Literature DB >> 2110350

Practice guidelines and standards: an overview.

L L Leape1.   

Abstract

Organized medicine, insurance companies, regulators, and the peer review organizations are all interested in practice guidelines. Recently, the U.S. Congress established the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, which is charged with overseeing the development of practice guidelines. If properly developed, disseminated, and used, practice guidelines should reduce the incidence of inappropriate care and help control costs. Although guidelines have been used by physicians for years, guidelines now being developed should be more comprehensive, specific, exhaustive, and--on the basis of the best scientific evidence of effectiveness and expert opinion--more effectively discriminate between useful and useless care. Practice guidelines can improve the quality of care when used voluntarily by physicians in practice, when used as standards for quality monitoring and assurance programs, and when used as the basis for reimbursement for services. All interested parties should share responsibilities for the research, development, and production of appropriateness criteria, their translation into guidelines and standards, and the dissemination and maintenance of the guidelines, including evaluation, revision, and updating.

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2110350     DOI: 10.1016/s0097-5990(16)30335-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  QRB Qual Rev Bull        ISSN: 0097-5990


  18 in total

Review 1.  Medicine, management, and modernisation: a "danse macabre"?

Authors:  Pieter Degeling; Sharyn Maxwell; John Kennedy; Barbara Coyle
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-03-22

2.  An audit of distribution and use of guidelines for management of head injury.

Authors:  R Madhok; R G Thomson; A Mordue; A D Mendelow; J Barker
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1993-03

3.  Guidelines for medical practice.

Authors:  D Macdonald
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1991-03-15       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  An expert system for performance-based direct delivery of published clinical evidence.

Authors:  E A Balas; Z R Li; D C Spencer; F Jaffrey; E Brent; J A Mitchell
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1996 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.497

5.  Online practice guidelines: issues, obstacles, and future prospects.

Authors:  R D Zielstorff
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1998 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.497

6.  Assessing the effectiveness of health interventions for cost-effectiveness analysis. Panel on Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine.

Authors:  J S Mandelblatt; D G Fryback; M C Weinstein; L B Russell; M R Gold
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Differences in generalist and specialist physicians' knowledge and use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors for congestive heart failure.

Authors:  M H Chin; P D Friedmann; C K Cassel; R M Lang
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 8.  Evaluation of clinical practice guidelines.

Authors:  A S Basinski
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1995-12-01       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 9.  Informatics: essential infrastructure for quality assessment and improvement in nursing.

Authors:  S B Henry
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1995 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.497

10.  A brief history of health care quality assessment and improvement in the United States.

Authors:  J M Luce; A B Bindman; P R Lee
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1994-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.