PURPOSE: Reducing dosing demands of medications generally increases adherence, although this relationship has not been demonstrated with the once-monthly oral bisphosphonates (BP). The study aim is to test whether switching from once-weekly BPs to once-monthly BPs improves adherence and fracture risk. METHODS: This is an interrupted times-series analysis of new users of once-weekly BPs in a nationwide administrative health database from 2003 to 2007. Participants include 1835 individuals who switched to once-monthly BPs and two propensity-matched comparator groups: 1835 individuals who switched to a different once-weekly BP, and 1835 who did not switch. We measured changes in adequate adherence pre- and post-switch as monthly medication possession ratio >0.80, and calculated incidence rate ratios (IRR) of osteoporotic fractures. RESULTS: All study groups experienced major adherence failure in the first year of therapy: the proportion of adequate adherers was 42% among once-monthly switchers, 47% among once-weekly switchers, and 37% among nonswitchers. However, the once-monthly switch was associated with less adherence failure (4% fewer adherers per month pre-switch vs. 1% fewer adherers per month post-switch, p<0.000). There was no statistically significant change in adherence rates for the other groups. We did not detect significantly reduced fracture risk with once-monthly switch: 1 year post-switch, the fracture incidence risk ratios for once-monthly switchers relative to once-weekly switchers were IRR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.50-1.36, and IRR 0.90, 95% CI: 0.54-1.49, relative to nonswitchers). CONCLUSIONS: Reducing the dosing demands of oral bisphosphonates from once-weekly to once-monthly decreased adherence failure but had an uncertain impact on fracture risk.
PURPOSE: Reducing dosing demands of medications generally increases adherence, although this relationship has not been demonstrated with the once-monthly oral bisphosphonates (BP). The study aim is to test whether switching from once-weekly BPs to once-monthly BPs improves adherence and fracture risk. METHODS: This is an interrupted times-series analysis of new users of once-weekly BPs in a nationwide administrative health database from 2003 to 2007. Participants include 1835 individuals who switched to once-monthly BPs and two propensity-matched comparator groups: 1835 individuals who switched to a different once-weekly BP, and 1835 who did not switch. We measured changes in adequate adherence pre- and post-switch as monthly medication possession ratio >0.80, and calculated incidence rate ratios (IRR) of osteoporotic fractures. RESULTS: All study groups experienced major adherence failure in the first year of therapy: the proportion of adequate adherers was 42% among once-monthly switchers, 47% among once-weekly switchers, and 37% among nonswitchers. However, the once-monthly switch was associated with less adherence failure (4% fewer adherers per month pre-switch vs. 1% fewer adherers per month post-switch, p<0.000). There was no statistically significant change in adherence rates for the other groups. We did not detect significantly reduced fracture risk with once-monthly switch: 1 year post-switch, the fracture incidence risk ratios for once-monthly switchers relative to once-weekly switchers were IRR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.50-1.36, and IRR 0.90, 95% CI: 0.54-1.49, relative to nonswitchers). CONCLUSIONS: Reducing the dosing demands of oral bisphosphonates from once-weekly to once-monthly decreased adherence failure but had an uncertain impact on fracture risk.
Authors: Paul D Miller; Michael R McClung; Liviu Macovei; Jacob A Stakkestad; Marjorie Luckey; Bernard Bonvoisin; Jean-Yves Reginster; Robert R Recker; Claire Hughes; E Michael Lewiecki; Dieter Felsenberg; Pierre D Delmas; David L Kendler; Michael A Bolognese; Nicole Mairon; Cyrus Cooper Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2005-03-14 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: Susan E Andrade; Jerry H Gurwitz; K Arnold Chan; James G Donahue; Arne Beck; Myde Boles; Diana S M Buist; Michael Goodman; Andrea Z LaCroix; T R Levin; Richard Platt Journal: J Clin Epidemiol Date: 2002-03 Impact factor: 6.437
Authors: S Patel; J T Kwan; E McCloskey; G McGee; G Thomas; D Johnson; R Wills; L Ogunremi; J Barron Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2001-10 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: P D Delmas; R R Recker; C H Chesnut; A Skag; J A Stakkestad; R Emkey; J Gilbride; R C Schimmer; C Christiansen Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2004-04-08 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: Robert A Yood; Srinivas Emani; John I Reed; Barbara Edelman Lewis; Mary Charpentier; Eva Lydick Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2003-09-19 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: Charles H Chesnut; Arne Skag; Claus Christiansen; Robert Recker; Jacob A Stakkestad; Arne Hoiseth; Dieter Felsenberg; Hermann Huss; Jennifer Gilbride; Ralph C Schimmer; Pierre D Delmas Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2004-03-29 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: Marsha A Raebel; Julie Schmittdiel; Andrew J Karter; Jennifer L Konieczny; John F Steiner Journal: Med Care Date: 2013-08 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Helena Parente Vieira; Ingrid Almeida Leite; Thayga Maria Araújo Sampaio; Juliane Dos Anjos de Paula; Ankilma do Nascimento Andrade; Luiz Carlos de Abreu; Vitor E Valenti; Flavia C Goulart; Fernando Adami Journal: Int Arch Med Date: 2013-05-24
Authors: N Freemantle; S Satram-Hoang; E-T Tang; P Kaur; D Macarios; S Siddhanti; J Borenstein; D L Kendler Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2011-09-17 Impact factor: 4.507