Literature DB >> 21107642

Engineering industrial Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains for xylose fermentation and comparison for switchgrass conversion.

Ronald E Hector1, Bruce S Dien, Michael A Cotta, Nasib Qureshi.   

Abstract

Saccharomyces' physiology and fermentation-related properties vary broadly among industrial strains used to ferment glucose. How genetic background affects xylose metabolism in recombinant Saccharomyces strains has not been adequately explored. In this study, six industrial strains of varied genetic background were engineered to ferment xylose by stable integration of the xylose reductase, xylitol dehydrogenase, and xylulokinase genes. Aerobic growth rates on xylose were 0.04-0.17 h(-1). Fermentation of xylose and glucose/xylose mixtures also showed a wide range of performance between strains. During xylose fermentation, xylose consumption rates were 0.17-0.31 g/l/h, with ethanol yields 0.18-0.27 g/g. Yields of ethanol and the metabolite xylitol were positively correlated, indicating that all of the strains had downstream limitations to xylose metabolism. The better-performing engineered and parental strains were compared for conversion of alkaline pretreated switchgrass to ethanol. The engineered strains produced 13-17% more ethanol than the parental control strains because of their ability to ferment xylose.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21107642     DOI: 10.1007/s10295-010-0896-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol        ISSN: 1367-5435            Impact factor:   3.346


  27 in total

1.  High activity of xylose reductase and xylitol dehydrogenase improves xylose fermentation by recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Kaisa Karhumaa; Romain Fromanger; Bärbel Hahn-Hägerdal; Marie-F Gorwa-Grauslund
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2006-09-15       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  Bioethanol production from corn stover using aqueous ammonia pretreatment and two-phase simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (TPSSF).

Authors:  Xuan Li; Tae Hyun Kim; Nhuan P Nghiem
Journal:  Bioresour Technol       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 9.642

Review 3.  Hemicelluloses for fuel ethanol: A review.

Authors:  F M Gírio; C Fonseca; F Carvalheiro; L C Duarte; S Marques; R Bogel-Łukasik
Journal:  Bioresour Technol       Date:  2010-02-18       Impact factor: 9.642

4.  Evolutionary engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for anaerobic growth on xylose.

Authors:  Marco Sonderegger; Uwe Sauer
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Suitability of replacement markers for functional analysis studies in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  F Baganz; A Hayes; D Marren; D C Gardner; S G Oliver
Journal:  Yeast       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 3.239

Review 6.  Towards industrial pentose-fermenting yeast strains.

Authors:  Bärbel Hahn-Hägerdal; Kaisa Karhumaa; César Fonseca; Isabel Spencer-Martins; Marie F Gorwa-Grauslund
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2007-02-09       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  Application of the reuseable, KanMX selectable marker to industrial yeast: construction and evaluation of heterothallic wine strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, possessing minimal foreign DNA sequences.

Authors:  Michelle E Walker; Jennie M Gardner; Andrea Vystavelova; Colin McBryde; Miguel de Barros Lopes; Vladimir Jiranek
Journal:  FEMS Yeast Res       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.796

8.  Fermentation of mixed glucose-xylose substrates by engineered strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: role of the coenzyme specificity of xylose reductase, and effect of glucose on xylose utilization.

Authors:  Stefan Krahulec; Barbara Petschacher; Michael Wallner; Karin Longus; Mario Klimacek; Bernd Nidetzky
Journal:  Microb Cell Fact       Date:  2010-03-10       Impact factor: 5.328

9.  Tolerance and adaptation of ethanologenic yeasts to lignocellulosic inhibitory compounds.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Keating; Chris Panganiban; Shawn D Mansfield
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  2006-04-20       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 10.  Yeast metabolic engineering for hemicellulosic ethanol production.

Authors:  J H Van Vleet; T W Jeffries
Journal:  Curr Opin Biotechnol       Date:  2009-06-21       Impact factor: 9.740

View more
  24 in total

Review 1.  Emerging strategies for engineering microbial communities.

Authors:  Ryan Tsoi; Zhuojun Dai; Lingchong You
Journal:  Biotechnol Adv       Date:  2019-03-15       Impact factor: 14.227

2.  Enhanced expression of genes involved in initial xylose metabolism and the oxidative pentose phosphate pathway in the improved xylose-utilizing Saccharomyces cerevisiae through evolutionary engineering.

Authors:  Jian Zha; Minghua Shen; Menglong Hu; Hao Song; Yingjin Yuan
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 3.346

3.  Heterologous secretory expression of β-glucosidase from Thermoascus aurantiacus in industrial Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains.

Authors:  Izat Smekenov; Marzhan Bakhtambayeva; Kudaybergen Bissenbayev; Murat Saparbayev; Sabira Taipakova; Amangeldy K Bissenbaev
Journal:  Braz J Microbiol       Date:  2019-11-28       Impact factor: 2.476

4.  Triacetic acid lactone production in industrial Saccharomyces yeast strains.

Authors:  Lauren P Saunders; Michael J Bowman; Jeffrey A Mertens; Nancy A Da Silva; Ronald E Hector
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2015-02-15       Impact factor: 3.346

5.  A Synthetic Hybrid Promoter for Xylose-Regulated Control of Gene Expression in Saccharomyces Yeasts.

Authors:  Ronald E Hector; Jeffrey A Mertens
Journal:  Mol Biotechnol       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 2.695

6.  Model-based transcriptome engineering promotes a fermentative transcriptional state in yeast.

Authors:  Drew G Michael; Ezekiel J Maier; Holly Brown; Stacey R Gish; Christopher Fiore; Randall H Brown; Michael R Brent
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Hydrothermal pretreatment of sugarcane bagasse using response surface methodology improves digestibility and ethanol production by SSF.

Authors:  Sandra Helena da Cruz; Bruce S Dien; Nancy N Nichols; Badal C Saha; Michael A Cotta
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2011-11-12       Impact factor: 3.346

8.  Performance of xylose-fermenting yeasts in oat and soybean hulls hydrolysate and improvement of ethanol production using immobilized cell systems.

Authors:  Paulo Roberto Dall Cortivo; Luiza Fichtner Aydos; Lilian Raquel Hickert; Carlos Augusto Rosa; Ronald E Hector; Jeffrey A Mertens; Marco Antônio Záchia Ayub
Journal:  Biotechnol Lett       Date:  2021-09-04       Impact factor: 2.461

9.  Harnessing genetic diversity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae for fermentation of xylose in hydrolysates of alkaline hydrogen peroxide-pretreated biomass.

Authors:  Trey K Sato; Tongjun Liu; Lucas S Parreiras; Daniel L Williams; Dana J Wohlbach; Benjamin D Bice; Irene M Ong; Rebecca J Breuer; Li Qin; Donald Busalacchi; Shweta Deshpande; Chris Daum; Audrey P Gasch; David B Hodge
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Influence of genetic background of engineered xylose-fermenting industrial Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains for ethanol production from lignocellulosic hydrolysates.

Authors:  Daiane Dias Lopes; Carlos Augusto Rosa; Ronald E Hector; Bruce S Dien; Jeffrey A Mertens; Marco Antônio Záchia Ayub
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2017-09-11       Impact factor: 3.346

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.