PURPOSE: Immunotherapy could be a useful adjunct to standard cytotoxic therapies such as radiation in patients with micrometastatic disease, although successful integration of immunotherapy into treatment protocols will require further understanding of how standard therapies affect the generation of antitumor immune responses. This study was undertaken to evaluate the impact of radiation therapy (RT) on immunosuppressive T regulatory (Treg) cells. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Treg cells were identified as a CD4(+)CD25(hi)Foxp3(+) lymphocyte subset, and their fate was followed in a murine TRAMP C1 model of prostate cancer in mice with and without RT. RESULTS: CD4(+)CD25(hi)Foxp3(+) Treg cells increased in immune organs after local leg or whole-body radiation. A large part, but not all, of this increase after leg-only irradiation could be ascribed to radiation scatter and Treg cells being intrinsically more radiation resistant than other lymphocyte subpopulations, resulting in their selection. Their functional activity on a per-cell basis was not affected by radiation exposure. Similar findings were made with mice receiving local RT to murine prostate tumors growing in the leg. The importance of the Treg cell population in the response to RT was shown by systemic elimination of Treg cells, which greatly enhanced radiation-induced tumor regression. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that Treg cells are more resistant to radiation than other lymphocytes, resulting in their preferential increase. Treg cells may form an important homeostatic mechanism for tissues injured by radiation, and in a tumor context, they may assist in immune evasion during therapy. Targeting this population may allow enhancement of radiotherapeutic benefit through immune modulation.
PURPOSE: Immunotherapy could be a useful adjunct to standard cytotoxic therapies such as radiation in patients with micrometastatic disease, although successful integration of immunotherapy into treatment protocols will require further understanding of how standard therapies affect the generation of antitumor immune responses. This study was undertaken to evaluate the impact of radiation therapy (RT) on immunosuppressive T regulatory (Treg) cells. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Treg cells were identified as a CD4(+)CD25(hi)Foxp3(+) lymphocyte subset, and their fate was followed in a murine TRAMP C1 model of prostate cancer in mice with and without RT. RESULTS:CD4(+)CD25(hi)Foxp3(+) Treg cells increased in immune organs after local leg or whole-body radiation. A large part, but not all, of this increase after leg-only irradiation could be ascribed to radiation scatter and Treg cells being intrinsically more radiation resistant than other lymphocyte subpopulations, resulting in their selection. Their functional activity on a per-cell basis was not affected by radiation exposure. Similar findings were made with mice receiving local RT to murineprostate tumors growing in the leg. The importance of the Treg cell population in the response to RT was shown by systemic elimination of Treg cells, which greatly enhanced radiation-induced tumor regression. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that Treg cells are more resistant to radiation than other lymphocytes, resulting in their preferential increase. Treg cells may form an important homeostatic mechanism for tissues injured by radiation, and in a tumor context, they may assist in immune evasion during therapy. Targeting this population may allow enhancement of radiotherapeutic benefit through immune modulation.
Authors: Mei-Ling Chen; Mikaël J Pittet; Leonid Gorelik; Richard A Flavell; Ralph Weissleder; Harald von Boehmer; Khashayarsha Khazaie Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2004-12-27 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Tyler J Curiel; George Coukos; Linhua Zou; Xavier Alvarez; Pui Cheng; Peter Mottram; Melina Evdemon-Hogan; Jose R Conejo-Garcia; Lin Zhang; Matthew Burow; Yun Zhu; Shuang Wei; Ilona Kryczek; Ben Daniel; Alan Gordon; Leann Myers; Andrew Lackner; Mary L Disis; Keith L Knutson; Lieping Chen; Weiping Zou Journal: Nat Med Date: 2004-08-22 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Steven N Seyedin; Jonathan E Schoenhals; Dean A Lee; Maria A Cortez; Xiaohong Wang; Sharareh Niknam; Chad Tang; David S Hong; Aung Naing; Padmanee Sharma; James P Allison; Joe Y Chang; Daniel R Gomez; John V Heymach; Ritsuko U Komaki; Laurence J Cooper; James W Welsh Journal: Immunotherapy Date: 2015-08-27 Impact factor: 4.196
Authors: Frank P Vendetti; Pooja Karukonda; David A Clump; Troy Teo; Ronald Lalonde; Katriana Nugent; Matthew Ballew; Brian F Kiesel; Jan H Beumer; Saumendra N Sarkar; Thomas P Conrads; Mark J O'Connor; Robert L Ferris; Phuoc T Tran; Greg M Delgoffe; Christopher J Bakkenist Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2018-08-13 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: A Gentil Dit Maurin; C Lemercier; V Collin-Faure; P N Marche; E Jouvin-Marche; S M Candéias Journal: Clin Exp Immunol Date: 2015-01 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: Tobin Strom; Louis B Harrison; Anna R Giuliano; Michael J Schell; Steven A Eschrich; Anders Berglund; William Fulp; Ram Thapa; Domenico Coppola; Sungjune Kim; Jessica Frakes; John Foekens; James J Mulé; Javier F Torres-Roca Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2017-08-29 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: Patrick J Schuler; Malgorzata Harasymczuk; Bastian Schilling; Zenichiro Saze; Laura Strauss; Stephan Lang; Jonas T Johnson; Theresa L Whiteside Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2013-10-04 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Brian M Olson; Ewa Jankowska-Gan; Jordan T Becker; Dario A A Vignali; William J Burlingham; Douglas G McNeel Journal: J Immunol Date: 2012-11-14 Impact factor: 5.422