline values amounted to 1.73 ± 0.48, 1.32 ± 0.35, 1.50 ± 0.27, 1.82 ± 0.55 and 1.66 ± 0.41, respectively. Differences between baseline and methylphenidate were significant for the doses 3, 10, 30 and 60 mg/kg, whereas no significant difference was obtained for 0.3 mg/kg methylphenidate. Between-group differences of percentage reduction of D(2) receptor binding were only significant for the groups pretreated with 0.3 and 30 mg/kg methylphenidate, respectively. CONCLUSION: Methylphenidate between 0.3 and 60 mg/kg decreased D(2) receptor binding with a maximum reduction after 30 mg/kg. As no between-group differences were evident between the groups pretreated with 3, 10, 30 and 60 mg/kg, it may be inferred that doses ≥ 3 mg/kg were sufficient to induce maximum dopamine concentration in the synaptic cleft. Further investigations are needed in order to clarify whether the variation between subjects can be accounted for by different synaptic mechanisms at the presynaptic binding site.
PURPOSE: The effect of various doses of methylphenidate on the binding of [(123)I]iodobenzamide ([(123)I]IBZM) to the rat D(2) receptor was assessed using small animal SPECT. METHODS: D(2) receptor binding was measured at baseline and after pretreatment with various doses of methylphenidate. For baseline and methylphenidate challenge, striatal equilibrium ratios (V(3)″) were computed as an estimation of the binding potential. RESULTS: After methylphenidate, striatal V(3)″ was 1.61 ± 0.61 (mean ± SD; 0.3 mg/kg), 0.91 ± 0.44 (3 mg/kg), 1.01 ± 0.44 (10 mg/kg), 0.91 ± 0.34 (30 mg/kg) and 0.99 ± 0.51 (60 mg/kg). Baseline values amounted to 1.73 ± 0.48, 1.32 ± 0.35, 1.50 ± 0.27, 1.82 ± 0.55 and 1.66 ± 0.41, respectively. Differences between baseline and methylphenidate were significant for the doses 3, 10, 30 and 60 mg/kg, whereas no significant difference was obtained for 0.3 mg/kg methylphenidate. Between-group differences of percentage reduction of D(2) receptor binding were only significant for the groups pretreated with 0.3 and 30 mg/kg methylphenidate, respectively. CONCLUSION:Methylphenidate between 0.3 and 60 mg/kg decreased D(2) receptor binding with a maximum reduction after 30 mg/kg. As no between-group differences were evident between the groups pretreated with 3, 10, 30 and 60 mg/kg, it may be inferred that doses ≥ 3 mg/kg were sufficient to induce maximum dopamine concentration in the synaptic cleft. Further investigations are needed in order to clarify whether the variation between subjects can be accounted for by different synaptic mechanisms at the presynaptic binding site.
Authors: Andreas K Wirrwar; Susanne Nikolaus; Nils U Schramm; Shahram Arkian; Mathias Cohnen; Hans-Wilhelm Müller Journal: Z Med Phys Date: 2005 Impact factor: 4.820
Authors: N D Volkow; G Wang; J S Fowler; J Logan; M Gerasimov; L Maynard; Y Ding; S J Gatley; A Gifford; D Franceschi Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2001-01-15 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: J P Seibyl; S W Woods; S S Zoghbi; R M Baldwin; H M Dey; A W Goddard; Y Zea-Ponce; G Zubal; M Germine; E O Smith Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 1992-11 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Susanne Nikolaus; Markus Beu; Angelica Maria De Souza Silva; Joseph P Huston; Hubertus Hautzel; Owen Y Chao; Christina Antke; Hans-Wilhelm Müller Journal: Front Behav Neurosci Date: 2014-12-17 Impact factor: 3.558
Authors: Susanne Nikolaus; Markus Beu; Hubertus Hautzel; Angelica M De Souza Silva; Christina Antke; Andreas Wirrwar; Joseph P Huston; Hans-Wilhelm Müller Journal: Nucl Med Commun Date: 2013-12 Impact factor: 1.690
Authors: Monique R Bernsen; Pieter E B Vaissier; Roel Van Holen; Jan Booij; Freek J Beekman; Marion de Jong Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2014-05 Impact factor: 9.236