Literature DB >> 21097853

Unexpected changes in direction of motion attract attention.

Christina J Howard1, Alex O Holcombe.   

Abstract

Under some circumstances, moving objects capture attention. Whether a change in the direction of a moving object attracts attention is still unexplored. We investigated this using a continuous tracking task. In Experiment 1, four grating patches changed smoothly and semirandomly in their positions and orientations, and observers attempted to track the orientations of two of them. After the stimuli disappeared, one of the two target gratings was queried and observers reported its orientation; hence direction of the gratings' motion across the screen was an irrelevant feature. Despite the irrelevance of its motion, when the nonqueried grating had collided with an invisible boundary within the last 200 msec of the trial, accuracy reporting the queried grating was worse than when it had not. Attention was likely drawn by the unexpected nature of these changes in direction of motion, since the effect was eliminated when the boundaries were visible (Experiment 2). This tendency for unexpected motion changes to attract attention has important consequences for the monitoring of objects in everyday environments.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21097853     DOI: 10.3758/bf03196685

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  9 in total

1.  Statistical learning of visual transitions in monkey inferotemporal cortex.

Authors:  Travis Meyer; Carl R Olson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-11-14       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Changing target trajectories influences tracking performance.

Authors:  Justin M Ericson; Melissa R Beck
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-10

3.  Suppressed Sensory Response to Predictable Object Stimuli throughout the Ventral Visual Stream.

Authors:  David Richter; Matthias Ekman; Floris P de Lange
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Spatially uninformative sounds increase sensitivity for visual motion change.

Authors:  Sabine M Staufenbiel; Rob H J van der Lubbe; Durk Talsma
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-07-30       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Temporal fractals in movies and mind.

Authors:  James E Cutting; Jordan E DeLong; Kaitlin L Brunick
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2018-03-14

6.  Event-Based Eccentric Motion Detection Exploiting Time Difference Encoding.

Authors:  Giulia D'Angelo; Ella Janotte; Thorben Schoepe; James O'Keeffe; Moritz B Milde; Elisabetta Chicca; Chiara Bartolozzi
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2020-05-08       Impact factor: 4.677

7.  Tracking multiple fish.

Authors:  Filip Děchtěrenko; Daniela Jakubková; Jiří Lukavský; Christina J Howard
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 2.984

8.  Looking for trouble: a description of oculomotor search strategies during live CCTV operation.

Authors:  Matthew J Stainer; Kenneth C Scott-Brown; Benjamin W Tatler
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-30       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Oculomotor examination of the weapon focus effect: does a gun automatically engage visual attention?

Authors:  Heather D Flowe; Lorraine Hope; Anne P Hillstrom
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.