Literature DB >> 21107697

Ku70 and Rad51 vary in their importance for the repair of doxorubicin- versus etoposide-induced DNA damage.

Ilona Schonn1, Jana Hennesen, Dorothee C Dartsch.   

Abstract

For DNA targeting anticancer drugs, cellular DNA repair mechanisms may cause resistance and hamper the therapeutic outcome. DNA damage induced by topoisomerase IIα inhibitors like etoposide and anthracyclines, which are a mainstay of cancer therapy, is also repaired in many cell types, but the impact and precise mechanisms of this repair are still obscure. To investigate the DNA damage response of human adenocarcinoma HT29-cells to doxorubicin and to compare the involvement of Ku70 and Rad51 in the repair of doxorubicin- versus etoposide-induced DNA damage, we assessed cell cycle distribution and cell death, DNA damage, proteins relevant for repair by homologous recombination and non-homologous end-joining, and clonogenicity following exposure to doxorubicin at clinically achievable concentrations. Also, we assessed changes in the repair kinetics after siRNA-mediated attenuation of Ku70 or Rad51 expression. We found that exposure to doxorubicin for 24 h induced a substantial amount of DNA damage that was largely repaired when doxorubicin was removed and the cells were maintained in drug-free medium. Nevertheless, a pronounced G(2)/M arrest occurred at times when repair was maximal. This was followed by a distinct increase in cell death and loss of clonogenicity. In this regard, responses to doxorubicin and etoposide were similar. However, distinct differences in the repair process following doxorubicin versus etoposide were seen in concentration dependency, time-course and requirement of Ku70 and Rad51 proteins. In spite of the shared molecular target of doxorubicin and etoposide, DNA lesions induced by these compounds are repaired differently.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21107697     DOI: 10.1007/s10495-010-0564-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Apoptosis        ISSN: 1360-8185            Impact factor:   4.677


  8 in total

Review 1.  Therapeutic applications of histone deacetylase inhibitors in sarcoma.

Authors:  Fan Tang; Edwin Choy; Chongqi Tu; Francis Hornicek; Zhenfeng Duan
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  2017-07-06       Impact factor: 12.111

2.  Targeting nucleolin for better survival in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

Authors:  N Jain; H Zhu; T Khashab; Q Ye; B George; R Mathur; R K Singh; Z Berkova; J F Wise; F K Braun; X Wang; K Patel; Z Y Xu-Monette; J Courty; K H Young; L Sehgal; F Samaniego
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2017-07-10       Impact factor: 11.528

Review 3.  Cardiotoxicity of anticancer treatments.

Authors:  Michael S Ewer; Steven M Ewer
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2015-05-12       Impact factor: 32.419

4.  Expression and regulation of RAD51 mediate cellular responses to chemotherapeutics.

Authors:  Zhengguan Yang; Alan S Waldman; Michael D Wyatt
Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  2011-12-24       Impact factor: 5.858

5.  Biological indicators of chemoresistance: an ex vivo analysis of γH2AX and p53 expression in feline injection-site sarcomas.

Authors:  Yike Bing; Zacharie Wund; Tina Abratte; Lucia Borlle; Susie Kang; Teresa Southard; Kelly R Hume
Journal:  Cancer Cell Int       Date:  2018-11-22       Impact factor: 5.722

6.  A small molecule inhibitor of human RAD51 potentiates breast cancer cell killing by therapeutic agents in mouse xenografts.

Authors:  Fei Huang; Alexander V Mazin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-27       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  The prognostic value of BRCA1 promoter methylation in early stage triple negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Priyanka Sharma; Shane R Stecklein; Bruce F Kimler; Geetika Sethi; Brian K Petroff; Teresa A Phillips; Ossama W Tawfik; Andrew K Godwin; Roy A Jensen
Journal:  J Cancer Ther Res       Date:  2014-03-19

8.  The anticancer effects of MPT0G211, a novel HDAC6 inhibitor, combined with chemotherapeutic agents in human acute leukemia cells.

Authors:  Huang-Ju Tu; Yi-Jyun Lin; Min-Wu Chao; Ting-Yi Sung; Yi-Wen Wu; Yi-Ying Chen; Mei-Hsiang Lin; Jing-Ping Liou; Shiow-Lin Pan; Chia-Ron Yang
Journal:  Clin Epigenetics       Date:  2018-12-29       Impact factor: 6.551

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.