Literature DB >> 21107471

A high-throughput microfluidic assay to study neurite response to growth factor gradients.

Chandrasekhar R Kothapalli1, Ed van Veen, Sarra de Valence, Seok Chung, Ioannis K Zervantonakis, Frank B Gertler, Roger D Kamm.   

Abstract

Studying neurite guidance by diffusible or substrate bound gradients is challenging with current techniques. In this study, we present the design, fabrication and utility of a microfluidic device to study neurite guidance under chemogradients. Experimental and computational studies demonstrated the establishment of a steep gradient of guidance cue within 30 min and stable for up to 48 h. The gradient was found to be insensitive to external perturbations such as media change and movement of device. The effects of netrin-1 (0.1-10 µg mL(-1)) and brain pulp (0.1 µL mL(-1)) were evaluated for their chemoattractive potential on neurite turning, while slit-2 (62.5 or 250 ng mL(-1)) was studied for its chemorepellant properties. Hippocampal or dorsal root ganglion (DRG) neurons were seeded into a micro-channel and packed onto the surface of a 3D collagen gel. Neurites grew into the matrix in three dimensions, and a gradient of guidance cue was created orthogonal to the direction of neurite growth to impact guidance. The average turning angle of each neurite was measured and averaged across multiple devices cultured under similar conditions to quantify the effect of guidance cue gradient. Significant positive turning towards gradient was measured in the presence of brain pulp and netrin-1 (1 µg mL(-1)), relative to control cultures which received no external guidance cue (p < 0.001). Netrin-1 released from transfected fibroblasts had the most positive turning effect of all the chemoattractive cues tested (p < 0.001). Slit-2 exhibited strong chemorepellant characteristics on both hippocampal and DRG neurite guidance at 250 ng mL(-1) concentration. Slit-2 also showed similar behavior on DRG neuron invasion into 3D collagen gel (p < 0.01 relative to control cultures). Taken together, the results suggest the utility of this microfluidic device to generate stable chemogradients for studying neurobiology, cell migration and proliferation, matrix remodeling and co-cultures with other cell lines, with potential applications in cancer biology, tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21107471     DOI: 10.1039/c0lc00240b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lab Chip        ISSN: 1473-0189            Impact factor:   6.799


  50 in total

1.  Rapid formation of size-controlled three dimensional hetero-cell aggregates using micro-rotation flow for spheroid study.

Authors:  Hiroki Ota; Taiga Kodama; Norihisa Miki
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2011-07-25       Impact factor: 2.800

2.  A microfluidic platform for controlled biochemical stimulation of twin neuronal networks.

Authors:  Emilia Biffi; Francesco Piraino; Alessandra Pedrocchi; Gianfranco B Fiore; Giancarlo Ferrigno; Alberto Redaelli; Andrea Menegon; Marco Rasponi
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2012-04-03       Impact factor: 2.800

Review 3.  Microfluidic devices for cell cultivation and proliferation.

Authors:  Masoomeh Tehranirokh; Abbas Z Kouzani; Paul S Francis; Jagat R Kanwar
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 2.800

Review 4.  Investigation of nerve injury through microfluidic devices.

Authors:  Rezina Siddique; Nitish Thakor
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 5.  Advances in ex vivo models and lab-on-a-chip devices for neural tissue engineering.

Authors:  Sahba Mobini; Young Hye Song; Michaela W McCrary; Christine E Schmidt
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2018-05-11       Impact factor: 12.479

6.  A microfluidic device to investigate axon targeting by limited numbers of purified cortical projection neuron subtypes.

Authors:  Suzanne Tharin; Chandrasekhar R Kothapalli; Pembe Hande Ozdinler; Lincoln Pasquina; Seok Chung; Johanna Varner; Sarra DeValence; Roger Kamm; Jeffrey D Macklis
Journal:  Integr Biol (Camb)       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 2.192

Review 7.  New perspectives on neuronal development via microfluidic environments.

Authors:  Larry J Millet; Martha U Gillette
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2012-09-29       Impact factor: 13.837

Review 8.  Assessing drug response in engineered brain microenvironments.

Authors:  Kinsley M Tate; Jennifer M Munson
Journal:  Brain Res Bull       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 4.077

9.  Structural and molecular micropatterning of dual hydrogel constructs for neural growth models using photochemical strategies.

Authors:  Elaine L Horn-Ranney; J Lowry Curley; Gary C Catig; Renee M Huval; Michael J Moore
Journal:  Biomed Microdevices       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.838

10.  Simultaneous or Sequential Orthogonal Gradient Formation in a 3D Cell Culture Microfluidic Platform.

Authors:  Sebastien G M Uzel; Ovid C Amadi; Taylor M Pearl; Richard T Lee; Peter T C So; Roger D Kamm
Journal:  Small       Date:  2015-11-30       Impact factor: 13.281

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.