Literature DB >> 21106910

Hemodynamic responses to aortic depressor nerve stimulation in conscious L-NAME-induced hypertensive rats.

Marina de Toledo Durand1, Jaci A Castania, Rubens Fazan, Maria Cristina Oliveira Salgado, Helio Cesar Salgado.   

Abstract

The present study investigated whether baroreflex control of autonomic function is impaired when there is a deficiency in NO production and the role of adrenergic and cholinergic mechanisms in mediating reflex responses. Electrical stimulation of the aortic depressor nerve in conscious normotensive and nitro-l-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME)-induced hypertensive rats was applied before and after administration of methylatropine, atenolol, and prazosin alone or in combination. The hypotensive response to progressive electrical stimulation (5 to 90 Hz) was greater in hypertensive (-27 ± 2 to -64 ± 3 mmHg) than in normotensive rats (-17 ± 1 to -46 ± 2 mmHg), whereas the bradycardic response was similar in both groups (-34 ± 5 to -92 ± 9 and -21 ± 2 to -79 ± 7 beats/min, respectively). Methylatropine and atenolol showed no effect in the hypotensive response in either group. Methylatropine blunted the bradycardic response in both groups, whereas atenolol attenuated only in hypertensive rats. Prazosin blunted the hypotensive response in both normotensive (43%) and hypertensive rats (53%) but did not affect the bradycardic response in either group. Prazosin plus angiotensin II, used to restore basal arterial pressure, provided hemodynamic responses similar to those of prazosin alone. The triple pharmacological blockade abolished the bradycardic response in both groups but displayed similar residual hypotensive response in hypertensive (-13 ± 2 to -27 ± 2 mmHg) and normotensive rats (-10 ± 1 to -25 ± 3 mmHg). In conclusion, electrical stimulation produced a well-preserved baroreflex-mediated decrease in arterial pressure and heart rate in conscious l-NAME-induced hypertensive rats. Moreover, withdrawal of the sympathetic drive played a role in the reflex bradycardia only in hypertensive rats. The residual fall in pressure after the triple pharmacological blockade suggests the involvement of a vasodilatory mechanism unrelated to NO or deactivation of α(1)-adrenergic receptor.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21106910     DOI: 10.1152/ajpregu.00463.2010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol        ISSN: 0363-6119            Impact factor:   3.619


  9 in total

1.  Role of Chemoreceptor Activation in Hemodynamic Responses to Electrical Stimulation of the Carotid Sinus in Conscious Rats.

Authors:  Pedro L Katayama; Jaci A Castania; Daniel P M Dias; Kaushik P Patel; Rubens Fazan; Helio C Salgado
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2015-07-20       Impact factor: 10.190

2.  Low intensity stimulation of aortic baroreceptor afferent fibers as a potential therapeutic alternative for hypertension treatment.

Authors:  Ibrahim M Salman; Omar Z Ameer; Sheridan McMurray; Sarah F Hassan; Arun Sridhar; Stephen J Lewis; Yee-Hsee Hsieh
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 4.996

Review 3.  Autonomic Modulation in Heart Failure: Ready for Prime Time?

Authors:  Mark E Dunlap; Anju Bhardwaj; Paul J Hauptman
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 2.931

4.  Different vasoactive effects of chronic endothelial and neuronal NO-synthase inhibition in young Wistar rats.

Authors:  Sona Cacanyiova; Andrea Berenyiova; Magdalena Malekova; Frantisek Kristek; Ima Dovinova; Peter Krenek; Lenka Pivackova; Ivana Pifkova
Journal:  J Physiol Biochem       Date:  2014-06-28       Impact factor: 4.158

5.  Effect of selective vagal nerve stimulation on blood pressure, heart rate and respiratory rate in rats under metoprolol medication.

Authors:  Mortimer Gierthmuehlen; Dennis T T Plachta
Journal:  Hypertens Res       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 3.872

6.  Time course of the hemodynamic responses to aortic depressor nerve stimulation in conscious spontaneously hypertensive rats.

Authors:  M T Durand; A L Mota; A R Barale; J A Castania; R Fazan; H C Salgado
Journal:  Braz J Med Biol Res       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 2.590

7.  Carotid sinus nerve electrical stimulation in conscious rats attenuates systemic inflammation via chemoreceptor activation.

Authors:  Fernanda Machado Santos-Almeida; Gean Domingos-Souza; César A Meschiari; Laura Campos Fávaro; Christiane Becari; Jaci A Castania; Alexandre Lopes; Thiago M Cunha; Davi J A Moraes; Fernando Q Cunha; Luis Ulloa; Alexandre Kanashiro; Geisa C S V Tezini; Helio C Salgado
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Age- and Hypertension-Related Changes in NOS/NO/sGC-Derived Vasoactive Control of Rat Thoracic Aortae.

Authors:  Andrea Berenyiova; Peter Balis; Michal Kluknavsky; Iveta Bernatova; Sona Cacanyiova; Angelika Puzserova
Journal:  Oxid Med Cell Longev       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 6.543

9.  Anodal block permits directional vagus nerve stimulation.

Authors:  Umair Ahmed; Yao-Chuan Chang; Marina Cracchiolo; Maria F Lopez; Jacquelyn N Tomaio; Timir Datta-Chaudhuri; Theodoros P Zanos; Loren Rieth; Yousef Al-Abed; Stavros Zanos
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-06-08       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.