Literature DB >> 21104046

Design and rationale of the assessment of proper physiologic response with rate adaptive pacing driven by minute ventilation or accelerometer (APPROPRIATE) trial.

F Roosevelt Gilliam1, Michael Giudici, Andrew Benn, Bruce Koplan, Kellie Jean Chase Berg, Stacia Merkel Kraus, Kira Q Stolen, Guy E Alvarez, Donald L Hopper, Bruce L Wilkoff.   

Abstract

Rate-adaptive sensors are designed to restore a physiologic heart rate response to activity, in particular for patients that have chronotropic incompetence (CI). Limited data exist comparing two primary types of sensors; an accelerometer (XL) sensor which detects activity or motion and a minute ventilation (MV) sensor, which detects the product of respiration rate and tidal volume. The APPROPRIATE study will evaluate the MV sensor compared with the XL sensor for superiority in improving functional capacity (peak VO(2)) in pacemaker patients that have CI. This study is a double-blind, randomized, two-arm trial that will enroll approximately 1,000 pacemaker patients. Patients will complete a 6-min walk test at the 2-week visit to screen for potential CI. Those projected to have CI will advance to a 1-month visit. At the 1-month visit, final determination of CI will be done by completing a peak exercise treadmill test while the pacemaker is programmed to DDDR with the device sensors set to passive. Patients failing to meet the study criteria for CI will not continue further in the trial. Patients that demonstrate CI will be randomized to program their rate-adaptive sensors to either MV or XL in a 1:1 ratio. The rate-adaptive sensor will be optimized for each patient using a short walk to determine the appropriate response factor. At a 2-month visit, patients will complete a CPX test with the rate-adaptive sensors in their randomized setting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21104046     DOI: 10.1007/s12265-010-9228-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res        ISSN: 1937-5387            Impact factor:   4.132


  28 in total

1.  Rate responsive dual chamber pacing.

Authors:  L J Kappenberger; L Herpers
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 1.976

2.  Chronotropic incompetence: a common and progressive finding in pacemaker patients.

Authors:  N Gwinn; R Leman; J Kratz; J K White; M R Zile; P Gillette
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 4.749

3.  Chronotropic incompetence in clinical exercise testing.

Authors:  R D Wiens; P Lafia; C M Marder; R G Evans; H L Kennedy
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1984-07-01       Impact factor: 2.778

4.  Incidence and significance of chronotropic incompetence in patients with indications for primary pacemaker implantation or pacemaker replacement.

Authors:  J Lukl; V Doupal; E Sovová; L Lubena
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 1.976

5.  Chronotropic incompetence in patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator: prevalence and predicting factors.

Authors:  Christoph Melzer; Marco Böhm; Hans Joachim Bondke; William Combs; Gert Baumann; Heinz Theres
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.976

6.  A prospective multicenter study demonstrating clinical benefit with a new accelerometer-based DDDR pacemaker. Dromos Dr Investigators Group.

Authors:  A Lazarus; K Mitchell
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 1.976

7.  Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion.

Authors:  G A Borg
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 5.411

8.  Impaired heart rate response to graded exercise. Prognostic implications of chronotropic incompetence in the Framingham Heart Study.

Authors:  M S Lauer; P M Okin; M G Larson; J C Evans; D Levy
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1996-04-15       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Prognostic significance of impairment of heart rate response to exercise: impact of left ventricular function and myocardial ischemia.

Authors:  Abdou Elhendy; Douglas W Mahoney; Bijoy K Khandheria; Kelli Burger; Patricia A Pellikka
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2003-09-03       Impact factor: 24.094

10.  The chronotropic response of the sinus node to exercise: a new method of analysis and a study of pacemaker patients.

Authors:  B Crook; P Nijhof; P van der Kemp; C Jennison
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 29.983

View more
  2 in total

1.  Incorrect Holter-ECG analysis caused by the pacemaker delivering small high-frequency currents for thoracic impedance measurement.

Authors:  Masaomi Chinushi; Hitoshi Tachikawa; Yuko Chinushi; Toshio Yamaguchi; Osamu Saitoh; Takashi Tsuda
Journal:  J Cardiol Cases       Date:  2017-09-12

2.  Chronotropic incompetence in Chagas disease: effectiveness of blended sensor (volume/minute and accelerometer).

Authors:  Antonio da Silva Menezes Junior; Aline Pereira da Silva; Giovana Gurian Batista Profahl; Catarine Ottobeli; Jutay Fernando Silva Louzeiro
Journal:  Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc       Date:  2015 Jul-Sep
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.