INTRODUCTION: Research on the HIV vulnerability of men who have sex with men (MSM) in India has tended to focus on aggregates of individual risk behaviours. However, such an approach often overlooks the complexities in the sexual networks that ultimately underpin patterns of spread. This paper analyses a set of sexual contact network (SCN) snapshots in relation to ethnographic findings to reorientate individual-level explanations of risk behaviour in terms of more complex systems. METHODS: Fifteen community researchers conducted a 2-month ethnographic study in three cities in Karnataka to generate descriptions of the risk environments inhabited by MSM. SCNs were reconstructed by two methods. First, initial participants, defined as nodes of various sexual networks, were purposively sampled. In each site, six nodes brought in three sexual partners separately as participants. In all sites, 72 participants completed 431 surveys for their 7-day sexual partners. Second, each site determined four groups representing various sexual networks, each group containing four individuals. In all sites, 48 participants completed 334 surveys for their regular sexual partner. RESULTS: Considerable differences were observed between sites for practically all included behavioural variables. On their own, these characteristics yielded contradictory interpretations with respect to understanding contrasts in HIV prevalence at each site. However, viewing these variables in relation to SCNs and ethnographic data produced non-linear interpretations of HIV vulnerability which suggested importance to local interventions. CONCLUSION: SCN data may be used with existing data on risk behaviour and the structural determinants of vulnerability to re-tailor more tightly focused interventions.
INTRODUCTION: Research on the HIV vulnerability of men who have sex with men (MSM) in India has tended to focus on aggregates of individual risk behaviours. However, such an approach often overlooks the complexities in the sexual networks that ultimately underpin patterns of spread. This paper analyses a set of sexual contact network (SCN) snapshots in relation to ethnographic findings to reorientate individual-level explanations of risk behaviour in terms of more complex systems. METHODS: Fifteen community researchers conducted a 2-month ethnographic study in three cities in Karnataka to generate descriptions of the risk environments inhabited by MSM. SCNs were reconstructed by two methods. First, initial participants, defined as nodes of various sexual networks, were purposively sampled. In each site, six nodes brought in three sexual partners separately as participants. In all sites, 72 participants completed 431 surveys for their 7-day sexual partners. Second, each site determined four groups representing various sexual networks, each group containing four individuals. In all sites, 48 participants completed 334 surveys for their regular sexual partner. RESULTS: Considerable differences were observed between sites for practically all included behavioural variables. On their own, these characteristics yielded contradictory interpretations with respect to understanding contrasts in HIV prevalence at each site. However, viewing these variables in relation to SCNs and ethnographic data produced non-linear interpretations of HIV vulnerability which suggested importance to local interventions. CONCLUSION: SCN data may be used with existing data on risk behaviour and the structural determinants of vulnerability to re-tailor more tightly focused interventions.
Authors: John A Schneider; Stuart Michaels; Sabitha R Gandham; Rachel McFadden; Chuanhong Liao; Vijay V Yeldandi; Ganesh Oruganti Journal: AIDS Behav Date: 2012-02
Authors: John A Schneider; Benjamin Cornwell; David Ostrow; Stuart Michaels; Phil Schumm; Edward O Laumann; Samuel Friedman Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2012-11-15 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Sharmistha Mishra; Marie-Claude Boily; Sheree Schwartz; Chris Beyrer; James F Blanchard; Stephen Moses; Delivette Castor; Nancy Phaswana-Mafuya; Peter Vickerman; Fatou Drame; Michel Alary; Stefan D Baral Journal: Ann Epidemiol Date: 2016-06-15 Impact factor: 3.797
Authors: Souradet Y Shaw; Robert R Lorway; Kathleen N Deering; Lisa Avery; H L Mohan; Parinita Bhattacharjee; Sushena Reza-Paul; Shajy Isac; Banadakoppa M Ramesh; Reynold Washington; Stephen Moses; James F Blanchard Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-03-20 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: LaRon E Nelson; Leo Wilton; Thomas Agyarko-Poku; Nanhua Zhang; Yuanshu Zou; Marilyn Aluoch; Vanessa Apea; Samuel Owiredu Hanson; Yaw Adu-Sarkodie Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-01-30 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Lisa Lazarus; Ravi Prakash; Bernadette K Kombo; Matthew Thomann; Kennedy Olango; Martin K Ongaro; Samuel Kuria; Memory Melon; Helgar Musyoki; Souradet Shaw; Parinita Bhattacharjee; Robert Lorway Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2022-03-21 Impact factor: 4.135