OBJECTIVE: Anesthesia provides sedation and immobility, facilitating echocardiography in mice, but it influences cardiovascular function and therefore outcomes of measurement. This study aimed to determine the effect of the optimal heart rate (HR) and anesthetic timing on echocardiographic reproducibility under isoflurane anesthesia. METHODS: Male C57BL/6J mice underwent high-resolution echocardiography with relative fixed HRs and anesthetic timing. The same experiment was repeated once again after 1 week. RESULTS: Echocardiography was highly reproducible in repeated measurements under low-HR (350-400 beats per minute [bpm]) and high-HR (475-525 bpm) conditions except some M-mode parameters under low-HR conditions. With similar anesthetic timing, mice with a high HR had decreased preload indices and increased ejection phase and Doppler indices. Inversely, when the HR was similar, the echocardiographic results of mice under short anesthetic timing showed little difference from the ones under long anesthetic timing. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that echocardiographic assessment is greatly reproducible under a high HR. The HR is more important than anesthetic timing for echocardiographic evaluation in mice.
OBJECTIVE: Anesthesia provides sedation and immobility, facilitating echocardiography in mice, but it influences cardiovascular function and therefore outcomes of measurement. This study aimed to determine the effect of the optimal heart rate (HR) and anesthetic timing on echocardiographic reproducibility under isoflurane anesthesia. METHODS: Male C57BL/6J mice underwent high-resolution echocardiography with relative fixed HRs and anesthetic timing. The same experiment was repeated once again after 1 week. RESULTS: Echocardiography was highly reproducible in repeated measurements under low-HR (350-400 beats per minute [bpm]) and high-HR (475-525 bpm) conditions except some M-mode parameters under low-HR conditions. With similar anesthetic timing, mice with a high HR had decreased preload indices and increased ejection phase and Doppler indices. Inversely, when the HR was similar, the echocardiographic results of mice under short anesthetic timing showed little difference from the ones under long anesthetic timing. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that echocardiographic assessment is greatly reproducible under a high HR. The HR is more important than anesthetic timing for echocardiographic evaluation in mice.
Authors: Vijayalakshmi Sridharan; John W Seawright; Reid D Landes; Maohua Cao; Preeti Singh; Catherine M Davis; Xiao-Wen Mao; Sharda P Singh; Xin Zhang; Gregory A Nelson; Marjan Boerma Journal: Life Sci Space Res (Amst) Date: 2020-05-22
Authors: Waleed G T Masoud; Osama Abo Al-Rob; Yang Yang; Gary D Lopaschuk; Alexander S Clanachan Journal: Cardiovasc Res Date: 2015-07-06 Impact factor: 10.787
Authors: Elisabet Domínguez; Jesús Ruberte; José Ríos; Rosa Novellas; Maria Montserrat Rivera Del Alamo; Marc Navarro; Yvonne Espada Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2014-05-23 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Catherine L Stables; David S Auerbach; Steven E Whitesall; Louis G D'Alecy; Eva L Feldman Journal: Auton Neurosci Date: 2015-12-17 Impact factor: 3.145
Authors: Ronald E Pachon; Bruce A Scharf; Dorothy E Vatner; Stephen F Vatner Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2015-04-10 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: Susan Bengs; Geoffrey I Warnock; Catherine Gebhard; Ahmed Haider; Angela Portmann; Nidaa Mikail; Alexia Rossi; Hazem Ahmed; Dominik Etter; Valerie Treyer; Livio Gisler; Stefanie K Pfister; Caitlin V M L Jie; Alexander Meisel; Claudia Keller; Steven H Liang; Roger Schibli; Linjing Mu; Ronny R Buechel; Philipp A Kaufmann; Simon M Ametamey Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2022-04-28 Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: Danielle L Shepherd; Cody E Nichols; Tara L Croston; Sarah L McLaughlin; Ashley B Petrone; Sara E Lewis; Dharendra Thapa; Dustin M Long; Gregory M Dick; John M Hollander Journal: J Mol Cell Cardiol Date: 2015-12-03 Impact factor: 5.000
Authors: Christopher R Daniels; Cerrone R Foster; Sana Yakoob; Suman Dalal; William L Joyner; Mahipal Singh; Krishna Singh Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2012-10-05 Impact factor: 4.733