BACKGROUND: Palliative medicine has made rapid progress in establishing its scientific and clinical legitimacy, yet the evidence base to support clinical practice remains deficient in both the quantity and quality of published studies. Historically, the conduct of research in palliative care populations has been impeded by multiple barriers including health care system fragmentation, small number and size of potential sites for recruitment, vulnerability of the population, perceptions of inappropriateness, ethical concerns, and gate-keeping. METHODS: A group of experienced investigators with backgrounds in palliative care research convened to consider developing a research cooperative group as a mechanism for generating high-quality evidence on prioritized, clinically relevant topics in palliative care. RESULTS: The resulting Palliative Care Research Cooperative (PCRC) agreed on a set of core principles: active, interdisciplinary membership; commitment to shared research purposes; heterogeneity of participating sites; development of research capacity in participating sites; standardization of methodologies, such as consenting and data collection/management; agile response to research requests from government, industry, and investigators; focus on translation; education and training of future palliative care researchers; actionable results that can inform clinical practice and policy. Consensus was achieved on a first collaborative study, a randomized clinical trial of statin discontinuation versus continuation in patients with a prognosis of less than 6 months who are taking statins for primary or secondary prevention. This article describes the formation of the PCRC, highlighting processes and decisions taken to optimize the cooperative group's success.
BACKGROUND: Palliative medicine has made rapid progress in establishing its scientific and clinical legitimacy, yet the evidence base to support clinical practice remains deficient in both the quantity and quality of published studies. Historically, the conduct of research in palliative care populations has been impeded by multiple barriers including health care system fragmentation, small number and size of potential sites for recruitment, vulnerability of the population, perceptions of inappropriateness, ethical concerns, and gate-keeping. METHODS: A group of experienced investigators with backgrounds in palliative care research convened to consider developing a research cooperative group as a mechanism for generating high-quality evidence on prioritized, clinically relevant topics in palliative care. RESULTS: The resulting Palliative Care Research Cooperative (PCRC) agreed on a set of core principles: active, interdisciplinary membership; commitment to shared research purposes; heterogeneity of participating sites; development of research capacity in participating sites; standardization of methodologies, such as consenting and data collection/management; agile response to research requests from government, industry, and investigators; focus on translation; education and training of future palliative care researchers; actionable results that can inform clinical practice and policy. Consensus was achieved on a first collaborative study, a randomized clinical trial of statin discontinuation versus continuation in patients with a prognosis of less than 6 months who are taking statins for primary or secondary prevention. This article describes the formation of the PCRC, highlighting processes and decisions taken to optimize the cooperative group's success.
Authors: Arthur G Cosby; Holli C Hitt; Tonya Thornton-Neaves; Robert Cameron McMillen; Karen Koch; B Todd Sitzman; Eric J Pearson; T Steve Parvin Journal: J Miss State Med Assoc Date: 2005-10
Authors: David Christopher Currow; Tania M Shelby-James; Meera Agar; John Plummer; Deborah Rowett; Paul Glare; Odette Spruyt; Janet Hardy Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2009-11-29 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: C S Cleeland; R Gonin; A K Hatfield; J H Edmonson; R H Blum; J A Stewart; K J Pandya Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1994-03-03 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: R K Portenoy; H T Thaler; A B Kornblith; J M Lepore; H Friedlander-Klar; N Coyle; T Smart-Curley; N Kemeny; L Norton; W Hoskins Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 1994-06 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Jennifer Tjia; Sarah L Cutrona; Daniel Peterson; George Reed; Susan E Andrade; Susan L Mitchell Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2014-11-04 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Ziad Bakouny; Tarek Assi; Elie El Rassy; Karen Daccache; Clarisse Kattan; Aline Tohme; Marie Claire Mouhawej; Joseph Kattan Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2018-11-07 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Arif H Kamal; David C Currow; Christine Ritchie; Janet Bull; Jane L Wheeler; Amy P Abernethy Journal: Curr Oncol Rep Date: 2011-08 Impact factor: 5.075
Authors: Christine L Ritchie; Kathryn I Pollak; Karen A Kehl; Jeri L Miller; Jean S Kutner Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2017-04-27 Impact factor: 2.947