Literature DB >> 21093348

Material characterization of ex vivo prostate tissue via spherical indentation in the clinic.

William C Carson1, Gregory J Gerling, Tracey L Krupski, Casey G Kowalik, Jeffrey C Harper, Christopher A Moskaluk.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The mechanical characterization of prostate tissue has not received much attention and is often disconnected from the clinic, where samples are readily attained.
METHODS: We developed a spherical indenter for the clinic to generate force-displacement data from ex vivo prostate tissue. Indentation velocity, depth, and sphere diameter, and four means of estimating elastic modulus (EM) were validated. EM was then estimated for 26 prostate specimens obtained via prostatectomy and 6 samples obtained from autopsy. Prostatectomy prostates were evaluated clinically upon digital rectal exam and pathologically post-extirpation.
FINDINGS: Whole-mount measurements yielded median EM of 43.2 kPa (SD=59.8 kPa). Once sliced into cross-sections, median EM for stage T2 and T3 glands were 30.9 and 71.0 kPa, respectively, but not significantly different. Furthermore, we compared within-organ EM difference for prostates with (median=46.5 kPa, SD=22.2 kPa) and without (median=31.0 kPa, SD=63.1 kPa) palpable abnormalities.
INTERPRETATION: This work finds that diseased prostate tissue is stiffer than normal tissue, stiffness increases with disease severity, and large variability exists between samples, even though disease differences within a prostate are detectable. A further study of late-stage cancers would help to strengthen the findings presented in this work.
Copyright © 2010 IPEM. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21093348     DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2010.10.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Eng Phys        ISSN: 1350-4533            Impact factor:   2.242


  13 in total

Review 1.  Clinical practice guidelines for ultrasound elastography: prostate.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 1.314

2.  Local property characterization of prostate glands using inhomogeneous modeling based on tumor volume and location analysis.

Authors:  Yeongjin Kim; Bummo Ahn; Jae Won Lee; Koon Ho Rha; Jung Kim
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2012-11-11       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Advanced ultrasound in the diagnosis of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jean-Michel Correas; Ethan J Halpern; Richard G Barr; Sangeet Ghai; Jochen Walz; Sylvain Bodard; Charles Dariane; Jean de la Rosette
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-04-18       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Force-Rate Cues Reduce Object Deformation Necessary to Discriminate Compliances Harder than the Skin.

Authors:  Steven Conrad Hauser; Gregory John Gerling; Steven Conrad Hauser; Gregory John Gerling; Gregory John Gerling; Steven Conrad Hauser
Journal:  IEEE Trans Haptics       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 2.487

Review 5.  Application of Multiple Ultrasonic Techniques in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Yushan Liu; Shi Zeng; Ran Xu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 5.738

6.  Measuring tactile cues at the fingerpad for object compliances harder and softer than the skin.

Authors:  Steven C Hauser; Gregory J Gerling
Journal:  IEEE Haptics Symp       Date:  2016-04

7.  In the Tactile Discrimination of Compliance, Perceptual Cues in Addition to Contact Area Are Required.

Authors:  Chang Xu; Yuxiang Wang; Steven C Hauser; Gregory J Gerling
Journal:  Proc Hum Factors Ergon Soc Annu Meet       Date:  2018-09-27

8.  Assessment of elasticity of colorectal cancer tissue, clinical utility, pathological and phenotypical relevance.

Authors:  Shingo Kawano; Motohiro Kojima; Yoichi Higuchi; Motokazu Sugimoto; Koji Ikeda; Naoki Sakuyama; Shinichiro Takahashi; Ryuichi Hayashi; Atsushi Ochiai; Norio Saito
Journal:  Cancer Sci       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 6.716

9.  Tissue quality assessment using a novel direct elasticity assessment device (the E-finger): a cadaveric study of prostatectomy dissection.

Authors:  Daniel W Good; Ashfaq Khan; Steven Hammer; Paul Scanlan; Wenmiao Shu; Simon Phipps; Simon H Parson; Grant D Stewart; Robert Reuben; S Alan McNeill
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-10       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  How to Study Basement Membrane Stiffness as a Biophysical Trigger in Prostate Cancer and Other Age-related Pathologies or Metabolic Diseases.

Authors:  Mercedes Rodriguez-Teja; Claudia Breit; Mitchell Clarke; Kamil Talar; Kai Wang; Mohammad A Mohammad; Sage Pickwell; Guillermina Etchandy; Graeme J Stasiuk; Justin Sturge
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 1.355

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.