Literature DB >> 21103430

Chest pain during upper endoscopy.

Jae Myung Park1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 21103430      PMCID: PMC2978401          DOI: 10.5056/jnm.2010.16.4.442

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurogastroenterol Motil        ISSN: 2093-0879            Impact factor:   4.924


× No keyword cloud information.
A 75-year-old male patient visited Seoul St. Mary's Hospital for regular check-up after endoscopic resection of the early gastric cancer. He complained of mild and intermittent dysphagia to solids and liquids for 1 year duration. Frequency of dysphagia increased recently. Previously performed upper endoscopies were reported as normal. After insertion of endoscopy, he complained of severe chest pain. The esophageal mucosa appeared normal but there were severe contractions leading to resistance in advancing the scope in the mid esophagus (Fig. 1). Esophagogram showed a corkscrew appearance on the mid and lower part of the esophagus (Fig. 2). Esophageal manometry disclosed the hypercontractile amplitudes of 365 mmHg (Fig. 3). A normal relaxation of the lower esophageal sphincter ruled out achalasia. Cardiac evaluation revealed nonspecific findings. These findings led to the diagnosis of diffuse esophageal spasm (DES), which was responsible for the chest pain. Chest pain subsided with the treatment of proton pump inhibitor, verapamil and isosorbide mononitrate.
Figure 1

Upper endoscopy before (A) and after (B) the development of chest pain. Powerful contraction of mid esophagus is observed in the figure 1B.

Figure 2

Corkscrew esophagus on barium esophagogram.

Figure 3

Esophageal manometry shows multiple spontaneous simultaneous contractions. The amplitudes of these contractions are particularly high.

The pain associated with DES are very variable in severity and sometimes can mimic that of angina pectoris.1 Upper endoscopy is firstly recommended to detect structural causes of dysphagia and noncardiac chest pain. In most affected patients, the esophagus retains the ability to propagate normal peristaltic contractions. As endoscopy has substantial limitations in assessing abnormal esophageal motility in DES, the intraluminal manometry is usually needed for the diagnosis of increased pressure of nonperistaltic contractions.2 The presented case showed interestingly endoscopic findings strongly suggestive of DES along with compatible radiographic and manometric findings.
  2 in total

Review 1.  Diffuse esophageal spasm.

Authors:  Claudia Grübel; Jan Borovicka; Werner Schwizer; Mark Fox; Geoff Hebbard
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-11-15       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 2.  Evaluation and diagnosis of noncardiac chest pain.

Authors:  Ronnie Fass
Journal:  Dis Mon       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.800

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.