Literature DB >> 21093527

How strong is the evidence for the need to restore posterior bounded edentulous spaces in adults? Grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations.

Clovis Mariano Faggion1, Nikolaos Nikitas Giannakopoulos, Stefan Listl.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It is unclear whether or not untreated bounded edentulous spaces (BES) can cause patients problems because of migration of unopposed and adjacent teeth.
OBJECTIVES: To quantitatively assess BES-related occlusal changes and the level of evidence available.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A systematic search of the literature was conducted in triplicate in the PubMed and Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) databases up to and including February 2010 to assess studies related to the topic. The LILACS database also was searched by one of the authors (CMF). Quantitative mesio-distal changes and overeruption were the outcome measures. Manual searching of the reference lists of studies retrieved from the electronic databases was also conducted. Google Scholar in English, French, German, Greek, Italian, Portuguese, and Spanish was also searched to retrieve potential studies. Grey literature was searched in OpenSIGLE (System for Information on Grey Literature in Europe) for more potential papers. The quality of the retrieved literature and the strength of recommendations were assessed by use of the GRADE system. A decision-tree-like scheme was produced to depict treatment options.
RESULTS: The available evidence demonstrated that for most cases occlusal changes in BES after tooth loss might be limited (on average up to 2mm). The quality of evidence was regarded as very low, however.
CONCLUSIONS: Tooth replacement should not necessarily be regarded as the mainstay of therapy for posterior BES, although more robust studies are necessary to clarify the long-term effects of non-treatment. The GRADE approach may be useful for enhancing the transparency of the decision-making process in dentistry, especially when evidence of only limited quality is available. Copyright Â
© 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21093527     DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2010.11.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dent        ISSN: 0300-5712            Impact factor:   4.379


  4 in total

1.  Large-scale clinical endodontic research in the National Dental Practice-Based Research Network: study overview and methods.

Authors:  Donald R Nixdorf; Alan S Law; John O Look; D Brad Rindal; Emily U Durand; Wenjun Kang; Bonita S Agee; Jeffrey L Fellows; Valeria V Gordan; Gregg H Gilbert
Journal:  J Endod       Date:  2012-09-11       Impact factor: 4.171

2.  The clinical prognosis of implants that are placed against super-erupted opposing dentition.

Authors:  Young-Kyun Kim; Kyo-Jin Ahn; Pil-Young Yun; Yang-Jin Yi; Su-Gwan Kim
Journal:  J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2016-06-27

3.  Exploring motivations to seek and undergo prosthodontic care: a cross-sectional study in a Brazilian adult sample.

Authors:  Antonio Hélio Vieira; Donizete Castro E Silva; Túlio Eduardo Nogueira; Cláudio Rodrigues Leles
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 2.711

4.  Does fixed retention prevent overeruption of unopposed mandibular second molars in maxillary first molar extraction cases?

Authors:  Christos Livas; Demetrios J Halazonetis; Johan W Booij; Christos Katsaros; Yijin Ren
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 2.750

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.