Literature DB >> 21094037

An analysis of research activity in major UK cancer centres.

R Sullivan1, G Lewison, A D Purushotham.   

Abstract

The organisation of cancer research is critical to its overall creativity and productivity. Cancer centres are a major organisational structure for this research, however, little is known about their effect on research or how national policy-making intersects with this complex policy nexus. This study of the evolution of United Kingdom cancer centres (UKCC), part of a wider European and United States programme, uses a bibliometric analysis of research activity prior to the creation of the NCRI and after its formation (1995-2004/5). In terms of critical research mass UKCC are very heterogeneous with a fourfold difference between the top and bottom quintiles. UK centres published just over one eighth of the total UKCC in 1995 but almost a quarter by 2004. This centrification occurred in the absence of any national strategy. Overall these centres conduct more fundamental (laboratory-based) research than that being conducted in the wider network but this hides major heterogeneity. UKCC collaborate with European investigators in 5-28% of all their outputs and with USA the range is between 6% and 21%. We have also derived new measures of research impact on clinical management and the general public as well as the impact of national policy on research assessment for certain types of cancer research.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21094037     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2010.10.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  5 in total

1.  Collective health research assessment: developing a tool to measure the impact of multistakeholder research initiatives.

Authors:  Anna-Aurora Kork; Carla Antonini; Nicolás García-Torea; Mercedes Luque-Vílchez; Ericka Costa; Juliette Senn; Carlos Larrinaga; Deborah Bertorello; Giampaolo Brichetto; Paola Zaratin; Michele Andreaus
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2022-05-02

Review 2.  A narrative review of research impact assessment models and methods.

Authors:  Andrew J Milat; Adrian E Bauman; Sally Redman
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2015-03-18

Review 3.  Evaluating cancer research impact: lessons and examples from existing reviews on approaches to research impact assessment.

Authors:  Catherine R Hanna; Kathleen A Boyd; Robert J Jones
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2021-03-11

4.  Tracing the indirect societal impacts of biomedical research: development and piloting of a technique based on citations.

Authors:  Teresa H Jones; Steve Hanney
Journal:  Scientometrics       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 3.238

5.  Differential research impact in cancer practice guidelines' evidence base: lessons from ESMO, NICE and SIGN.

Authors:  Elena Pallari; Anthony W Fox; Grant Lewison
Journal:  ESMO Open       Date:  2018-01-06
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.