Literature DB >> 21095484

Efficacy and tolerability of a generic and a branded formulation of atorvastatin 20 mg/d in hypercholesterolemic Korean adults at high risk for cardiovascular disease: a multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy clinical trial.

Sang-Hyun Kim1, Kyungil Park, Soon-Joon Hong, Young-Seok Cho, Ji-Dong Sung, Geon-Woong Moon, Myung-Ho Yoon, Moo-Yong Lee, Min-Su Hyon, Dong-Woon Kim, Hyo-Soo Kim.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The reduction in plasma LDL-C concentrations with 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitor (statin) therapy has been reported to reduce cardiovascular risk and mortality in individuals with or without preexisting coronary artery disease and elevated LDL-C concentrations. Atorvastatin is a statin used for lowering LDL-C concentrations. A generic formulation of atorvastatin is being developed in Korea. This study was undertaken for the purposes of marketing the generic formulation.
OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to compare the efficacy and tolerability of a generic formulation of atorvastatin 20 mg/d versus a branded formulation at the same dosage in hypercholesterolemic Korean adults at high risk for cardiovascular events.
METHODS: This 8-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy study was conducted at 10 clinical centers in Korea between September 2008 and May 2009. Male and female patients aged 20 to 85 years at high risk for cardiovascular events (defined as an elevated LDL-C concentration [≥100 mg/dL]) were enrolled. Eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive generic or branded atorvastatin 20 mg once daily for 8 weeks. The primary end point was the percentage change from baseline to 8 weeks in LDL-C concentration. Secondary end points were the percentage changes from baseline in total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TG), HDL-C, apolipoprotein (apo) A1 and B, and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein concentrations; small, dense LDL (sdLDL) fraction; and tolerability. Tolerability was assessed using physical examination, laboratory testing, and by recording adverse events (AEs) at each visit. An additional secondary end point was the proportion of patients who achieved an LDL-C goal of <100 mg/dL.
RESULTS: A total of 244 patients were randomized to treatment, and 33 patients were withdrawn from the study (9 patients did not receive the study medication, 11 patients due to AEs, and 13 patients due to withdrawal of consent). A total of 211 patients completed the study (50.7% male; 100% Asian; mean [SD] age, 61.7 [9.2] years) (106 patients in the group that received Accepted for publication October 5, 2010. the generic formulation and 105 patients in the group that received the branded formulation). LDL-C concentrations were reduced from the baseline by 44% and 46% after 8 weeks of treatment with the generic and branded formulations, respectively (P = NS). The percentage changes from baseline to study end in HDL-C, TC, TG, apo A1, apo B, and hsCRP concentrations and sdLDL fraction the proportions of patients who achieved the LDL-C goal between the 2 groups did not reach statistical significance. The most commonly reported events were hepatobiliary laboratory abnormality (1.7%), general somatic discomfort (1.7%), and epigastric pain (0.8%) in the group that received the generic formulation, and myalgia (1.7%), epigastric pain (0.9%), and elevation of creatinine phosphokinase (0.9%) in the group that received the branded formulation. No serious AEs were reported in either group.
CONCLUSIONS: After 8 weeks of treatment, the differences in the LDL-C-lowering effects between the generic and branded formulations of atorvastatin 20 mg/d did not reach statistical significance in these Korean patients at high risk for cardiovascular events. Both formulations were generally well tolerated.
Copyright © 2010 Excerpta Medica Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21095484     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2010.10.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Ther        ISSN: 0149-2918            Impact factor:   3.393


  10 in total

1.  Methodological Considerations for Comparison of Brand Versus Generic Versus Authorized Generic Adverse Event Reports in the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).

Authors:  Md Motiur Rahman; Yasser Alatawi; Ning Cheng; Jingjing Qian; Peggy L Peissig; Richard L Berg; David C Page; Richard A Hansen
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 2.859

2.  Are Generic Drugs Used in Cardiology as Effective and Safe as their Brand-name Counterparts? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jacinthe Leclerc; Magalie Thibault; Jennifer Midiani Gonella; Claudia Beaudoin; John Sampalis
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  Investigation into the interchangeability of generic formulations using immunosuppressants and a broad selection of medicines.

Authors:  Yang Yu; Steven Teerenstra; Cees Neef; David Burger; Marc Maliepaard
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015-06-12       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 4.  The Impact of Generic Substitution on Health and Economic Outcomes: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  H Gothe; I Schall; K Saverno; M Mitrovic; A Luzak; D Brixner; U Siebert
Journal:  Appl Health Econ Health Policy       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 2.561

5.  Cisplatin-induced hyponatremia in malignancy: comparison between brand-name and generic formulation.

Authors:  Nobuaki Ochi; Hiromichi Yamane; Katsuyuki Hotta; Hiromi Fujii; Hideko Isozaki; Yoshihiro Honda; Tomoko Yamagishi; Toshio Kubo; Mitsune Tanimoto; Katsuyuki Kiura; Nagio Takigawa
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 4.162

Review 6.  Generic versus brand-name drugs used in cardiovascular diseases.

Authors:  Lamberto Manzoli; Maria Elena Flacco; Stefania Boccia; Elvira D'Andrea; Nikola Panic; Carolina Marzuillo; Roberta Siliquini; Walter Ricciardi; Paolo Villari; John P A Ioannidis
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2015-11-30       Impact factor: 8.082

7.  Generic atorvastatin is as effective as the brand-name drug (LIPITOR®) in lowering cholesterol levels: a cross-sectional retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Alexander Loch; Jan Philipp Bewersdorf; Daniel Kofink; Dzafir Ismail; Imran Zainal Abidin; Ramesh Singh Veriah
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2017-07-17

8.  Efficacy and tolerability of two different formulations of atorvastatin in Korean patients with hypercholesterolemia: a multicenter, prospective, randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Ju-Hee Lee; Sang-Hyun Kim; Dong-Ju Choi; Seung-Jea Tahk; Jung-Han Yoon; Si Wan Choi; Taek-Jong Hong; Hyo-Soo Kim
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 4.162

9.  Efficacy of Generic Atorvastatin in a Real-World Setting.

Authors:  Panisa Manasirisuk; Nanthaphan Chainirun; Somsak Tiamkao; Sunee Lertsinudom; Kutcharin Phunikhom; Bundit Sawunyavisuth; Kittisak Sawanyawisuth
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2021-03-05

10.  Comparative Effectiveness of Generic Atorvastatin and Lipitor® in Patients Hospitalized with an Acute Coronary Syndrome.

Authors:  Cynthia A Jackevicius; Jack V Tu; Harlan M Krumholz; Peter C Austin; Joseph S Ross; Therese A Stukel; Maria Koh; Alice Chong; Dennis T Ko
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 5.501

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.