Literature DB >> 21099612

Breast cancer screening in women at average risk and high risk.

Jennifer L Griffin1, Mark D Pearlman.   

Abstract

Recent controversies over the recommendations for breast cancer screening have created some uncertainty about the best methods of providing this care for women, particularly women at average risk for breast cancer. This article reviews the current recommendations for breast cancer screening from various national organizations and the scientific data behind these recommendations, and it highlights some of the controversies and the reasons behind the differing viewpoints. This article focuses on providing the obstetrician-gynecologist with evidence-based recommendations for counseling and screening women who are at average and high risk for breast cancer. The ability to identify women at higher risk for breast cancer and the appropriate clinical use of mammography, ultrasonography, MRI, clinical breast examination, and self-breast examination ("breast self-awareness") for breast cancer screening in these different populations are discussed. Finally, incorporating specific recommendations for breast cancer screening in women at average and high risk into practice are included.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21099612     DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181fe714e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  7 in total

1.  Coalition building and the intervention wheel to address breast cancer screening in hmong women.

Authors:  Jill L Depke; Adedayo A Onitilo
Journal:  Clin Med Res       Date:  2011-03

2.  Association between the NBS1 Glu185Gln polymorphism and breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Fan Yao; Yue Fang; Bo Chen; Feng Jin; Shubao Wang
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2013-02-05

3.  The influence of family history and histological stratification on breast cancer risk in women with benign breast disease: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Wen-Bin Zhou; Dan-Qing Xue; Xiao-An Liu; Qiang Ding; Shui Wang
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-04-17       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 4.  Current approaches and challenges in early detection of breast cancer recurrence.

Authors:  Erika J Schneble; Lindsey J Graham; Matthew P Shupe; Frederick L Flynt; Kevin P Banks; Aaron D Kirkpatrick; Aviram Nissan; Leonard Henry; Alexander Stojadinovic; Nathan M Shumway; Itzhak Avital; George E Peoples; Robert F Setlik
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2014-03-16       Impact factor: 4.207

5.  Predictors of adherence to COVID-19 prevention measure among communities in North Shoa Zone, Ethiopia based on health belief model: A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Sisay Shewasinad Yehualashet; Kokebe Kefelegn Asefa; Alemayehu Gonie Mekonnen; Belete Negess Gemeda; Wondimenh Shibabaw Shiferaw; Yared Asmare Aynalem; Awraris Hailu Bilchut; Behailu Tariku Derseh; Abinet Dagnaw Mekuria; Wassie Negash Mekonnen; Wondesen Asegidew Meseret; Sisay Shine Tegegnework; Akine Eshete Abosetegn
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-01-22       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  "High-Risk Breast Cancer Screening in BRCA1/2 Carriers Leads to Early Detection and Improved Survival After a Breast Cancer Diagnosis".

Authors:  Shay Shraga; Albert Grinshpun; Aviad Zick; Luna Kadouri; Yogev Cohen; Ofra Maimon; Yael Adler-Levy; Galina Zeltzer; Avital Granit; Bella Maly; Einat Carmon; Vardiella Meiner; Tamar Sella; Tamar Hamburger; Tamar Peretz
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-09-02       Impact factor: 6.244

7.  Awareness of the 2009 US Preventive Services Task Force recommended changes in mammography screening guidelines, accuracy of awareness, sources of knowledge about recommendations, and attitudes about updated screening guidelines in women ages 40-49 and 50+.

Authors:  Marc T Kiviniemi; Jennifer L Hay
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 3.295

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.