BACKGROUND: Hobart, Tasmania, has been the site of two major studies of multiple sclerosis (MS) frequency, in 1951-1961 and 1971-1981. Since then, there have been no studies of MS frequency in Hobart. METHODS: Using a prevalent cohort of 226 cases in 2001 and 265 in 2009, the authors undertook a two-stage survey of MS frequency in Hobart. Combined with the published data from the two preceding studies, the authors conducted a time-trend analysis of MS epidemiology over 1951-2009. RESULTS: The age-standardised prevalence in 2001 was 96.6/100 000, and 99.6/100 000 in 2009, a significant increase from the 1961 prevalence of 32.5/100 000 (p<0.001). Female prevalence increased over each time point; male prevalence increased between 1961 and 2001 but was unchanged thereafter. Incidence over 2001-2009 was 3.7/100 000, significantly increased from the 1951-1961 incidence of 2.2/100 000 (p=0.004), though the majority of this was between 1951-1961 and 1971-1981. Mortality fell by half from 2.4/100 000 in 1951-1959 to 1.0/100 000 in 2001-2009-this decreased mortality and an older cohort contribute to the increase in prevalence. Neither prevalence (p=0.48) nor incidence (p=0.18) sex ratios changed significantly between 1951 and 2009. CONCLUSIONS: Between 1951 and 2009, the age-standardised prevalence of MS in Hobart increased threefold, and the incidence nearly doubled. Part of the increase in prevalence was due to an increased longevity, decreased mortality and increased incidence. Differences in patterns by birthplace may be explained by the Australian assisted-migration programme of 1945-1981. These data do not demonstrate the strong and significant changes in sex ratio observed elsewhere.
BACKGROUND: Hobart, Tasmania, has been the site of two major studies of multiple sclerosis (MS) frequency, in 1951-1961 and 1971-1981. Since then, there have been no studies of MS frequency in Hobart. METHODS: Using a prevalent cohort of 226 cases in 2001 and 265 in 2009, the authors undertook a two-stage survey of MS frequency in Hobart. Combined with the published data from the two preceding studies, the authors conducted a time-trend analysis of MS epidemiology over 1951-2009. RESULTS: The age-standardised prevalence in 2001 was 96.6/100 000, and 99.6/100 000 in 2009, a significant increase from the 1961 prevalence of 32.5/100 000 (p<0.001). Female prevalence increased over each time point; male prevalence increased between 1961 and 2001 but was unchanged thereafter. Incidence over 2001-2009 was 3.7/100 000, significantly increased from the 1951-1961 incidence of 2.2/100 000 (p=0.004), though the majority of this was between 1951-1961 and 1971-1981. Mortality fell by half from 2.4/100 000 in 1951-1959 to 1.0/100 000 in 2001-2009-this decreased mortality and an older cohort contribute to the increase in prevalence. Neither prevalence (p=0.48) nor incidence (p=0.18) sex ratios changed significantly between 1951 and 2009. CONCLUSIONS: Between 1951 and 2009, the age-standardised prevalence of MS in Hobart increased threefold, and the incidence nearly doubled. Part of the increase in prevalence was due to an increased longevity, decreased mortality and increased incidence. Differences in patterns by birthplace may be explained by the Australian assisted-migration programme of 1945-1981. These data do not demonstrate the strong and significant changes in sex ratio observed elsewhere.
Authors: Victoria K Shanmugam; Amber Schilling; Anthony Germinario; Mihriye Mete; Paul Kim; John Steinberg; Christopher E Attinger Journal: Int Wound J Date: 2011-12-14 Impact factor: 3.315
Authors: Caila B Vaughn; Dejan Jakimovski; Katelyn S Kavak; Murali Ramanathan; Ralph H B Benedict; Robert Zivadinov; Bianca Weinstock-Guttman Journal: Nat Rev Neurol Date: 2019-06 Impact factor: 42.937
Authors: Maria Trojano; Guglielmo Lucchese; Giusi Graziano; Bruce V Taylor; Steve Simpson; Vito Lepore; Francois Grand'maison; Pierre Duquette; Guillermo Izquierdo; Pierre Grammond; Maria Pia Amato; Roberto Bergamaschi; Giorgio Giuliani; Cavit Boz; Raymond Hupperts; Vincent Van Pesch; Jeannette Lechner-Scott; Edgardo Cristiano; Marcela Fiol; Celia Oreja-Guevara; Maria Laura Saladino; Freek Verheul; Mark Slee; Damiano Paolicelli; Carla Tortorella; Mariangela D'Onghia; Pietro Iaffaldano; Vita Direnzo; Helmut Butzkueven Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-10-25 Impact factor: 3.240