OBJECTIVES: The aim of the current study was to test the reproducibility of different quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) methods to assess the morphologic and functional peripheral vascular status and vascular adaptations over time in patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten patients with proven PAD (intermittent claudication) and arterial collateral formation within the upper leg and 10 healthy volunteers were included. All subjects underwent 2 identical MR examinations of the lower extremities on a clinical 1.5-T MR system, with a time interval of at least 3 days. The MR protocol consisted of 3D contrast-enhanced MR angiography to quantify the number of arteries and artery diameters of the upper leg, 2D cine MR phase contrast angiography flow measurements in the popliteal artery, dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) perfusion imaging to determine the influx constant and area under the curve, and dynamic blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) imaging in calf muscle to measure maximal relative T2* changes and time-to-peak. Data were analyzed by 2 independent MRI readers. Interscan and inter-reader reproducibility were determined as outcome measures and expressed as the coefficient of variation (CV). RESULTS: Quantification of the number of arteries, artery diameter, and blood flow proved highly reproducible in patients (CV = 2.6%, 4.5%, and 15.8% at interscan level and 9.0%, 8.2%, and 7.0% at interreader level, respectively). Reproducibility of DCE and BOLD MRI was poor in patients with a CV up to 50.9%. CONCLUSIONS: Quantification of the morphologic vascular status by contrast-enhanced MR angiography, as well as phase contrast angiography MRI to assess macrovascular blood flow proved highly reproducible in both PAD patients and healthy volunteers and might therefore be helpful in studying the development of collateral arteries in PAD patients and in unraveling the mechanisms underlying this process. Functional assessment of the microvascular status using DCE and BOLD, MRI did not prove reproducible at 1.5 T and is therefore currently not suitable for (clinical) application in PAD.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of the current study was to test the reproducibility of different quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) methods to assess the morphologic and functional peripheral vascular status and vascular adaptations over time in patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten patients with proven PAD (intermittent claudication) and arterial collateral formation within the upper leg and 10 healthy volunteers were included. All subjects underwent 2 identical MR examinations of the lower extremities on a clinical 1.5-T MR system, with a time interval of at least 3 days. The MR protocol consisted of 3D contrast-enhanced MR angiography to quantify the number of arteries and artery diameters of the upper leg, 2D cine MR phase contrast angiography flow measurements in the popliteal artery, dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) perfusion imaging to determine the influx constant and area under the curve, and dynamic blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) imaging in calf muscle to measure maximal relative T2* changes and time-to-peak. Data were analyzed by 2 independent MRI readers. Interscan and inter-reader reproducibility were determined as outcome measures and expressed as the coefficient of variation (CV). RESULTS: Quantification of the number of arteries, artery diameter, and blood flow proved highly reproducible in patients (CV = 2.6%, 4.5%, and 15.8% at interscan level and 9.0%, 8.2%, and 7.0% at interreader level, respectively). Reproducibility of DCE and BOLD MRI was poor in patients with a CV up to 50.9%. CONCLUSIONS: Quantification of the morphologic vascular status by contrast-enhanced MR angiography, as well as phase contrast angiography MRI to assess macrovascular blood flow proved highly reproducible in both PAD patients and healthy volunteers and might therefore be helpful in studying the development of collateral arteries in PAD patients and in unraveling the mechanisms underlying this process. Functional assessment of the microvascular status using DCE and BOLD, MRI did not prove reproducible at 1.5 T and is therefore currently not suitable for (clinical) application in PAD.
Authors: Sasan Partovi; Sasan Karimi; Bjoern Jacobi; Anja-Carina Schulte; Markus Aschwanden; Lisa Zipp; John K Lyo; Christof Karmonik; Matthias Müller-Eschner; Rolf W Huegli; Georg Bongartz; Deniz Bilecen Journal: MAGMA Date: 2012-02-29 Impact factor: 2.310
Authors: Erin K Englund; Michael C Langham; Sarah J Ratcliffe; Molly J Fanning; Felix W Wehrli; Emile R Mohler; Thomas F Floyd Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2015-04 Impact factor: 7.792
Authors: Bharath Ambale Venkatesh; Victor Nauffal; Chikara Noda; Tomoki Fujii; Phillip C Yang; Judy Bettencourt; Erin P Ricketts; Michael Murphy; Nicholas J Leeper; Lem Moyé; Ray F Ebert; Raja Muthupillai; David A Bluemke; Emerson C Perin; Alan T Hirsch; João A C Lima Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2016-10-02 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Emerson C Perin; Michael Murphy; John P Cooke; Lem Moyé; Timothy D Henry; Judy Bettencourt; Amir Gahremanpour; Nicholas Leeper; R David Anderson; William R Hiatt; Joao A Lima; Bharath Venkatesh; Shelly L Sayre; Rachel W Vojvodic; Doris A Taylor; Ray F Ebert; Alan T Hirsch Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2014-07-30 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Jie Zheng; Hongyu An; Andrew R Coggan; Xiaodong Zhang; Adil Bashir; David Muccigrosso; Linda R Peterson; Robert J Gropler Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2013-02-19 Impact factor: 4.668