Literature DB >> 21103372

Multiplexed DNA sequence capture of mitochondrial genomes using PCR products.

Tomislav Maricic1, Mark Whitten, Svante Pääbo.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To utilize the power of high-throughput sequencers, target enrichment methods have been developed. The majority of these require reagents and equipment that are only available from commercial vendors and are not suitable for the targets that are a few kilobases in length. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL
FINDINGS: We describe a novel and economical method in which custom made long-range PCR products are used to capture complete human mitochondrial genomes from complex DNA mixtures. We use the method to capture 46 complete mitochondrial genomes in parallel and we sequence them on a single lane of an Illumina GA(II) instrument.
CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: This method is economical and simple and particularly suitable for targets that can be amplified by PCR and do not contain highly repetitive sequences such as mtDNA. It has applications in population genetics and forensics, as well as studies of ancient DNA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21103372      PMCID: PMC2982832          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0014004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


Introduction

Methods that enrich DNA samples for particular DNA sequences are important in order to allow efficient sequencing of targets that are present in complex mixtures of irrelevant DNA sequences. These may either be entire genomes of organisms under study or DNA from several organisms in environmental or medical samples [1], [2]. Methods that are able to “capture” relevant DNA sequences rely on hybridization of target sequences to probes that can be either in solution or immobilized on a surface (e.g. [3], [4], [5]). The hybridization is sometimes followed by extensions [2] or extension in combination with circularization of the probes [6]. Other methods rely on micro-droplet-based selection [7]. Although all these methods achieve their goals, they involve probes and/or equipment that have to be purchased from manufacturers at substantial costs as well as loss of time. Here, we present a method where PCR products are used to capture targets for sequencing from pooled sequencing libraries of multiple individuals, using standard laboratory equipment. We apply this method to DNA pools of libraries from several human individuals from which we capture complete mitochondrial (mt) DNAs, a maternally inherited DNA molecule which is extensively studied in population genetics, medicine, forensics, and phylogenetics [8].

Materials and Methods

Production of indexed libraries

DNA extracts of 46 individuals from which the hypervariable region I had been sequenced [9] were used for indexed Solexa library preparation. First, eight hundred ng of DNA were sonicated (Bioruptor, Diogenode, Liege, Belgium) five times for seven minutes with the output selector switched to (H)igh. This fragmented the DNA to a range of 150 to 800 base-pairs. Two hundred ng were then used for the production of the indexed libraries as published [10], starting from the blunting step. In the last step of the protocol, the indexing amplification was run into plateau (20 cycles) and the reactions were purified using a MinElute PCR purification kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). DNA concentrations of individual libraries were measured with a spectrophotometer (NanoDrop ND-1000, Thermo Scientific, Wilmington, DE, USA) and the libraries were pooled in equimolar amounts to a total of 2 µg.

Bait production

Two overlapping long-range PCR products encompassing the whole mitochondrial genome were produced as described [11]; DNA extracted from the saliva of one individual was used as the template. The PCR products were purified using carboxyl-coated magnetic beads (SPRI beads, Agencourt AMPure XP, Agencourt, Beverly, MA, USA) and the concentration was measured by NanoDrop. The two products were pooled in equimolar amounts to a total amount of 3 µg; the pooled products were sonicated (Bioruptor) two times for seven minutes with the output selector switched to (H)igh which produced fragments from 150 to 850 bases long. The products were biotinylated by ligating the Bio-T/B adapter (sequence in Supplementary protocol S1), MinElute column purified, made single-stranded and immobilized on streptavidin-coated magnetic beads.

Hybridization

The pooled libraries were made single-stranded and added to the bait-coated beads; the mixture was attached to a rotator and rotated at 65°C in a hybridization oven (SciGene, Model 700, Sunnyvale, CA, USA). After 48 hours, library molecules that did not hybridize to the bait were washed away and the enriched library pool was eluted by heating for 3 minutes at 95°C. The DNA concentration was measured by qPCR (Mx3005P Real Time PCR System, Stratagene, La Jolla, CA), the pool was further amplified for 15 cycles using the bridge primers (sequence in Supplementary protocol S1) and purified with the SPRI beads; the concentration of the 22 µl eluate was determined with the Bioanalyzer 2100 DNA 1000 chip (Agilent Santa Clara, CA).

Sequencing

Libraries were sequenced with 76+7 cycles on one lane of an Illumina flow cell (Cluster Generation kit V2, FC-103-300x sequencing chemistry) according to the manufacturer's instructions for Single Read Multiplex sequencing on the Genome Analyzer IIx platform. The run was processed with RTA 1.5 (Illumina Inc.). Afterwards, the PhiX 174 control reads were aligned to the corresponding reference sequence to obtain a training data set for the base caller Ibis [12]. Raw sequences called from Ibis were separated by sample using their index read (allowing one mismatch and the loss of the first base) [12]. Sequences obtained for each sample were searched for the adapter sequence (AGATCGGAAGAGCACACGTCTGAACTCCAG) and read ends trimmed back when they could represent adapter sequence. Further, reads were filtered for sequence quality and complexity. In this step, reads having more than 5 bases with a quality score below 10 (PHRED score) [12] and reads with sequence entropy below 0.85 were removed (where entropy was calculated by summing -p*log2(p) for each of the four bases; p is the frequency of a base in the read).

Assembly

The reads for each of the 46 samples were mapped to the revised Cambridge reference mitochondrial sequence (NC012920.1) using the iterative mapping assembler MIA [13]. Mapping allowed for up to four mismatches or three mismatches and one indel in a 76 base long read. Reads starting and ending at the same coordinate were then collapsed, making one consensus read by taking the highest quality base for each position [14]. From the mapped reads, consensus mitochondrial sequence was called: a base was called in the consensus sequence if the score for the base was a positive number (200 points are given for match, −600 for mismatch, and −100 for an N in the read), otherwise an N was called.

Results and Discussion

Equimolar amounts of two long-range PCR products which together encompass the complete mitochondrial genome, which is a double-stranded circular molecule of 16,6 kb, were pooled and fragmented by sonication, ligated to a biotinylated DNA adapter, denatured, and immobilized on streptavidin-coated magnetic beads (Figure 1, top left). The immobilization prevents self-hybridization of the bait molecules that occur if they are free in solution. DNA extracted from blood or saliva from 46 individuals [9] were used to produce indexed Solexa libraries [10], which were pooled in equimolar amounts, denatured (Figure 1, top right) and incubated with the beads for 48 hours. The beads were then washed and the captured molecules were heat-eluted, amplified and sequenced (Figure 1, bottom) on one lane of a Solexa Genome Analyzer II.
Figure 1

Overview of the capture-on-beads method.

On the left the production of the immobilized bait from two long range PCR products is shown; on the right the production of a pool of indexed libraries which are used in the capture (bottom). The eluted molecules can either be sequenced directly or first amplified and then sequenced. The bait is light red, mitochondrial DNA in the libraries is dark red, indices are shown in green and pink, adapters in gray. Thicker lines represent double stranded DNA while thinner lines represent single stranded DNA.

Overview of the capture-on-beads method.

On the left the production of the immobilized bait from two long range PCR products is shown; on the right the production of a pool of indexed libraries which are used in the capture (bottom). The eluted molecules can either be sequenced directly or first amplified and then sequenced. The bait is light red, mitochondrial DNA in the libraries is dark red, indices are shown in green and pink, adapters in gray. Thicker lines represent double stranded DNA while thinner lines represent single stranded DNA. The number of reads per individual varied between 237,763 and 801,556 (Figure 2). On average, 16% of the reads in each sample mapped [14] to the reference mtDNA sequence (NC_012920) (Figure 2) and the average mtDNA coverage varied between 43- and 151-fold (Figure 3). The minimum coverage at any base in any sample was 8-fold (Figure 3). The coverage across the mitochondrial genome and samples was fairly uniform, with a 6-fold difference between the positions of highest and lowest coverage (Figure 4).
Figure 2

Number of reads sequenced (green bar) and aligned to the mitochondrial genome (red bar) for each sample.

Figure 3

Average (red squares) and minimum coverage (green squares) of the mitochondrial genome for each sample.

Figure 4

Coverage of each position across the whole mitochondrial genome, considering all the samples together.

To validate the method, we compared the sequences determined by us to sequences for parts (hypervariable region I) of the same mtDNAs produced by a traditional approach where PCR products were sequenced by the Sanger method [9]. After the exclusion of a homopolymeric C-stretch which can vary in length due to PCR-induced nucleotide misincorporations, a total of 17,134 bases (approximately 372 per individual) could be compared. They agreed except at seven positions in single individuals, where Ns were called by the capture/Solexa method. These Ns most probably arise due to rare recombination events during the amplification of the pool of indexed libraries and can be avoided by omitting this step [10], [15]. One N was called both in the PCR/Sanger and the capture/Solexa in one individual. This is probably due to heteroplasmy, i.e. the presence of two different mtDNA sequences in this individual. Numts are insertions of parts of mitochondrial genome into the nuclear genome [8]. Because of their similarity to the mitochondrial genome numts can potentially hybridize to the mitochondrial DNA-derived baits and lead to ambiguities in mtDNA sequences (represented as Ns) or even to incorrect sequence determination. To test for the potential presence of numts we mapped all the reads overlapping ambiguous positions (Ns) against the human genome with blat [16]. Only 0.08% of the reads had a higher score to the nuclear genome then to the organellar mtDNA and are thus potentially numts. Additionally, we translated all protein-coding sequences in silico (13 per mitochondrial sequence) and found no premature stop codons. This demonstrates that the capture method is reasonably insensitive to human numts. The method described allows the efficient capture of any unique sequence for which a PCR product can be generated. It is cost efficient in that it requires only standard laboratory equipment and reagents and fast in that the capture can be performed immediately when the PCR products are at hand. A similar method for capturing mtDNAs was recently described [5]. The authors performed 100 PCR reactions to produce biotinylated baits covering the mtDNA and performed two consecutive hybridizations in solution. The approach presented here is different in that the bait is immobilized on the beads during capture. This prevents the bait molecules from self-hybridizing making both strands accessible for the target capture and the production of the bait simpler (e.g. only two PCR reactions are needed). Additionally, we have shown that our approach can be multiplexed, allowing for efficient analysis of many samples in parallel. In our research group it has been used to capture complete mitochondrial genomes from complex samples such as saliva and ancient hominin bones. Although the efficiency of capture is slightly lower when the human DNA is contaminated by one or two orders of magnitude greater amounts of microbial DNA, it is possible to retrieve complete mitochondrial genomes from most such samples using this method. Detailed protocol of the capture-on-beads method. (0.12 MB DOC) Click here for additional data file.
  16 in total

1.  BLAT--the BLAST-like alignment tool.

Authors:  W James Kent
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 9.043

Review 2.  Target-enrichment strategies for next-generation sequencing.

Authors:  Lira Mamanova; Alison J Coffey; Carol E Scott; Iwanka Kozarewa; Emily H Turner; Akash Kumar; Eleanor Howard; Jay Shendure; Daniel J Turner
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 28.547

3.  Illumina sequencing library preparation for highly multiplexed target capture and sequencing.

Authors:  Matthias Meyer; Martin Kircher
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Protoc       Date:  2010-06

Review 4.  Mitochondrial DNA and human evolution.

Authors:  Brigitte Pakendorf; Mark Stoneking
Journal:  Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 8.929

5.  DNA recombination during PCR.

Authors:  A Meyerhans; J P Vartanian; S Wain-Hobson
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1990-04-11       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Targeted retrieval and analysis of five Neandertal mtDNA genomes.

Authors:  Adrian W Briggs; Jeffrey M Good; Richard E Green; Johannes Krause; Tomislav Maricic; Udo Stenzel; Carles Lalueza-Fox; Pavao Rudan; Dejana Brajkovic; Zeljko Kucan; Ivan Gusic; Ralf Schmitz; Vladimir B Doronichev; Liubov V Golovanova; Marco de la Rasilla; Javier Fortea; Antonio Rosas; Svante Pääbo
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-07-17       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  A complete mtDNA genome of an early modern human from Kostenki, Russia.

Authors:  Johannes Krause; Adrian W Briggs; Martin Kircher; Tomislav Maricic; Nicolas Zwyns; Anatoli Derevianko; Svante Pääbo
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2009-12-31       Impact factor: 10.834

8.  Heteroplasmic mitochondrial DNA mutations in normal and tumour cells.

Authors:  Yiping He; Jian Wu; Devin C Dressman; Christine Iacobuzio-Donahue; Sanford D Markowitz; Victor E Velculescu; Luis A Diaz; Kenneth W Kinzler; Bert Vogelstein; Nickolas Papadopoulos
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-03-03       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Investigating the effects of prehistoric migrations in Siberia: genetic variation and the origins of Yakuts.

Authors:  Brigitte Pakendorf; Innokentij N Novgorodov; Vladimir L Osakovskij; Al'bina P Danilova; Artur P Protod'jakonov; Mark Stoneking
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2006-07-15       Impact factor: 5.881

10.  Improved base calling for the Illumina Genome Analyzer using machine learning strategies.

Authors:  Martin Kircher; Udo Stenzel; Janet Kelso
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2009-08-14       Impact factor: 13.583

View more
  206 in total

1.  Complete mtDNA genomes of Filipino ethnolinguistic groups: a melting pot of recent and ancient lineages in the Asia-Pacific region.

Authors:  Frederick Delfin; Albert Min-Shan Ko; Mingkun Li; Ellen D Gunnarsdóttir; Kristina A Tabbada; Jazelyn M Salvador; Gayvelline C Calacal; Minerva S Sagum; Francisco A Datar; Sabino G Padilla; Maria Corazon A De Ungria; Mark Stoneking
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 4.246

2.  Larger mitochondrial DNA than Y-chromosome differences between matrilocal and patrilocal groups from Sumatra.

Authors:  Ellen Dröfn Gunnarsdóttir; Madhusudan R Nandineni; Mingkun Li; Sean Myles; David Gil; Brigitte Pakendorf; Mark Stoneking
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 14.919

3.  True single-molecule DNA sequencing of a pleistocene horse bone.

Authors:  Ludovic Orlando; Aurelien Ginolhac; Maanasa Raghavan; Julia Vilstrup; Morten Rasmussen; Kim Magnussen; Kathleen E Steinmann; Philipp Kapranov; John F Thompson; Grant Zazula; Duane Froese; Ida Moltke; Beth Shapiro; Michael Hofreiter; Khaled A S Al-Rasheid; M Thomas P Gilbert; Eske Willerslev
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2011-07-29       Impact factor: 9.043

4.  The next generation of genetic investigations into the Black Death.

Authors:  Michael Knapp
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-09-08       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Screening ancient tuberculosis with qPCR: challenges and opportunities.

Authors:  Kelly M Harkins; Jane E Buikstra; Tessa Campbell; Kirsten I Bos; Eric D Johnson; Johannes Krause; Anne C Stone
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2015-01-19       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Partial uracil-DNA-glycosylase treatment for screening of ancient DNA.

Authors:  Nadin Rohland; Eadaoin Harney; Swapan Mallick; Susanne Nordenfelt; David Reich
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2015-01-19       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Complete mitochondrial DNA genome sequences from the first New Zealanders.

Authors:  Michael Knapp; K Ann Horsburgh; Stefan Prost; Jo-Ann Stanton; Hallie R Buckley; Richard K Walter; Elizabeth A Matisoo-Smith
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-10-22       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  Almost 20 years of Neanderthal palaeogenetics: adaptation, admixture, diversity, demography and extinction.

Authors:  Federico Sánchez-Quinto; Carles Lalueza-Fox
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2015-01-19       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Validation of qPCR Methods for the Detection of Mycobacterium in New World Animal Reservoirs.

Authors:  Genevieve Housman; Joanna Malukiewicz; Vanner Boere; Adriana D Grativol; Luiz Cezar M Pereira; Ita de Oliveira Silva; Carlos R Ruiz-Miranda; Richard Truman; Anne C Stone
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2015-11-16

10.  Neolithic mitochondrial haplogroup H genomes and the genetic origins of Europeans.

Authors:  Paul Brotherton; Wolfgang Haak; Jennifer Templeton; Guido Brandt; Julien Soubrier; Christina Jane Adler; Stephen M Richards; Clio Der Sarkissian; Robert Ganslmeier; Susanne Friederich; Veit Dresely; Mannis van Oven; Rosalie Kenyon; Mark B Van der Hoek; Jonas Korlach; Khai Luong; Simon Y W Ho; Lluis Quintana-Murci; Doron M Behar; Harald Meller; Kurt W Alt; Alan Cooper
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.