BACKGROUND: Umbilical repositioning is a main step in performing abdominoplasty. The surgical aims are minimal visible scars and a natural-appearing result. Reported techniques do not completely satisfy the aesthetic targets for all types of patients. A previous study reported a versatile technique for umbilicoplasty based on an elliptical vertical incision of the umbilical skin and a double opposing "Y" incision on the abdominal flap to create a new umbilicus. This report describes the long-term results with this technique. METHODS: A total of 111 abdominoplasties were performed. Patient satisfaction and postoperative results were evaluated over a 5-year follow-up period. A modified 5-ml syringe was used to assess the depth and volume of the umbilical stalk. Depth value variations were statistically compared using the Wilcoxon test. RESULTS: For all the patients, a three-dimensional umbilicus with an adequate depression was created. In four cases, deepithelialization of the umbilical skin occurred. After 1 postoperative year, no significant changes in umbilical shape, dimension, depth, or appearance were observed. After 5 years, no significant changes in shape or appearance were observed. The cicatricial umbilical stenosis occurrence was 4.5%. A small significant decrease in umbilical depth was noted. Overall, the results remained satisfying at this writing. CONCLUSIONS: The reported technique is easy to learn, simple to perform, and stable over time. It gives a natural depth appearance, ensures optimal position, pulls scars deeply, and allows achievement of different shapes according to the patient's habitus.
BACKGROUND: Umbilical repositioning is a main step in performing abdominoplasty. The surgical aims are minimal visible scars and a natural-appearing result. Reported techniques do not completely satisfy the aesthetic targets for all types of patients. A previous study reported a versatile technique for umbilicoplasty based on an elliptical vertical incision of the umbilical skin and a double opposing "Y" incision on the abdominal flap to create a new umbilicus. This report describes the long-term results with this technique. METHODS: A total of 111 abdominoplasties were performed. Patient satisfaction and postoperative results were evaluated over a 5-year follow-up period. A modified 5-ml syringe was used to assess the depth and volume of the umbilical stalk. Depth value variations were statistically compared using the Wilcoxon test. RESULTS: For all the patients, a three-dimensional umbilicus with an adequate depression was created. In four cases, deepithelialization of the umbilical skin occurred. After 1 postoperative year, no significant changes in umbilical shape, dimension, depth, or appearance were observed. After 5 years, no significant changes in shape or appearance were observed. The cicatricial umbilical stenosis occurrence was 4.5%. A small significant decrease in umbilical depth was noted. Overall, the results remained satisfying at this writing. CONCLUSIONS: The reported technique is easy to learn, simple to perform, and stable over time. It gives a natural depth appearance, ensures optimal position, pulls scars deeply, and allows achievement of different shapes according to the patient's habitus.