Literature DB >> 21093423

Clinical performance of a new point-of-care cardiac troponin I assay compared to three laboratory troponin assays.

Søren Hjortshøj1, Per Venge, Jan Ravkilde.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Studies of cardiac markers in diagnosing acute myocardial infarction (AMI) have mostly been performed using central laboratory platforms. The AQT90 FLEX TnI (troponin I) assay is designed for quantitative point of care testing (POCT). This study evaluated clinical performance in diagnosing AMI of the AQT90 FLEX TnI POCT assay compared with central laboratory troponin assays.
METHODS: The study included 458 chest pain patients. Blood samples were obtained on admission and after 6-9h. Blood was analyzed using the following assays: AQT90 FLEX TnI, Access AccuTnI, Abbott AxSYM ADV, Roche cTnT, Roche CKMBmass. Patients were diagnosed with AMI according to the new universal definition of AMI.
RESULTS: The performance of the AQT90 FLEX TnI assay on admission was equivalent to the Abbott AxSYM ADV cTnI but inferior to the AccuTnI. After 6-9 h both laboratory based assays were superior. The AQT90 FLEX TnI had a negative predictive value (NPV) of 90 and 96% (admission; 6-9 h). No statistical differences were seen in receiver operating characteristics analysis.
CONCLUSIONS: The AQT90 FLEX TnI POCT assay was marginally inferior to the two laboratory based assays of cTnI in diagnosing AMI. A high (NPV) may make this assay suitable as a rule out marker.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21093423     DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2010.11.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Chim Acta        ISSN: 0009-8981            Impact factor:   3.786


  3 in total

1.  High-sensitivity detection of cardiac troponin I with UV LED excitation for use in point-of-care immunoassay.

Authors:  Olga Rodenko; Susann Eriksson; Peter Tidemand-Lichtenberg; Carl Peder Troldborg; Henrik Fodgaard; Sylvana van Os; Christian Pedersen
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 3.732

2.  Point of care technology or standard laboratory service in an emergency department: is there a difference in time to action? A randomised trial.

Authors:  Christian B Mogensen; Anders Borch; Ivan Brandslund
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2011-09-10       Impact factor: 2.953

3.  Diagnostic performance of point-of-care and central laboratory cardiac troponin assays in an emergency department.

Authors:  Petra Wilke; Annette Masuch; Oliver Fahron; Stephanie Zylla; Tobias Leipold; Astrid Petersmann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.