Literature DB >> 21098442

Intracoronary versus intravenous administration of abciximab in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention with thrombus aspiration: the comparison of intracoronary versus intravenous abciximab administration during emergency reperfusion of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (CICERO) trial.

Youlan L Gu1, Marthe A Kampinga, Wouter G Wieringa, Marieke L Fokkema, Maarten W Nijsten, Hans L Hillege, Ad F M van den Heuvel, Eng-Shiong Tan, Gabija Pundziute, Rik van der Werf, Siyrous Hoseyni Guyomi, Iwan C C van der Horst, Felix Zijlstra, Bart J G L de Smet.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: administration of the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor abciximab is an effective adjunctive treatment strategy during primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Although small-scale studies have suggested beneficial effects of intracoronary over intravenous administration of abciximab, this has not been investigated in a medium-scale randomized clinical trial. METHODS AND
RESULTS: a total of 534 ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention with thrombus aspiration within 12 hours of symptom onset were randomized to either an intracoronary or an intravenous bolus of abciximab (0.25 mg/kg). Patients were pretreated with aspirin, heparin, and clopidogrel. The primary end point was the incidence of restored myocardial reperfusion, defined as complete ST-segment resolution. Secondary end points included myocardial reperfusion as assessed by myocardial blush grade, enzymatic infarct size, and major adverse cardiac events at 30 days. The incidence of complete ST-segment resolution was similar in the intracoronary and intravenous groups (64% versus 62%; P=0.562). However, the incidence of myocardial blush grade 2/3 was higher in the intracoronary group than in the intravenous group (76% versus 67%; P=0.022). Furthermore, enzymatic infarct size was smaller in the intracoronary than in the intravenous group (P=0.008). The incidence of major adverse cardiac events was similar in both groups (5.5% versus 6.1%; P=0.786).
CONCLUSIONS: in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention with thrombus aspiration, intracoronary administration of abciximab compared with intravenous administration does not improve myocardial reperfusion as assessed by ST-segment resolution. However, intracoronary administration is associated with improved myocardial reperfusion as assessed by myocardial blush grade and a smaller enzymatic infarct size.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21098442     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.002741

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  26 in total

1.  Platelet inhibition and GP IIb/IIIa receptor occupancy by intracoronary versus intravenous bolus administration of abciximab in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Steffen Desch; Annelie Siegemund; Ute Scholz; Natalie Adam; Ingo Eitel; Suzanne de Waha; Georg Fürnau; Philipp Lurz; Sabrina Wetzel; Gerhard Schuler; Holger Thiele
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2011-10-21       Impact factor: 5.460

Review 2.  Optimal use of platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor antagonists in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions.

Authors:  H Benjamin Starnes; Ankit A Patel; George A Stouffer
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2011-10-22       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  Advances in Coronary No-Reflow Phenomenon-a Contemporary Review.

Authors:  Ahmadreza Karimianpour; Anbukarasi Maran
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 5.113

4.  Myocardial salvage in acute myocardial infarction--challenges in clinical translation.

Authors:  Daria Mochly-Rosen; Kevin V Grimes
Journal:  J Mol Cell Cardiol       Date:  2011-08-12       Impact factor: 5.000

5.  Intracoronary versus intravenous high-dose bolus plus maintenance administration of tirofiban in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute ST elevation myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Basar Candemir; Mustafa Kilickap; Ozgur Ulas Ozcan; Cansin Tulunay Kaya; Menekse Gerede; Aydan Ongun Ozdemir; Cagdas Ozdol; Deniz Kumbasar; Cetin Erol
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 6.  Recent advances in the diagnosis and treatment of acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Koushik Reddy; Asma Khaliq; Robert J Henning
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2015-05-26

7.  Aspiration thrombectomy and intracoronary tirofiban in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction : Combination treatment for patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  T Geng; J-G Zhang; Z-Y Song; S-P Dai; Y Luo; Z-S Xu
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 1.443

8.  Multivessel coronary thrombosis in a patient with idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura.

Authors:  Julide Yagmur; Mehmet Cansel; Nusret Acikgoz; Murat Yagmur; Ferhat Eyupkoca; Necip Ermis; Erdal Akturk
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2012

Review 9.  Coronary thrombus in patients undergoing primary PCI for STEMI: Prognostic significance and management.

Authors:  Sabine Vecchio; Elisabetta Varani; Tania Chechi; Marco Balducelli; Giuseppe Vecchi; Matteo Aquilina; Giulia Ricci Lucchi; Alessandro Dal Monte; Massimo Margheri
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2014-06-26

Review 10.  Appropriate anti-thrombotic/anti-thrombin therapy for thrombotic lesions.

Authors:  Zafar Iqbal; Gurinder Rana; Marc Cohen
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rev       Date:  2012-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.