Literature DB >> 21104230

Bone remodeling around stable uncemented titanium stems during the second decade after total hip arthroplasty: a DXA study at 12 and 17 years.

C Merle1, M R Streit, C Volz, M Pritsch, T Gotterbarm, P R Aldinger.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: In a cohort study, bone mineral density (BMD) around uncemented femoral components after total hip arthroplasty (THA) was evaluated. The results suggest that there are no clinically relevant changes in overall periprosthetic BMD in the second decade. However, continuous remodeling with limited proximal bone loss (stress-shielding) occurs, predominantly in female patients.
INTRODUCTION: Progressive periprosthetic bone loss and stress-shielding are a major concern in THA. Little is known about the extent and pattern of periprosthetic bone remodeling around uncemented stems in the second decade.
METHODS: In a cohort study, periprosthetic BMD was measured in 131 patients with 146 uncemented CLS stems using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) at a mean of 12 years postoperatively (t1). Patients were followed clinically and radiographically, and a second DXA was performed at a mean of 17 years postoperatively (t2) using the identical protocol.
RESULTS: We obtained a complete set of two consecutive DXA measurements for 88 hips (78 patients, 35 male, 43 female). On radiographic evaluation at t1 and t2, regular bone ongrowth was present in all cases and no signs of radiographic loosening, severe bone loss or diaphyseal cortical hypertrophy were detected. There was no clinically relevant change in overall periprosthetic BMD (netavg) between t1 and t2 for both male and female patients. We analyzed the differences in BMD in the periprosthetic regions of interest (ROIs) according to Gruen and found a slight decrease in periprosthetic BMD in ROI 7 in male patients and in ROIs 1, 4, 6 and 7 in female patients.
CONCLUSIONS: The study suggests that there are no clinically relevant changes in overall periprosthetic BMD around stable, straight uncemented stems between 12 and 17 years postoperatively. However, continuous remodeling with limited proximal bone loss occurs, predominantly in female patients. After secondary osteointegration of this implant, stress-shielding remains minimal in the second decade.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21104230     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-010-1483-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  34 in total

1.  Monitoring of periprosthetic BMD after uncemented total hip arthroplasty with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry--a 3-year follow-up study.

Authors:  P K Venesmaa; H P Kröger; H J Miettinen; J S Jurvelin; O T Suomalainen; E M Alhava
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 6.741

2.  A ten- to 15-year follow-up of the cementless spotorno stem.

Authors:  P R Aldinger; S J Breusch; M Lukoschek; H Mau; V Ewerbeck; M Thomsen
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2003-03

3.  Osteolysis in alloarthroplasty of the hip. The role of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene wear particles.

Authors:  H G Willert; H Bertram; G H Buchhorn
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Long-term periprosthetic remodeling in THA shows structural preservation.

Authors:  James B Stiehl
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-02-14       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Measurement of bone mineral density by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry in patients with the Wisconsin hip, an uncemented femoral stem.

Authors:  B J Kiratli; M M Checovich; A A McBeath; M A Wilson; J P Heiner
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 4.757

Review 6.  Bone density at the proximal femur after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  H Kröger; P Venesmaa; J Jurvelin; H Miettinen; O Suomalainen; E Alhava
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Evaluation of periprosthetic bone using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry: precision of the method and effect of operation on bone mineral density.

Authors:  H Kröger; H Miettinen; I Arnala; E Koski; N Rushton; O Suomalainen
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 6.741

8.  Longitudinal evaluation of time related bone remodeling after cementless total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  T Nishii; N Sugano; K Masuhara; T Shibuya; T Ochi; S Tamura
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Middle-term results of threaded acetabular cups. High failure rates five years after surgery.

Authors:  H G Simank; D R Brocai; D Reiser; M Thomsen; D Sabo; M Lukoschek
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1997-05

10.  "Modes of failure" of cemented stem-type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening.

Authors:  T A Gruen; G M McNeice; H C Amstutz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1979-06       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  10 in total

1.  Densitometric evaluation of periprosthetic bone remodeling.

Authors:  Paolo Domenico Parchi; Valentina Cervi; Nicola Piolanti; Gianluca Ciapini; Lorenzo Andreani; Iacopo Castellini; Andrea Poggetti; Michele Lisanti
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2014-09

2.  Periprosthetic bone remodelling of short-stem total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review.

Authors:  Shuang G Yan; Patrick Weber; Arnd Steinbrück; Xingyi Hua; Volkmar Jansson; Florian Schmidutz
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Primary stability of the Fitmore stem: biomechanical comparison.

Authors:  Wojciech Pepke; Jan Nadorf; Volker Ewerbeck; Marcus R Streit; Stefan Kinkel; Tobias Gotterbarm; Michael W Maier; J Philippe Kretzer
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-10-22       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Finite element analysis of cementless femoral stems based on mid- and long-term radiological evaluation.

Authors:  Kanehiro Matsuyama; Yasuhiro Ishidou; Yong-Ming Guo; Hironori Kakoi; Takao Setoguchi; Satoshi Nagano; Ichiro Kawamura; Shingo Maeda; Setsuro Komiya
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2016-09-19       Impact factor: 2.362

5.  Long-term bone remodelling around 'legendary' cementless femoral stems.

Authors:  Charles Rivière; Guido Grappiolo; Charles A Engh; Jean-Pierre Vidalain; Antonia-F Chen; Nicolas Boehler; Jihad Matta; Pascal-André Vendittoli
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2018-02-26

6.  High periprosthetic bone mineral density measured in immediate postoperative period may not guarantee less periprosthetic bone loss in the proximal femur after cementless total hip arthroplasty - A retrospective study.

Authors:  Guangtao Fu; Yuanchen Ma; Junxing Liao; Yunlian Xue; Mengyuan Li; Qingtian Li; Zhantao Deng; Qiujian Zheng
Journal:  Arthroplasty       Date:  2020-01-23

7.  Zoledronic Acid for Periprosthetic Bone Mineral Density Changes in Patients With Osteoporosis After Hip Arthroplasty-An Updated Meta-Analysis of Six Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Yuan Liu; Jia-Wen Xu; Ming-Yang Li; Li-Min Wu; Yi Zeng; Bin Shen
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-12-23

8.  Comparison of Femoral Bone Mineral Density Changes around 3 Common Designs of Cementless Stems after Total Hip Arthroplasty-A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Yuan Liu; Wen-Xing Wei; Yi Zeng; Jun Ma; Jing Yang; Bin Shen
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2022-04-25       Impact factor: 2.279

Review 9.  Periprosthetic bone remodeling of short cementless femoral stems in primary total hip arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials.

Authors:  Shuang G Yan; Di Li; Shuai Yin; Xingyi Hua; Jian Tang; Florian Schmidutz
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 1.817

10.  Cemented versus uncemented total hip replacement for femoral neck fractures in elderly patients: a retrospective, multicentre study with a mean 5-year follow-up.

Authors:  Shuai Mao; Baomin Chen; Ying Zhu; Liang Qian; Jinluan Lin; Xinchao Zhang; Weiguang Yu; Guowei Han
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-09-30       Impact factor: 2.359

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.