Literature DB >> 21098377

Use of blogs by pharmacists.

Kevin A Clauson1, Justine Ekins, Chilla E Goncz.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The characteristics of pharmacist blogs were examined.
METHODS: Internet search engines, blog aggregators, and blog rolls were used to identify pharmacist blogs. Six categories were developed to evaluate blogs, including practice-based topics, identifying information, positive language, critical language, professionalism, and miscellaneous. The most recent five posts on each pharmacist blog were reviewed. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize the results.
RESULTS: A total of 117 blogs were identified, 44 of which were designated as pharmacist blogs. No blogs contained patient-identifying information. Anonymity was maintained by 68.2% of bloggers. Bloggers practiced in community (43.1%) and noncommunity (43.1%) settings. Pharmacists most commonly used positive language to describe the profession (32%), other health care professionals (25%), and patients (25%). The highest rates of critical language were found in descriptions of patients (57%) and other health care professionals (44%). Almost half of pharmacist blogs contained explicit or unprofessional language. Overall, community practitioner blogs were substantially more likely than noncommunity practitioner blogs to use unprofessional and critical language. Twenty-five percent of pharmacist bloggers also maintained a microblog (e.g., Twitter) account.
CONCLUSION: A search using Internet search engines, blog aggregators, and blog rolls identified 117 blogs, 44 of which met the study criteria for designation as pharmacist blogs. The majority of pharmacist blogs included some type of discussion of pharmacologic therapies. Pharmacists most commonly used positive language to describe the profession, other health care professionals, and patients. The highest rates of critical language were found in descriptions of patients and other health care professionals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21098377     DOI: 10.2146/ajhp100065

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Health Syst Pharm        ISSN: 1079-2082            Impact factor:   2.637


  6 in total

Review 1.  Reviewing social media use by clinicians.

Authors:  Marcio von Muhlen; Lucila Ohno-Machado
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2012-07-03       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  How Twitter Is Studied in the Medical Professions: A Classification of Twitter Papers Indexed in PubMed.

Authors:  Shirley Ann Williams; Melissa Terras; Claire Warwick
Journal:  Med 2 0       Date:  2013-07-18

3.  A Quantitative Study on Anonymity and Professionalism within an Online Free Open Access Medical Education Community.

Authors:  Daneilla Dimitri; Andrea Gubert; Amanda B Miller; Brent Thoma; Teresa Chan
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2016-09-18

Review 4.  Social Media and Health Care (Part II): Narrative Review of Social Media Use by Patients.

Authors:  Deema Farsi; Hector R Martinez-Menchaca; Mohammad Ahmed; Nada Farsi
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 5.428

Review 5.  A new dimension of health care: systematic review of the uses, benefits, and limitations of social media for health communication.

Authors:  S Anne Moorhead; Diane E Hazlett; Laura Harrison; Jennifer K Carroll; Anthea Irwin; Ciska Hoving
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2013-04-23       Impact factor: 5.428

6.  Professional Use of Social Media by Pharmacists: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Arcelio Benetoli; Timothy Frank Chen; Marion Schaefer; Betty B Chaar; Parisa Aslani
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 5.428

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.