Literature DB >> 21107020

Concentrations of EpCAM ectodomain as found in sera of cancer patients do not significantly impact redirected lysis and T-cell activation by EpCAM/CD3-bispecific BiTE antibody MT110.

Silke Petsch1, Olivier Gires, Dominik Rüttinger, Sabine Denzel, Sandra Lippold, Patrick A Baeuerle, Andreas Wolf.   

Abstract

Ectodomains of target antigens for antibody-based therapies can be shed from the target cell surface and found in sera of patients. Shed ectodomains of therapeutic targets not only pose the risk of sequestering therapeutic antibodies but, in a multimeric form, of triggering T cell activation by bispecific antibodies binding to CD3 on T cells. Recently, epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM) has been shown to be activated by release of its ectodomain, called EpEX. Here, we show that only very low amounts of EpEX are detectable in sera of cancer patients. Among 100 cancer patient samples tested, only 17 (17%) showed serum levels of EpEX in excess of 0.05 ng/ml with highest EpEX concentrations of 5.29, 1.37 and 0.52 ng/ml. A recombinant form of human EpEX (recEpEX) was produced to assess its possible effect on redirected lysis and T cell activation by EpCAM/CD3-bispecific BiTE antibody MT110, currently being tested in patients with solid tumor malignancies. RecEpEX had a very minor effect on redirected lysis by MT110 with an approximate IC 50 value of 3,000 ng/ml, which is a concentration close to three orders of magnitude higher than the highest EpEX concentration found in cancer patients. Concentrations of 30 ng/ml EpEX in combination with 250 ng/ml MT110 were minimally required to induce a detectable activation of CD4 (+) and CD8 (+) T cells. We conclude that soluble EpEX in sera of cancer patients is unlikely to pose an issue for the efficacy or safety of MT110, and perhaps other antibodies binding to N-terminal epitopes of EpCAM.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21107020      PMCID: PMC3038009          DOI: 10.4161/mabs.3.1.14193

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  MAbs        ISSN: 1942-0862            Impact factor:   5.857


  25 in total

1.  Mode of cytotoxic action of T cell-engaging BiTE antibody MT110.

Authors:  Cornelia Haas; Eva Krinner; Klaus Brischwein; Patrick Hoffmann; Ralf Lutterbüse; Bernd Schlereth; Peter Kufer; Patrick A Baeuerle
Journal:  Immunobiology       Date:  2009-01-20       Impact factor: 3.144

2.  Nuclear signalling by tumour-associated antigen EpCAM.

Authors:  Dorothea Maetzel; Sabine Denzel; Brigitte Mack; Martin Canis; Philip Went; Michael Benk; Cuong Kieu; Peer Papior; Patrick A Baeuerle; Markus Munz; Olivier Gires
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2009-01-11       Impact factor: 28.824

Review 3.  Development and approval of the trifunctional antibody catumaxomab (anti-EpCAM x anti-CD3) as a targeted cancer immunotherapy.

Authors:  Diane Seimetz; Horst Lindhofer; Carsten Bokemeyer
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  2010-03-27       Impact factor: 12.111

4.  EpCAM nuclear localization identifies aggressive thyroid cancer and is a marker for poor prognosis.

Authors:  Ranju Ralhan; Jun Cao; Terence Lim; Christina Macmillan; Jeremy L Freeman; Paul G Walfish
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-06-25       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 5.  Cancer stem cells in solid tumours: accumulating evidence and unresolved questions.

Authors:  Jane E Visvader; Geoffrey J Lindeman
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2008-09-11       Impact factor: 60.716

6.  Potent control of tumor growth by CEA/CD3-bispecific single-chain antibody constructs that are not competitively inhibited by soluble CEA.

Authors:  Ralf Lutterbuese; Tobias Raum; Roman Kischel; Petra Lutterbuese; Bernd Schlereth; Evelyne Schaller; Susanne Mangold; Doris Rau; Petra Meier; Peter A Kiener; Kathy Mulgrew; Michael D Oberst; Scott A Hammond; Patrick A Baeuerle; Peter Kufer
Journal:  J Immunother       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 4.456

Review 7.  The emerging role of EpCAM in cancer and stem cell signaling.

Authors:  Markus Munz; Patrick A Baeuerle; Olivier Gires
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2009-07-07       Impact factor: 12.701

8.  Initial activation of EpCAM cleavage via cell-to-cell contact.

Authors:  Sabine Denzel; Dorothea Maetzel; Brigitte Mack; Carola Eggert; Gabriele Bärr; Olivier Gires
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2009-11-19       Impact factor: 4.430

9.  A genome-wide expression analysis identifies a network of EpCAM-induced cell cycle regulators.

Authors:  K Maaser; J Borlak
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2008-10-28       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 10.  Value and limitations of measuring HER-2 extracellular domain in the serum of breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Alexandra F Leary; Wedad M Hanna; Marc J van de Vijver; Frederique Penault-Llorca; Josef Rüschoff; Robert Y Osamura; Michael Bilous; Mitch Dowsett
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-03-02       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  13 in total

Review 1.  Immunotherapy of hepatocellular carcinoma using chimeric antigen receptors and bispecific antibodies.

Authors:  Sayed Shahabuddin Hoseini; Nai-Kong V Cheung
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2017-04-17       Impact factor: 8.679

2.  In silico design and validation of high-affinity RNA aptamers targeting epithelial cellular adhesion molecule dimers.

Authors:  David R Bell; Jeffrey K Weber; Wang Yin; Tien Huynh; Wei Duan; Ruhong Zhou
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-03-31       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Soluble EpCAM levels in ascites correlate with positive cytology and neutralize catumaxomab activity in vitro.

Authors:  Andreas Seeber; Agnieszka Martowicz; Gilbert Spizzo; Thomas Buratti; Peter Obrist; Dominic Fong; Guenther Gastl; Gerold Untergasser
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 4.430

4.  Detection of soluble EpCAM (sEpCAM) in malignant ascites predicts poor overall survival in patients treated with catumaxomab.

Authors:  Andreas Seeber; Ioana Braicu; Gerold Untergasser; Mani Nassir; Dominic Fong; Laura Botta; Guenther Gastl; Heidi Fiegl; Alain Zeimet; Jalid Sehouli; Gilbert Spizzo
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2015-09-22

Review 5.  Selecting Targets for Tumor Imaging: An Overview of Cancer-Associated Membrane Proteins.

Authors:  Martin C Boonstra; Susanna W L de Geus; Hendrica A J M Prevoo; Lukas J A C Hawinkels; Cornelis J H van de Velde; Peter J K Kuppen; Alexander L Vahrmeijer; Cornelis F M Sier
Journal:  Biomark Cancer       Date:  2016-09-27

6.  EpCAM proteolysis: new fragments with distinct functions?

Authors:  Ulrike Schnell; Jeroen Kuipers; Ben N G Giepmans
Journal:  Biosci Rep       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 3.840

7.  Targeting EpCAM (CD326) for immunotherapy in hepatoblastoma.

Authors:  Sorin Armeanu-Ebinger; Alexander Hoh; Julia Wenz; Joerg Fuchs
Journal:  Oncoimmunology       Date:  2013-01-01       Impact factor: 8.110

8.  Fully human HER2/cluster of differentiation 3 bispecific antibody triggers potent and specific cytotoxicity of T lymphocytes against breast cancer.

Authors:  Yan Zhou; Lan-Tu Gou; Zhi-Hui Guo; Hai-Rong Liu; Jiang-Man Wang; Shu-Xian Zhou; Jin-Liang Yang; Xiao-An Li
Journal:  Mol Med Rep       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 2.952

9.  Urinary EpCAM in urothelial bladder cancer patients: characterisation and evaluation of biomarker potential.

Authors:  R T Bryan; N J Shimwell; W Wei; A J Devall; S J Pirrie; N D James; M P Zeegers; K K Cheng; A Martin; D G Ward
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2013-11-28       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  A photoelectrochemical platform for the capture and release of rare single cells.

Authors:  Stephen G Parker; Ying Yang; Simone Ciampi; Bakul Gupta; Kathleen Kimpton; Friederike M Mansfeld; Maria Kavallaris; Katharina Gaus; J Justin Gooding
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-06-12       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.