Literature DB >> 21092745

Implied motion from static photographs influences the perceived position of stationary objects.

Andrea Pavan1, Luigi F Cuturi, Marcello Maniglia, Clara Casco, Gianluca Campana.   

Abstract

A growing amount of evidence suggests that viewing a photograph depicting motion activates the same direction-selective neurons involved in the perception of real motion. It has been shown that prolonged exposure (adaptation) to photographs depicting directional motion can induce motion adaptation and consequently motion aftereffect. The present study investigated whether adapting to photographs depicting humans, animals, and vehicles that move leftward or rightward also generates a positional aftereffect (the motion-induced position shift--MIPS), in which the perceived spatial position of a target pattern is shifted in the opposite direction to that of adaptation. Results showed that adapting to still photographs depicting objects that move in a particular direction shifts the perceived position of subsequently presented stationary objects opposite to the depicted adaptation direction and that this effect depends on the retinotopic location of the adapting stimulus. These results suggest that the implied motion could activate the same direction-selective and speed-tuned mechanisms that produce positional aftereffect when viewing real motion.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21092745     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2010.11.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  7 in total

1.  Inferring the direction of implied motion depends on visual awareness.

Authors:  Nathan Faivre; Christof Koch
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-04-04       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 2.  Forms of momentum across space: representational, operational, and attentional.

Authors:  Timothy L Hubbard
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-12

3.  Decision-level adaptation in motion perception.

Authors:  George Mather; Rebecca J Sharman
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 2.963

4.  Interactions between motion and form processing in the human visual system.

Authors:  George Mather; Andrea Pavan; Rosilari Bellacosa Marotti; Gianluca Campana; Clara Casco
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2013-05-20       Impact factor: 2.380

5.  Flexible Orientation Tuning of Visual Representations of Human Body Postures: Evidence From Long-Term Priming.

Authors:  Karl Verfaillie; Anja Daems
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-03-10

6.  Extension of Dancer's Legs: Increasing Angles Show Motion.

Authors:  Stefano Mastandrea; John M Kennedy
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-01-04

7.  The implied motion aftereffect changes decisions, but not confidence.

Authors:  Regan M Gallagher; Thomas Suddendorf; Derek H Arnold
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-08-24       Impact factor: 2.199

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.