Literature DB >> 21094934

Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography and microperimetry findings in retinitis pigmentosa.

Stefano Lupo1, Pier Luigi Grenga, Enzo Maria Vingolo.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the relation between the optical coherence tomography (OCT) findings and retinal sensitivity in patients with retinitis pigmentosa (RP) by assessing the retinal thickness and retinal function using Fourier-domain OCT (FD-OCT) and microperimetry, respectively.
DESIGN: Observational case series.
METHODS: Fifty-nine patients (118 eyes) were enrolled, mean age 47 ± 14.8 years. Thirty-two healthy subjects (HS) were enrolled as a control group. Patients were assessed by means of FD-OCT and microperimetry. We analyzed the average foveal thickness (diameter of 1 mm centered on the point of fixation), the value of the retinal sensitivities corresponding to the 4 degrees centered on the fixation point, and logMAR visual acuity for regression analysis converted from Snellen chart.
RESULTS: We distinguished 4 groups of RP patients according to the macular pattern seen on OCT images. The first group of 36 eyes, mean age of 33.5 ± 7.4 years, had no macular changes, mean best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of 0.95 ± 0.07, mean foveal thickness of 256.3 ± 9.14 μm, and mean retinal sensitivities inside the central 4 degrees of 19.27 ± 0.87 dB (P > .05 for all the values). The second group of 28 eyes, mean age 35.4 ± 6.3 years, showed clinical macular edema (CME) on OCT images with mean BCVA of 0.72 ± 0.22, mean foveal thickness of 363.5 ± 93.45 μm, and mean retinal sensitivity inside the central 4 degrees of 15.94 ± 3.6 dB (P < .01 for all the values). The third group of 26 eyes, mean age 50.8 ± 8.7 years, showed macular vitreoretinal traction on OCT images with a mean BCVA of 0.5 ± 0.2, mean foveal thickness of 337.1 ± 71.7 μm, and mean retinal sensitivity inside the central 4 degrees of 11.78 ± 3.09 dB (P < .01 for all the values). The last group of 28 eyes, mean age 52.1 ± 13.6 years, showed macular retinal thinning on OCT images with mean BCVA of 0.36 ± 0.15, mean foveal thickness of 174.2 ± 24.40 μm, and mean retinal sensitivity inside the central 4 degrees of 10.22 ± 3.82 dB (P < .01 for all the values).
CONCLUSIONS: MP-1 and FD-OCT showed high sensitivity for identifying functional and structural macular abnormalities, respectively. Future studies should investigate the relationships among photoreceptor cell loss, retinal sensitivity, and fixation in patients with RP.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21094934     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2010.07.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0002-9394            Impact factor:   5.258


  21 in total

1.  Macular integrity assessment to determine the association between macular microstructure and functional parameters in diabetic macular edema.

Authors:  Jian-Wei Wang; Chuan-Hong Jie; Yong-Jian Tao; Ning Meng; Yuan-Chun Hu; Zheng-Zheng Wu; Wen-Jing Cai; Xi-Mei Gong
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-07-18       Impact factor: 1.779

2.  Abnormal stereopsis and reduced retinal sensitivity in patients with retinitis pigmentosa.

Authors:  Enzo Maria Vingolo; Paolo Giuseppe Limoli; Robert Davis Jr Steigerwalt; Sandra Cinzia Carlesimo; Serena Salvatore
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 2.031

3.  Unilateral retinitis pigmentosa: a proposal of genetic pathogenic mechanisms.

Authors:  Marcela Marsiglia; Tobias Duncker; Enrico Peiretti; Scott E Brodie; Stephen H Tsang
Journal:  Eur J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.597

4.  Vitreo-macular interface disorders in retinitis pigmentosa.

Authors:  Serena Fragiotta; Tommaso Rossi; Carmela Carnevale; Alessandro Cutini; Stefano Tricarico; Lorenzo Casillo; Gianluca Scuderi; Enzo Maria Vingolo
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-07-19       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Monthly microperimetry (MP1) measurement of macular sensitivity after dexamethasone implantation (Ozurdex) in retinal vein occlusions.

Authors:  Sibylle Winterhalter; Gerrit Alexander Vom Brocke; Matthias K Klamann; Bert Müller; Antonia M Joussen
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-01-11       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  Correlation of structure and function of the macula in patients with retinitis pigmentosa.

Authors:  R Battu; A Khanna; B Hegde; T T J M Berendschot; S Grover; J S A G Schouten
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2015-05-08       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 7.  Understanding the role of microperimetry in glaucoma.

Authors:  Luca Scuderi; Irene Gattazzo; Alessandro de Paula; Clemente Maria Iodice; Federico Di Tizio; Andrea Perdicchi
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-01-30       Impact factor: 2.029

Review 8.  A challenge to the striking genotypic heterogeneity of retinitis pigmentosa: a better understanding of the pathophysiology using the newest genetic strategies.

Authors:  F S Sorrentino; C E Gallenga; C Bonifazzi; P Perri
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 3.775

9.  Clinical and Rehabilitative Management of Retinitis Pigmentosa: Up-to-Date.

Authors:  Francesco Parmeggiani; Giovanni Sato; Katia De Nadai; Mario R Romano; Andrea Binotto; Ciro Costagliola
Journal:  Curr Genomics       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 2.236

10.  Diagnostic challenges in retinitis pigmentosa: genotypic multiplicity and phenotypic variability.

Authors:  Susie Chang; Leah Vaccarella; Sunday Olatunji; Colleen Cebulla; John Christoforidis
Journal:  Curr Genomics       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 2.236

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.