Literature DB >> 21093194

Towards client-centered counseling: development and testing of the WHO Decision-Making Tool.

Sarah L Johnson1, Young Mi Kim, Kathryn Church.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe development and testing of a counseling tool intended to inform family planning clients while helping the family planning provider facilitate the client's decision-making process; and to discuss challenges and requisites for shifting to shared decision-making from the extremes of decision-making dominated by the provider, on one hand, or unaided by the provider, on the other. DEVELOPMENT OF THE TOOL: The WHO Decision-Making Tool for Family Planning Clients and Providers is derived from evidence-based principles of client-centered care and counseling. This article discusses how these principles are manifested in the Tool and how the Tool aids both provider and client in improving counseling.
METHODS: Development of the Tool involved formative workshops with providers in Indonesia, Mexico, South Africa and Trinidad and Tobago and observational evaluation research in Indonesia, Mexico, and Nicaragua. Analysis of videotaped counseling sessions quantitatively assessed client-provider communication and decision-making. Also, focus-group discussions, interviews, and a questionnaire collected qualitative data from providers and clients.
RESULTS: In general, use of the Tool improved providers' counseling performance: they engaged clients more and gave more and better tailored information. For clients, the Tool increased their communication and involvement. Both the Nicaraguan and Mexican studies found marked shifts toward the client in the locus of decision-making after introduction of the Tool. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Use of the tool improves the performance of both providers and clients in family planning counseling and decision-making. There are challenges, however, at the levels of both the provider and the organization in sustaining these changes and scaling up such initiatives in quality of care.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21093194     DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2010.10.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Patient Educ Couns        ISSN: 0738-3991


  10 in total

Review 1.  Contraceptive counseling: best practices to ensure quality communication and enable effective contraceptive use.

Authors:  Christine Dehlendorf; Colleen Krajewski; Sonya Borrero
Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 2.190

2.  Communication in reproductive health: intimate topics and challenging conversations.

Authors:  Christine Dehlendorf; Ward Rinehart
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2010-11-26

3.  Dissemination and use of WHO family planning guidance and tools: a qualitative assessment.

Authors:  Joan Marie Kraft; Titilope Oduyebo; Tara C Jatlaoui; Kathryn M Curtis; Maura K Whiteman; Lauren B Zapata; Mary Eluned Gaffield
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2018-05-22

4.  Interventions to improve participation in health-care decisions in non-Western countries: A systematic review and narrative synthesis.

Authors:  Hankiz Dolan; Mu Li; Lyndal Trevena
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2019-06-09       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 5.  Leveraging the Client-Provider Interaction to Address Contraceptive Discontinuation: A Scoping Review of the Evidence That Links Them.

Authors:  Kendal Danna; Alexandra Angel; Jamee Kuznicki; Laetitia Lemoine; Klaira Lerma; Amanda Kalamar
Journal:  Glob Health Sci Pract       Date:  2021-12-21

Review 6.  Understanding how and under what circumstances decision coaching works for people making healthcare decisions: a realist review.

Authors:  Junqiang Zhao; Janet Jull; Jeanette Finderup; Maureen Smith; Simone Maria Kienlin; Anne Christin Rahn; Sandra Dunn; Yumi Aoki; Leanne Brown; Gillian Harvey; Dawn Stacey
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2022-10-08       Impact factor: 3.298

Review 7.  Women's values in contraceptive choice: a systematic review of relevant attributes included in decision aids.

Authors:  Kirk D Wyatt; Ryan T Anderson; Douglas Creedon; Victor M Montori; John Bachman; Patricia Erwin; Annie LeBlanc
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2014-02-13       Impact factor: 2.809

8.  End-user involvement in developing and field testing an online contraceptive decision aid.

Authors:  Truus Hooiveld; Joyce M Molenaar; Claudia M van der Heijde; Frans J Meijman; Theo P Groen; Peter Vonk
Journal:  SAGE Open Med       Date:  2018-11-02

9.  Women's preferences for contraceptive counseling in Mexico: Results from a focus group study.

Authors:  Kelsey Holt; Icela Zavala; Ximena Quintero; Doroteo Mendoza; Marie C McCormick; Christine Dehlendorf; Ellice Lieberman; Ana Langer
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2018-07-16       Impact factor: 3.223

10.  Quality of family planning services for women of reproductive age in Lao PDR.

Authors:  Souksamone Thongmixay; Tess Schoneveld; Viengnakhone Vongxay; Jacqueline E W Broerse; Vanphanom Sychareun; Dirk R Essink
Journal:  Glob Health Action       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 2.640

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.