BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrosis is a hallmark of atrial structural remodeling (SRM) and leads to structural and functional impairment of left atrial (LA) and persistence of atrial fibrillation (AF). This study was conducted to assess LA reverse remodeling after catheter ablation of AF in mild and moderate-severe LA SRM. METHODS: Catheter ablation was performed in 68 patients (age 62 ± 14 years, 68% males) with paroxysmal (n = 26) and persistent (n = 42) AF. The patients were divided into group 1 with mild LA SRM (<10%, n = 31) and group 2 with moderate-severe LA SRM (>10%, n = 37) by delayed enhancement magnetic resonance imaging (DEMRI). Two-dimensional echocardiography, LA strain, and strain rate during left ventricular systole by velocity vector imaging were performed pre and at 6 ± 3 months postablation. The long-term outcome was monitored for 12 months. RESULTS: Patients in group 1 were younger (57 ± 15 vs 66 ± 13 years, P = .009) with a male predominance (80% vs 57%, P < .05) as compared to group 2. Postablation, group 1 had significant increase in average LA strain (Δ↑: 14% vs 4%, P < .05) and strain rate (Δ↑: 0.5 vs 0.1 cm/s, P < .05) as compared to group 2. There was a trend toward more patients with persistent AF in group 2 (68% vs 55%, P = .2), but it was not statistically significant. Group 2 had more AF recurrences (41% vs 16%, P = .02) at 12 months after ablation. CONCLUSION: Mild preablation LA SRM by DEMRI predicts favorable LA structural and functional reverse remodeling and long-term success after catheter ablation of AF, irrespective of the paroxysmal or persistent nature of AF.
BACKGROUND:Atrial fibrosis is a hallmark of atrial structural remodeling (SRM) and leads to structural and functional impairment of left atrial (LA) and persistence of atrial fibrillation (AF). This study was conducted to assess LA reverse remodeling after catheter ablation of AF in mild and moderate-severe LA SRM. METHODS: Catheter ablation was performed in 68 patients (age 62 ± 14 years, 68% males) with paroxysmal (n = 26) and persistent (n = 42) AF. The patients were divided into group 1 with mild LA SRM (<10%, n = 31) and group 2 with moderate-severe LA SRM (>10%, n = 37) by delayed enhancement magnetic resonance imaging (DEMRI). Two-dimensional echocardiography, LA strain, and strain rate during left ventricular systole by velocity vector imaging were performed pre and at 6 ± 3 months postablation. The long-term outcome was monitored for 12 months. RESULTS:Patients in group 1 were younger (57 ± 15 vs 66 ± 13 years, P = .009) with a male predominance (80% vs 57%, P < .05) as compared to group 2. Postablation, group 1 had significant increase in average LA strain (Δ↑: 14% vs 4%, P < .05) and strain rate (Δ↑: 0.5 vs 0.1 cm/s, P < .05) as compared to group 2. There was a trend toward more patients with persistent AF in group 2 (68% vs 55%, P = .2), but it was not statistically significant. Group 2 had more AF recurrences (41% vs 16%, P = .02) at 12 months after ablation. CONCLUSION: Mild preablation LA SRM by DEMRI predicts favorable LA structural and functional reverse remodeling and long-term success after catheter ablation of AF, irrespective of the paroxysmal or persistent nature of AF.
Authors: Hakan Oral; Carlo Pappone; Aman Chugh; Eric Good; Frank Bogun; Frank Pelosi; Eric R Bates; Michael H Lehmann; Gabriele Vicedomini; Giuseppe Augello; Eustachio Agricola; Simone Sala; Vincenzo Santinelli; Fred Morady Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2006-03-02 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Valentin Fuster; Lars E Rydén; David S Cannom; Harry J Crijns; Anne B Curtis; Kenneth A Ellenbogen; Jonathan L Halperin; Jean-Yves Le Heuzey; G Neal Kay; James E Lowe; S Bertil Olsson; Eric N Prystowsky; Juan Luis Tamargo; Samuel Wann; Silvia G Priori; Jean-Jacques Blanc; Andrzej Budaj; A John Camm; Veronica Dean; Jaap W Deckers; Catherine Despres; Kenneth Dickstein; John Lekakis; Keith McGregor; Marco Metra; João Morais; Ady Osterspey; José Luis Zamorano; Sidney C Smith; Alice K Jacobs; Cynthia D Adams; Jeffery L Anderson; Elliott M Antman; Sharon Ann Hunt; Rick Nishimura; Joseph P Ornato; Richard L Page; Barbara Riegel Journal: Rev Port Cardiol Date: 2007-04 Impact factor: 1.374
Authors: Suman S Kuppahally; Nazem Akoum; Nathan S Burgon; Troy J Badger; Eugene G Kholmovski; Sathya Vijayakumar; Swati N Rao; Joshua Blauer; Eric N Fish; Edward V R Dibella; Rob S Macleod; Christopher McGann; Sheldon E Litwin; Nassir F Marrouche Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2010-02-04 Impact factor: 7.792
Authors: Felix Gramley; Johann Lorenzen; Christian Knackstedt; Obaida R Rana; Erol Saygili; Dirk Frechen; Sven Stanzel; Francesco Pezzella; Eva Koellensperger; Christian Weiss; Thomas Münzel; Patrick Schauerte Journal: Age (Dordr) Date: 2008-10-07
Authors: Eleftherios M Kallergis; Emmanuel G Manios; Emmanuel M Kanoupakis; Hercules E Mavrakis; Dimitris A Arfanakis; Niki E Maliaraki; Chrisovalantis E Lathourakis; Gregory I Chlouverakis; Panos E Vardas Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2008-07-15 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Sung Il Im; Jin Oh Na; Sun Won Kim; Cheol Ung Choi; Jin Won Kim; Hwan Seok Yong; Eung Ju Kim; Seung-Woon Rha; Chang Gyu Park; Hong Seog Seo; Dong Joo Oh; Hong Euy Lim Journal: Tex Heart Inst J Date: 2015-06-01
Authors: Sandro Gelsomino; Fabiana Lucà; Carmelo Massimiliano Rao; Orlando Parise; Laurant Pison; Francis Wellens; Jos Maessen; Mark La Meir Journal: Ann Cardiothorac Surg Date: 2014-01
Authors: Leonard Bergau; Dirk Vollmann; Lars Luthje; Jan Martin Sohns; Joachim Seegers; Christian Sohns; Markus Zabel Journal: Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J Date: 2014-07-15