Literature DB >> 21092367

Genetic variation in taste perception: does it have a role in healthy eating?

E Feeney1, S O'Brien, A Scannell, A Markey, E R Gibney.   

Abstract

Taste is often cited as the factor of greatest significance in food choice, and has been described as the body's 'nutritional gatekeeper'. Variation in taste receptor genes can give rise to differential perception of sweet, umami and bitter tastes, whereas less is known about the genetics of sour and salty taste. Over twenty-five bitter taste receptor genes exist, of which TAS2R38 is one of the most studied. This gene is broadly tuned to the perception of the bitter-tasting thiourea compounds, which are found in brassica vegetables and other foods with purported health benefits, such as green tea and soya. Variations in this gene contribute to three thiourea taster groups of people: supertasters, medium tasters and nontasters. Differences in taster status have been linked to body weight, alcoholism, preferences for sugar and fat levels in food and fruit and vegetable preferences. However, genetic predispositions to food preferences may be outweighed by environmental influences, and few studies have examined both. The Tastebuddies study aimed at taking a holistic approach, examining both genetic and environmental factors in children and adults. Taster status, age and gender were the most significant influences in food preferences, whereas genotype was less important. Taster perception was associated with BMI in women; nontasters had a higher mean BMI than medium tasters or supertasters. Nutrient intakes were influenced by both phenotype and genotype for the whole group, and in women, the AVI variation of the TAS2R38 gene was associated with a nutrient intake pattern indicative of healthy eating.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21092367     DOI: 10.1017/S0029665110003976

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Nutr Soc        ISSN: 0029-6651            Impact factor:   6.297


  36 in total

1.  A genome-wide association study of bitter and sweet beverage consumption.

Authors:  Victor W Zhong; Alan Kuang; Rebecca D Danning; Peter Kraft; Rob M van Dam; Daniel I Chasman; Marilyn C Cornelis
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2019-07-15       Impact factor: 6.150

2.  Multidimensional Evaluation of Endogenous and Health Factors Affecting Food Preferences, Taste and Smell Perception.

Authors:  D Guido; S Perna; M Carrai; R Barale; M Grassi; M Rondanelli
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 4.075

3.  The duration of intermittent access to preferred sucrose-rich food affects binge-like intake, fat accumulation, and fasting glucose in male rats.

Authors:  A D Kreisler; M Mattock; E P Zorrilla
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2018-07-29       Impact factor: 3.868

4.  Genetic differences in the behavioral organization of binge eating, conditioned food reward, and compulsive-like eating in C57BL/6J and DBA/2J strains.

Authors:  Richard K Babbs; Julia C Kelliher; Julia L Scotellaro; Kimberly P Luttik; Megan K Mulligan; Camron D Bryant
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2018-09-24

5.  Cross-cultural validation of a taste test with paper strips.

Authors:  João Carlos Ribeiro; Mariana Chaves; Carolina Chaves; Lisete Lemos; Eduardo D Silva; António Paiva; Thomas Hummel
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-04-12       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Bitter taste phenotype and body weight predict children's selection of sweet and savory foods at a palatable test-meal.

Authors:  Kathleen L Keller; Annemarie Olsen; Terri L Cravener; Rachel Bloom; Wendy K Chung; Liyong Deng; Patricia Lanzano; Karol Meyermann
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 3.868

7.  Variation in the gene TAS2R13 is associated with differences in alcohol consumption in patients with head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Cedrick D Dotson; Margaret R Wallace; Linda M Bartoshuk; Henrietta L Logan
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2012-07-23       Impact factor: 3.160

8.  Genetic taste blindness to bitter and body composition in childhood: a Mendelian randomization design.

Authors:  S H Bouthoorn; F J van Lenthe; J C Kiefte-de Jong; H R Taal; A I Wijtzes; A Hofman; V W V Jaddoe; M M Glymour; F Rivadeneira; H Raat
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2013-07-31       Impact factor: 5.095

Review 9.  Reconceptualizing anorexia nervosa.

Authors:  Cynthia M Bulik; Rachael Flatt; Afrouz Abbaspour; Ian Carroll
Journal:  Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 5.188

10.  TAS2R38 PAV Haplotype Predicts Vegetable Consumption in Community-Dwelling Caucasian Adults at Risk for Cardiovascular Disease.

Authors:  Jennifer L Smith; Steven Estus; Terry A Lennie; Debra K Moser; Misook L Chung; Gia Mudd-Martin
Journal:  Biol Res Nurs       Date:  2020-03-24       Impact factor: 2.522

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.