Literature DB >> 21105587

Comparison of intraoral 3D scanning and conventional impressions for fabrication of orthodontic retainers.

Sivabalan Vasudavan1, Stephen R Sullivan, Andrew L Sonis.   

Abstract

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21105587

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Orthod        ISSN: 0022-3875


× No keyword cloud information.
  4 in total

1.  Accuracy of four intraoral scanners in oral implantology: a comparative in vitro study.

Authors:  Mario Imburgia; Silvia Logozzo; Uli Hauschild; Giovanni Veronesi; Carlo Mangano; Francesco Guido Mangano
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2017-06-02       Impact factor: 2.757

2.  Efficient digitalization method for dental restorations using micro-CT data.

Authors:  Changhwan Kim; Seung Hoon Baek; Taewon Lee; Jonggun Go; Sun Young Kim; Seungryong Cho
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 3.  Challenges, limitations, and solutions for orthodontists during the coronavirus pandemic: A review.

Authors:  Milad Malekshoar; Mehrdad Malekshoar; Bahareh Javanshir
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 2.650

4.  Conventional and digital impressions for complete-arch implant-supported fixed prostheses: time, implant quantity effect and patient satisfaction.

Authors:  Ana Larisse Carneiro Pereira; Vitória Ramos Medeiros; Maria de Fátima Trindade Pinto Campos; Annie Karoline Bezerra de Medeiros; Burak Yilmaz; Adriana da Fonte Porto Carreiro
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2022-08-29       Impact factor: 1.989

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.