Literature DB >> 21098041

Demographic and socioeconomic status differences in perceptions of difficulty with mobility in late life.

Jennifer C Cornman1, Dana Glei, Germán Rodríguez, Noreen Goldman, Baai-Shyun Hurng, Maxine Weinstein.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study assesses whether socioeconomic and demographic differences in reported mobility limitations are attributable to differential perceptions of mobility difficulty that result in the differential use of response categories.
METHODS: Data come from the Social Environment and Biomarkers of Aging Study and its parent study, the Taiwan Longitudinal Study of Aging. Ordered probit models with person-specific cut-points are used to test whether, after controlling for underlying mobility using objective performance measures, cut-points for reporting mobility limitations vary across groups defined by demographic and socioeconomic characteristics.
RESULTS: Age is the only characteristic that is consistently associated with the location of the cut-points for reporting mobility difficulty: At the same level of underlying mobility difficulty, older adults are more likely than younger adults are to report difficulty with all tasks except short walks. Other variables showed differences but only for one specific activity, for example, urban residents are more likely to report difficulty running than are rural residents with the same underlying level of mobility function. DISCUSSION: For most mobility activities, there are no systematic differences in the perception of difficulty by individual characteristics. Thus, for older Taiwanese adults, differences in mobility limitations associated with socioeconomic status are more likely to reflect underlying differences in function than differences in how these groups report the same capacity. The usual loss of mobility with age, however, reflects both a decrease in capacity and a lowering of the threshold for reporting difficulty.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21098041      PMCID: PMC3107021          DOI: 10.1093/geronb/gbq087

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci        ISSN: 1079-5014            Impact factor:   4.077


  24 in total

1.  Socio-economic and demographic variation in health and in its measures: the issue of reporting heterogeneity.

Authors:  Amir Shmueli
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.634

2.  At the tipping point: predicting severe mobility difficulty in vulnerable older women.

Authors:  Josette A Rivera; Linda P Fried; Carlos O Weiss; Eleanor M Simonsick
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 5.562

3.  Physical performance measures in aging research.

Authors:  J M Guralnik; L G Branch; S R Cummings; J D Curb
Journal:  J Gerontol       Date:  1989-09

4.  Gender differences in functioning for older adults in rural Bangladesh. The impact of differential reporting?

Authors:  M O Rahman; J Liu
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 6.053

Review 5.  Chinese values, health and nursing.

Authors:  Y C Chen
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.187

6.  Sit-to-stand performance depends on sensation, speed, balance, and psychological status in addition to strength in older people.

Authors:  Stephen R Lord; Susan M Murray; Kirsten Chapman; Bridget Munro; Anne Tiedemann
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 6.053

7.  The use of focus groups in evaluating quality of life components among elderly Chinese people.

Authors:  Kai-Kuen Leung; En-Chang Wu; Bee-Horng Lue; Li-Yu Tang
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  Is a fall just a fall: correlates of falling in healthy older persons. The Health, Aging and Body Composition Study.

Authors:  Nathalie de Rekeneire; Marjolein Visser; Rita Peila; Michael C Nevitt; Jane A Cauley; Frances A Tylavsky; Eleanor M Simonsick; Tamara B Harris
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 5.562

9.  Sex differentials in biological risk factors for chronic disease: estimates from population-based surveys.

Authors:  Noreen Goldman; Maxine Weinstein; Jennifer Cornman; Burton Singer; Teresa Seeman; Noreen Goldman; Ming-Cheng Chang
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.681

10.  Comparability of self rated health: cross sectional multi-country survey using anchoring vignettes.

Authors:  Joshua A Salomon; Ajay Tandon; Christopher J L Murray
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-01-23
View more
  9 in total

1.  Relaxation practice and physiologic regulation in a national sample of older Taiwanese.

Authors:  Dana A Glei; Noreen Goldman; Yu-Hsuan Lin; Maxine Weinstein
Journal:  J Altern Complement Med       Date:  2012-07-09       Impact factor: 2.579

2.  Changes in Physical Functioning as Short-Term Predictors of Mortality.

Authors:  Theresa Andrasfay
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 4.077

3.  Testing Proposed Quantifications of Biological Aging in Taiwanese Older Adults.

Authors:  Lauren Gaydosh; Daniel W Belsky; Dana A Glei; Noreen Goldman
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 6.053

4.  Physical Function in U.S. Older Adults Compared With Other Populations: A Multinational Study.

Authors:  Dana A Glei; Noreen Goldman; Carol D Ryff; Maxine Weinstein
Journal:  J Aging Health       Date:  2018-02-22

5.  Do interviewer and physician health ratings predict mortality?: a comparison with self-rated health.

Authors:  Megan A Todd; Noreen Goldman
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 4.822

6.  Apolipoprotein E and measured physical and pulmonary function in older Taiwanese adults.

Authors:  Sarinnapha Vasunilashorn; Dana A Glei; Yu-Hsuan Lin; Noreen Goldman
Journal:  Biodemography Soc Biol       Date:  2013

7.  Performance-based measures of physical function as mortality predictors: Incremental value beyond self-reports.

Authors:  Noreen Goldman; Dana A Glei; Luis Rosero-Bixby; Shu-Ti Chiou; Maxine Weinstein
Journal:  Demogr Res       Date:  2014-01-23

8.  How do Japanese rate the severity of different diseases and injuries?-an assessment of disability weights for 231 health states by 37,318 Japanese respondents.

Authors:  Shuhei Nomura; Yoshiko Yamamoto; Theo Vos; Kenji Shibuya; Daisuke Yoneoka; Juanita A Haagsma; Joshua A Salomon; Peter Ueda; Rintaro Mori; Damian Santomauro
Journal:  Popul Health Metr       Date:  2021-04-23

9.  Eliciting national and subnational sets of disability weights in mainland China: Findings from the Chinese disability weight measurement study.

Authors:  Xiaoxue Liu; Fang Wang; Chuanhua Yu; Maigeng Zhou; Yong Yu; Jinlei Qi; Peng Yin; Shicheng Yu; Yuchang Zhou; Lin Lin; Yunning Liu; Qiqi Wang; Wenling Zhong; Shaofen Huang; Yanxia Li; Li Liu; Yuan Liu; Fang Ma; Yine Zhang; Yuan Tian; Qiuli Yu; Jing Zeng; Jingju Pan; Mengge Zhou; Weiwei Kang; Jin-Yi Zhou; Hao Yu; Yuehua Liu; Shaofang Li; Huiting Yu; Chunfang Wang; Tian Xia; Jinen Xi; Xiaolan Ren; Xiuya Xing; Qianyao Cheng; Fangrong Fei; Dezheng Wang; Shuang Zhang; Yuling He; Haoyu Wen; Yan Liu; Fang Shi; Yafeng Wang; Panglin Sun; Jianjun Bai; Xuyan Wang; Hui Shen; Yudiyang Ma; Donghui Yang; Sumaira Mubarik; Jinhong Cao; Runtang Meng; Yunquan Zhang; Yan Guo; Yaqiong Yan; Wei Zhang; Sisi Ke; Runhua Zhang; Dingyi Wang; Tingting Zhang; Shuhei Nomura; Simon I Hay; Joshua A Salomon; Juanita A Haagsma; Christopher J L Murray; Theo Vos
Journal:  Lancet Reg Health West Pac       Date:  2022-07-26
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.