Literature DB >> 21094010

Semi-automated volumetric analysis of artificial lymph nodes in a phantom study.

M Fabel1, J Biederer, A Jochens, L Bornemann, G Soza, M Heller, H Bolte.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Quantification of tumour burden in oncology requires accurate and reproducible image evaluation. The current standard is one-dimensional measurement (e.g. RECIST) with inherent disadvantages. Volumetric analysis is discussed as an alternative for therapy monitoring of lung and liver metastases. The aim of this study was to investigate the accuracy of semi-automated volumetric analysis of artificial lymph node metastases in a phantom study.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty artificial lymph nodes were produced in a size range from 10 to 55mm; some of them enhanced using iodine contrast media. All nodules were placed in an artificial chest phantom (artiCHEST®) within different surrounding tissues. MDCT was performed using different collimations (1-5 mm) at varying reconstruction kernels (B20f, B40f, B60f). Volume and RECIST measurements were performed using Oncology Software (Siemens Healthcare, Forchheim, Germany) and were compared to reference volume and diameter by calculating absolute percentage errors.
RESULTS: The software performance allowed a robust volumetric analysis in a phantom setting. Unsatisfying segmentation results were frequently found for native nodules within surrounding muscle. The absolute percentage error (APE) for volumetric analysis varied between 0.01 and 225%. No significant differences were seen between different reconstruction kernels. The most unsatisfactory segmentation results occurred in higher slice thickness (4 and 5 mm). Contrast enhanced lymph nodes showed better segmentation results by trend.
CONCLUSION: The semi-automated 3D-volumetric analysis software tool allows a reliable and convenient segmentation of artificial lymph nodes in a phantom setting. Lymph nodes adjacent to tissue of similar density cause segmentation problems. For volumetric analysis of lymph node metastases in clinical routine a slice thickness of ≤3mm and a medium soft reconstruction kernel (e.g. B40f for Siemens scan systems) may be a suitable compromise for semi-automated volumetric analysis.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21094010     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.10.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Radiol        ISSN: 0720-048X            Impact factor:   3.528


  6 in total

1.  Volumetric assessment of lymph node metastases in patients with non-seminomatous germ cell tumours treated with chemotherapy.

Authors:  Carlos I Basilio-de-Leo; Christian I Villeda-Sandoval; Carolina Culebro-García; Francisco Rodríguez-Covarrubias; Ricardo A Castillejos-Molina
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  Quantitative and volumetric European Association for the Study of the Liver and Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors measurements: feasibility of a semiautomated software method to assess tumor response after transcatheter arterial chemoembolization.

Authors:  MingDe Lin; Olivier Pellerin; Nikhil Bhagat; Pramod P Rao; Romaric Loffroy; Roberto Ardon; Benoit Mory; Diane K Reyes; Jean-François Geschwind
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.464

3.  Preclinical multimodality phantom design for quality assurance of tumor size measurement.

Authors:  Yongsook C Lee; Gary D Fullerton; Cristel Baiu; Margaret G Lescrenier; Beth A Goins
Journal:  BMC Med Phys       Date:  2011-09-30

4.  Specimen acquisition training with a new biosimulator in endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration.

Authors:  Takahiro Nakajima; Taiki Fujiwara; Fumie Saegusa; Terunaga Inage; Yuichi Sakairi; Hironobu Wada; Hidemi Suzuki; Takekazu Iwata; Shigetoshi Yoshida; Yukio Nakatani; Ichiro Yoshino
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.889

5.  Assessment of Volumetric versus Manual Measurement in Disseminated Testicular Cancer; No Difference in Assessment between Non-Radiologists and Genitourinary Radiologist.

Authors:  Çiğdem Öztürk; Ton Velleman; Alphons H H Bongaerts; L M Bergman; Robert J van Ginkel; Jourik A Gietema; Harald J Hoekstra
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Automated continuous quantitative measurement of proximal airways on dynamic ventilation CT: initial experience using an ex vivo porcine lung phantom.

Authors:  Tsuneo Yamashiro; Maho Tsubakimoto; Yukihiro Nagatani; Hiroshi Moriya; Kotaro Sakuma; Shinsuke Tsukagoshi; Hiroyasu Inokawa; Tatsuya Kimoto; Ryuichi Teramoto; Sadayuki Murayama
Journal:  Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis       Date:  2015-09-25
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.