Literature DB >> 21099386

Supporting medical education research quality: the Association of American Medical Colleges' Medical Education Research Certificate program.

Larry D Gruppen1, Ernie Yoder, Ann Frye, Linda C Perkowski, Brian Mavis.   

Abstract

The quality of the medical education research (MER) reported in the literature has been frequently criticized. Numerous reasons have been provided for these shortcomings, including the level of research training and experience of many medical school faculty. The faculty development required to improve MER can take various forms. This article describes the Medical Education Research Certificate (MERC) program, a national faculty development program that focuses exclusively on MER. Sponsored by the Association of American Medical Colleges and led by a committee of established medical education researchers from across the United States, the MERC program is built on a set of 11 interactive workshops offered at various times and places across the United States. MERC participants can customize the program by selecting six workshops from this set to fulfill requirements for certification. This article describes the history, operations, current organization, and evaluation of the program. Key elements of the program's success include alignment of program content and focus with needs identified by prospective users, flexibility in program organization and logistics to fit participant schedules, an emphasis on practical application of MER principles in the context of the participants' activities and interests, consistency in program content and format to ensure standards of quality, and a sustainable financial model. The relationship between the national MERC program and local faculty development initiatives is also described. The success of the MERC program suggests that it may be a possible model for nationally disseminated faculty development programs in other domains.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21099386     DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181ffaf84

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Med        ISSN: 1040-2446            Impact factor:   6.893


  6 in total

1.  Role of graduate courses in promoting educational scholarship of health care professionals.

Authors:  Savithiri Ratnapalan; Abbas Ghavam-Rassoul
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  A Review of Programs, Components and Outcomes in Biomedical Research Faculty Development.

Authors:  Stacey A Teruya; Shahrzad Bazargan-Hejazi; Mona Mojtahedzadeh; Megha Doshi; Katherine Russell; Darlene Parker-Kelly; Theodore C Friedman
Journal:  Int J Univ Teach Fac Dev       Date:  2013

3.  A meaningful MESS (Medical Education Scholarship Support).

Authors:  Shari A Whicker; Deborah L Engle; Saumil Chudgar; Stephen DeMeo; Sarah M Bean; Aditee P Narayan; Colleen O'Connor Grochowski; Alisa Nagler
Journal:  Med Educ Online       Date:  2016-07-29

4.  Assessing changes in the quality of quantitative health educations research: a perspective from communities of practice.

Authors:  Katherine M Wright; Larry D Gruppen; Kevin W Kuo; Andrew Muzyk; Jeffry Nahmias; Darcy A Reed; Gurjit Sandhu; Anita V Shelgikar; Jennifer N Stojan; Toshiko L Uchida; Rebecca Wallihan; Larry Hurtubise
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 2.463

5.  Survey and analysis of the current state of residency training in medical-school-affiliated hospitals in China.

Authors:  Hong Bo; Dong-Hua Zhang; Tian-Ming Zuo; Dong-Bo Xue; Jin-Song Guo; Mei-Na Liu; Jing-Zhu Dong; Bao-Zhi Sun; Jin Zhou
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2014-06-02       Impact factor: 2.463

Review 6.  Characteristics of multi-institutional health sciences education research: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jocelyn Huang Schiller; Gary L Beck Dallaghan; Terry Kind; Heather McLauchlan; Joseph Gigante; Sherilyn Smith
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2017-10-01
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.