BACKGROUND: A better understanding of allergen-specific CD4(+) T cell responses is needed to help improving immunological therapies. Objective To compare CD4(+) T cell responses against seasonal (Bet v 1) and perennial (Der p 1, Der p 2) allergens. METHODS: Major histocompatibility complex class II peptide tetramers were engineered to monitor allergen-specific T cell responses. After in vitro expansion, tetramer(+) cells were tested for surface markers using cytofluorometry. Cytokine gene expression and production were assessed using quantitative PCR and cytokine surface capture assays, respectively. RESULTS: Tetramer(+) cells were detected in 19 patients allergic to house dust mites (HDM), seven allergic to birch pollen, 13 allergic to both and nine non-allergics with either an HLA-DRB1(*) 0101, (*) 0301, (*) 1501 or an HLA-DPB1(*) 0401 background. High-avidity T cells are elicited against the immunodominant Bet v 1(141-155) epitope, whereas broader low-avidity T cell responses are induced against Der p 1(16-30) ,(110-124) ,(171-185) and Der p 2(26-40,107-121) epitopes. Responses against Bet v 1 involve effector (CDL62 low, CCR7 low) or central (CD62L(+) , CCR7(+) ) memory cells in allergic and non-allergic individuals, respectively, whereas central memory cells are mostly detected against mite allergens. In non-allergics, both mite and Bet v 1-specific T cells produce IFN-γ and IL-10. In contrast to Bet v 1-driven Th2 responses, mite allergens induce highly polymorphic responses in allergics, including Th1, Th2/Th17 or mixed Th1/Th2 profiles. Mite-specific T cell frequencies in the blood remain in the range of 1-6 × 10(-4) CD4(+) T cells throughout the year. CONCLUSION: Different memory CD4(+) T cell responses are elicited in the context of chronic vs. seasonal stimulation with the allergen(s). The heterogeneity in the patterns of CD4(+) T cell responses observed in patients allergic to HDMs should be taken into account for specific immunotherapy.
BACKGROUND: A better understanding of allergen-specific CD4(+) T cell responses is needed to help improving immunological therapies. Objective To compare CD4(+) T cell responses against seasonal (Bet v 1) and perennial (Der p 1, Der p 2) allergens. METHODS: Major histocompatibility complex class II peptide tetramers were engineered to monitor allergen-specific T cell responses. After in vitro expansion, tetramer(+) cells were tested for surface markers using cytofluorometry. Cytokine gene expression and production were assessed using quantitative PCR and cytokine surface capture assays, respectively. RESULTS: Tetramer(+) cells were detected in 19 patients allergic to house dust mites (HDM), seven allergic to birch pollen, 13 allergic to both and nine non-allergics with either an HLA-DRB1(*) 0101, (*) 0301, (*) 1501 or an HLA-DPB1(*) 0401 background. High-avidity T cells are elicited against the immunodominant Bet v 1(141-155) epitope, whereas broader low-avidity T cell responses are induced against Der p 1(16-30) ,(110-124) ,(171-185) and Der p 2(26-40,107-121) epitopes. Responses against Bet v 1 involve effector (CDL62 low, CCR7 low) or central (CD62L(+) , CCR7(+) ) memory cells in allergic and non-allergic individuals, respectively, whereas central memory cells are mostly detected against mite allergens. In non-allergics, both mite and Bet v 1-specific T cells produce IFN-γ and IL-10. In contrast to Bet v 1-driven Th2 responses, mite allergens induce highly polymorphic responses in allergics, including Th1, Th2/Th17 or mixed Th1/Th2 profiles. Mite-specific T cell frequencies in the blood remain in the range of 1-6 × 10(-4) CD4(+) T cells throughout the year. CONCLUSION: Different memory CD4(+) T cell responses are elicited in the context of chronic vs. seasonal stimulation with the allergen(s). The heterogeneity in the patterns of CD4(+) T cell responses observed in patients allergic to HDMs should be taken into account for specific immunotherapy.
Authors: Renee Jaramillo; Richard D Cohn; Patrick W Crockett; Kymberly M Gowdy; Darryl C Zeldin; Michael B Fessler Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Date: 2012-08-24 Impact factor: 10.793
Authors: Carla Oseroff; Lars H Christensen; Luise Westernberg; John Pham; Jerome Lane; Sinu Paul; Jason Greenbaum; Thomas Stranzl; Gitte Lund; Ilka Hoof; Jens Holm; Peter A Würtzen; Kåre H Meno; April Frazier; Veronique Schulten; Peter S Andersen; Bjoern Peters; Alessandro Sette Journal: Clin Exp Allergy Date: 2016-11-07 Impact factor: 5.018
Authors: M B C Dillon; V Schulten; C Oseroff; S Paul; L M Dullanty; A Frazier; X Belles; M D Piulachs; C Visness; L Bacharier; G R Bloomberg; P Busse; J Sidney; B Peters; A Sette Journal: Clin Exp Allergy Date: 2015-12 Impact factor: 5.018
Authors: D Hinz; G Seumois; A M Gholami; J A Greenbaum; J Lane; B White; D H Broide; V Schulten; J Sidney; P Bakhru; C Oseroff; E Wambre; E A James; W W Kwok; B Peters; P Vijayanand; A Sette Journal: Clin Exp Allergy Date: 2016-05 Impact factor: 5.018