STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare perioperative outcomes during laparoscopic myomectomy using a bidirectional barbed suture vs conventional smooth suture. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of 138 consecutive laparoscopic myomectomies performed by a single surgeon over 3 years (Canadian Task Force classification II-2). SETTING: Major university teaching hospital. PATIENTS: One hundred thirty-eight women with symptomatic uterine myomas. INTERVENTIONS: In women undergoing laparoscopic myomectomy from February 2007 through April 2010, conventional smooth sutures were used in 31 patients, and bidirectional barbed suture in 107 patients. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary indications for laparoscopic myomectomy in either group were pelvic pain or pressure and abnormal uterine bleeding. Use of bidirectional barbed suture was found to significantly shorten the mean (SD) duration of surgery (118 [53] minutes vs 162 [69] minutes; p <.05) and reduce the duration of hospital stay (0.58 [0.46] days vs 0.97 [0.45] days; p <.05). No significant differences were observed between the 2 groups insofar as incidence of perioperative complications, estimated blood loss, and number or weight of myomas removed during surgery. CONCLUSION: Use of bidirectional barbed suture seems to facilitate closure of the hysterotomy site in laparoscopic myomectomy. Copyright Â
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare perioperative outcomes during laparoscopic myomectomy using a bidirectional barbed suture vs conventional smooth suture. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of 138 consecutive laparoscopic myomectomies performed by a single surgeon over 3 years (Canadian Task Force classification II-2). SETTING: Major university teaching hospital. PATIENTS: One hundred thirty-eight women with symptomatic uterine myomas. INTERVENTIONS: In women undergoing laparoscopic myomectomy from February 2007 through April 2010, conventional smooth sutures were used in 31 patients, and bidirectional barbed suture in 107 patients. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary indications for laparoscopic myomectomy in either group were pelvic pain or pressure and abnormal uterine bleeding. Use of bidirectional barbed suture was found to significantly shorten the mean (SD) duration of surgery (118 [53] minutes vs 162 [69] minutes; p <.05) and reduce the duration of hospital stay (0.58 [0.46] days vs 0.97 [0.45] days; p <.05). No significant differences were observed between the 2 groups insofar as incidence of perioperative complications, estimated blood loss, and number or weight of myomas removed during surgery. CONCLUSION: Use of bidirectional barbed suture seems to facilitate closure of the hysterotomy site in laparoscopic myomectomy. Copyright Â
Authors: Vito De Blasi; Olivier Facy; Martine Goergen; Virginie Poulain; Luigi De Magistris; Juan Santiago Azagra Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2013-01 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Jin Hwi Kim; Seung Won Byun; Jae Yeon Song; Yeon Hee Kim; Hee Joong Lee; Tae Chul Park; Keun Ho Lee; Soo Young Hur; Jong Sup Park; Sung Jong Lee Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) Date: 2016-09 Impact factor: 1.889