Literature DB >> 21098318

Gene expression signature to improve prognosis prediction of stage II and III colorectal cancer.

Ramon Salazar1, Paul Roepman, Gabriel Capella, Victor Moreno, Iris Simon, Christa Dreezen, Adriana Lopez-Doriga, Cristina Santos, Corrie Marijnen, Johan Westerga, Sjoerd Bruin, David Kerr, Peter Kuppen, Cornelis van de Velde, Hans Morreau, Loes Van Velthuysen, Annuska M Glas, Laura J Van't Veer, Rob Tollenaar.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study aims to develop a robust gene expression classifier that can predict disease relapse in patients with early-stage colorectal cancer (CRC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fresh frozen tumor tissue from 188 patients with stage I to IV CRC undergoing surgery was analyzed using Agilent 44K oligonucleotide arrays. Median follow-up time was 65.1 months, and the majority of patients (83.6%) did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy. A nearest mean classifier was developed using a cross-validation procedure to score all genes for their association with 5-year distant metastasis-free survival.
RESULTS: An optimal set of 18 genes was identified and used to construct a prognostic classifier (ColoPrint). The signature was validated on an independent set of 206 samples from patients with stage I, II, and III CRC. The signature classified 60% of patients as low risk and 40% as high risk. Five-year relapse-free survival rates were 87.6% (95% CI, 81.5% to 93.7%) and 67.2% (95% CI, 55.4% to 79.0%) for low- and high-risk patients, respectively, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 2.5 (95% CI, 1.33 to 4.73; P = .005). In multivariate analysis, the signature remained one of the most significant prognostic factors, with an HR of 2.69 (95% CI, 1.41 to 5.14; P = .003). In patients with stage II CRC, the signature had an HR of 3.34 (P = .017) and was superior to American Society of Clinical Oncology criteria in assessing the risk of cancer recurrence without prescreening for microsatellite instability (MSI).
CONCLUSION: ColoPrint significantly improves the prognostic accuracy of pathologic factors and MSI in patients with stage II and III CRC and facilitates the identification of patients with stage II disease who may be safely managed without chemotherapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21098318     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2010.30.1077

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  205 in total

1.  How Can Next-Generation Sequencing (Genomics) Help Us in Treating Colorectal Cancer?

Authors:  Kristen K Ciombor; Sigurdis Haraldsdottir; Richard M Goldberg
Journal:  Curr Colorectal Cancer Rep       Date:  2014-12-01

2.  Next-generation sequencing for cancer diagnostics: a practical perspective.

Authors:  Cliff Meldrum; Maria A Doyle; Richard W Tothill
Journal:  Clin Biochem Rev       Date:  2011-11

Review 3.  Recent progress and clinical importance on pharmacogenetics in cancer therapy.

Authors:  Thomas I Peng Soh; Wei Peng Yong; Federico Innocenti
Journal:  Clin Chem Lab Med       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  K-ras genetic mutation and influencing factor analysis for Han and Uygur nationality colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Mayinur Eli; Ablikim Mollayup; Chao Liu; Chao Zheng; Yong-Xing Bao
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-06-15

5.  Association Between Results of a Gene Expression Signature Assay and Recurrence-Free Interval in Patients With Stage II Colon Cancer in Cancer and Leukemia Group B 9581 (Alliance).

Authors:  Donna Niedzwiecki; Wendy L Frankel; Alan P Venook; Xing Ye; Paula N Friedman; Richard M Goldberg; Robert J Mayer; Thomas Anthony Colacchio; Jude Marie Mulligan; Timothy S Davison; Eamonn O'Brien; Peter Kerr; Patrick G Johnston; Richard D Kennedy; D Paul Harkin; Richard L Schilsky; Monica M Bertagnolli; Robert S Warren; Federico Innocenti
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 6.  Molecular markers predictive of chemotherapy response in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Stacey Shiovitz; William M Grady
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2015-02

7.  Biological markers: Tailoring treatment and trials to prognosis.

Authors:  David J Kerr; Yuankai Shi
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-06-11       Impact factor: 66.675

8.  High-resolution analysis of DNA copy number alterations in rectal cancer: correlation with metastasis, survival, and mRNA expression.

Authors:  Jérôme Doyen; Eric Letouzé; Laetitia Marisa; Aurélien de Reyniès; Gérard Milano; Marie-Christine Etienne-Grimaldi; Sylviane Olschwang; Jochen Gaedcke; Michael Ghadimi; Jean-Pierre Gérard
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2014-04-26       Impact factor: 3.621

9.  Poor-prognosis colon cancer is defined by a molecularly distinct subtype and develops from serrated precursor lesions.

Authors:  Felipe De Sousa E Melo; Xin Wang; Marnix Jansen; Evelyn Fessler; Anne Trinh; Laura P M H de Rooij; Joan H de Jong; Onno J de Boer; Ronald van Leersum; Maarten F Bijlsma; Hans Rodermond; Maartje van der Heijden; Carel J M van Noesel; Jurriaan B Tuynman; Evelien Dekker; Florian Markowetz; Jan Paul Medema; Louis Vermeulen
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2013-04-14       Impact factor: 53.440

10.  Imaging a functional tumorigenic biomarker in the transformed epithelium.

Authors:  Aaron M LeBeau; Minhee Lee; Stephanie T Murphy; Byron C Hann; Robert S Warren; Romelyn Delos Santos; John Kurhanewicz; Samir M Hanash; Henry F VanBrocklin; Charles S Craik
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-12-17       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.