Literature DB >> 21092069

Molybdenum isotope fractionation by cyanobacterial assimilation during nitrate utilization and N₂ fixation.

A L Zerkle1, K Scheiderich, J A Maresca, L J Liermann, S L Brantley.   

Abstract

We measured the δ⁹⁸Mo of cells and media from molybdenum (Mo) assimilation experiments with the freshwater cyanobacterium Anabaena variabilis, grown with nitrate as a nitrogen (N) source or fixing atmospheric N₂. This organism uses a Mo-based nitrate reductase during nitrate utilization and a Mo-based dinitrogenase during N₂ fixation under culture conditions here. We also demonstrate that it has a high-affinity Mo uptake system (ModABC) similar to other cyanobacteria, including marine N₂-fixing strains. Anabaena variabilis preferentially assimilated light isotopes of Mo in all experiments, resulting in fractionations of -0.2‰ to -1.0‰ ± 0.2‰ between cells and media (ε(cells-media)), extending the range of biological Mo fractionations previously reported. The fractionations were internally consistent within experiments, but varied with the N source utilized and for different growth phases sampled. During growth on nitrate, A. variabilis consistently produced fractionations of -0.3 ± 0.1‰ (mean ± standard deviation between experiments). When fixing N₂, A. variabilis produced fractionations of -0.9 ± 0.1‰ during exponential growth, and -0.5 ± 0.1‰ during stationary phase. This pattern is inconsistent with a simple kinetic isotope effect associated with Mo transport, because Mo is likely transported through the ModABC uptake system under all conditions studied. We present a reaction network model for Mo isotope fractionation that demonstrates how Mo transport and storage, coordination changes during enzymatic incorporation, and the distribution of Mo inside the cell could all contribute to the total biological fractionations. Additionally, we discuss the potential importance of biologically incorporated Mo to organic matter-bound Mo in marine sediments.
© 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21092069      PMCID: PMC3627308          DOI: 10.1111/j.1472-4669.2010.00262.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Geobiology        ISSN: 1472-4669            Impact factor:   4.407


Introduction

Molybdenum (Mo) is the most abundant transition metal in modern seawater, occurring dominantly as the molybdate anion (MoO42−), at an average oceanic concentration of ∼105 nm (Emerson & Huested, 1991; Morford & Emerson, 1999). Molybdenum is supplied to the oceans primarily via riverine input from oxidative weathering on the continents. The dominant sinks for Mo are ferromanganese oxides deposited in oxygenated waters (accounting for ∼35% of modern marine Mo removal; Scott ), and, most significantly, conversion to particle-reactive thiomolybdates and removal by sorption onto organic matter and other reduced substrates in the presence of sulfide (e.g., McManus ). Molybdenum has seven naturally occurring stable isotopes, with measurable mass-dependent variations that occur in natural systems (see reviews in Anbar, 2004; Anbar & Rouxel, 2007). As a result of the high concentration and long residence time of Mo in modern oceans (∼800 000 years; Collier, 1985; Emerson & Huested, 1991) seawater has a uniform isotopic composition of +2.3‰ in δ98Mo ((98/95Mosample/98/95Mostandard−1) × 1000) (Barling ; Siebert ). Marine sediments, on the other hand, show a wide range of δ98Mo (e.g., Poulson ; Siebert ) reflecting multiple processes and sources (see review in Poulson Brucker ). The largest isotope effects to date (−3‰) have been measured during adsorption of Mo to Mn-oxides and Fe(oxyhydr)oxides (Siebert ; Barling & Anbar, 2004; Wasylenki ; Goldberg ), concentrating isotopically-light Mo in ferromanganese sediments deposited in oxic settings (e.g., Barling ). In contrast, in euxinic basins with free sulfide in the water column, Mo is nearly completely removed into the sediments such that no fractionation from the seawater value is expressed (Barling ; Arnold ; Nägler ). The variation in Mo removal processes and associated isotopic signatures under different redox settings formed the basis of early models of Mo isotopes in ancient black shales as a paleoredox proxy (e.g., Arnold ). In this simple model, euxinic sediments were assumed to capture the δ98Mo of overlying seawater, reflecting the proportion of the global burial of Mo in oxic vs. euxinic sinks. Recent measurements of sedimentary Mo isotope values in ‘suboxic’ environments (defined here as having low bottom-water O2, but lacking free sulfide in the water column) show δ98Mo values between oxic and euxinic settings, complicating this simple interpretation (e.g., Poulson Brucker ). These low O2 sediments have δ98Mo values that are depleted in 98Mo from overlying seawater by ∼0.7–2‰ (Poulson ; Siebert ). The dominant controls on the fractionations produced in these environments are not well constrained, but could reflect Fe-Mn-S systematics (Barling ; Siebert ; Reitz ; Wasylenki ), transitions between oxic and sulfidic Mo species (Tossel, 2005), or interactions with organic matter (e.g., McManus ). A significant amount of Mo is associated with organic matter in marine systems, both incorporated into cells and sorbed to organic particles in the water column (e.g., Tribovillard ). Biologically, Mo is an essential micronutrient for all three domains of life, serving as a cofactor for enzymes involved in carbon, nitrogen, and sulfur metabolisms (Frausto da Silva and Williams, 2001). Most significantly, Mo plays a prominent role in enzymes involved in the nitrogen cycle (see reviews in Zhang & Gladyshev, 2008; Glass ), acting as metal cofactor for the primary enzyme utilized in nitrate assimilation (nitrate reductase) and for one component of the dominant nitrogenase enzyme complex utilized in nitrogen fixation (dinitrogenase) (Miller & Eady, 1988; Howard & Rees, 1996). Dinitrogenases containing Mo have been isolated from numerous prokaryotes, including both bacteria and archaea, some of which are fungal and plant endosymbionts (see review in Howard & Rees, 1996). All known N2-fixing organisms (diazotrophs) utilize a dinitrogenase with an iron-molybdenum (Fe-Mo) cofactor, containing 2 moles of Mo per mole of enzyme complex (Howard & Rees, 1996). When Mo is scarce, some organisms can produce two homologous alternative dinitrogenases, containing either an iron-vanadium cofactor or a cofactor containing only Fe (Eady, 1996). The alternate enzymes have been found only secondarily to the Mo-containing dinitrogenase in a subset of organisms, and are significantly less efficient than the primary enzyme (Joerger & Bishop, 1988; Miller & Eady, 1988). Some diazotrophs, including Anabaena variabilis, can also produce a different Fe-Mo-dependent dinitrogenase under anoxic conditions (Thiel , 1997; Thiel & Pratte, 2001). Biological fractionations of Mo are not well constrained. Previous work has focused on cultures of the N2-fixing soil bacterium Azotobacter vinelandii (Liermann ; Wasylenki ). One group reported fractionations during Mo assimilation in cultures of the marine N2-fixing cyanobacterium Trichodesmium sp. IMS 101, but these results were only published in a conference abstract (Nägler ) and have not been expanded upon since. These studies have demonstrated that bacteria can concentrate the light isotopes of Mo during uptake, producing measurable fractionations (Table 1). However, Azotobacter vinelandii has two unique or rare biochemical strategies for the uptake and storage of Mo, including the production of Mo-chelating ligands, or ‘molybdophores’, for the scavenging of Mo in terrestrial systems (Liermann ; Bellenger ), and the possession of a rare Mo storage protein (MoSto), which can store up to ∼80 atoms of Mo as a Mo-oxide aggregate (Pienkos & Brill, 1981; Fenske ; Schemberg , 2008). Azotobacter vinelandii also utilizes a periplasmic Mo-binding protein ModA, which is part of the high-affinity Mo uptake system ModABC, that shows weak sequence similarity but similar structure to the periplasmic Mo-binding proteins of freshwater cyanobacteria (Zahalak ). The fractionations produced by Azotobacter vinelandii have been linked to molybdophore chelation and/or to binding by this ModA protein (Liermann ; Wasylenki ), and therefore could differ significantly from fractionations produced in aqueous organisms with different uptake strategies. In order to extrapolate biological fractionations to aqueous sedimentary systems, it is necessary to further examine fractionations associated with Mo assimilation in aqueous organisms, particularly in cyanobacteria, which are the dominant source of fixed N to the modern biosphere (Capone ; Zehr ; Montoya ), and have likely been fixing N2 since early in geologic time (e.g., Kasting & Siefert, 2001; Tomitani ).
Table 1

Compilation of previous studies of biological Mo isotope fractionations (in ‰), along with this study (± analytical or given 2σ). Also shown are the N source, initial [Mo] (when reported), Mo source (glass or aqueous Mo), growth phase (as reported), and the number of individual analyses reported (not including duplicates) (n)

OrganismTypeN source[Mo], sourceGrowth phaseδ98Mo fractionationnRef.
Trichodesmium sp.Marine cyanobacteriumN2Not given, [Mo]aqEarly, late−0.5, −0.1 ± 0.121
Azotobacter vinelandiiSoil bacteriumNH31.5 μm, glassNot given−0.8 ± 0.4*52
Azotobacter vinelandiiSoil bacteriumNH3, N2∼1 μm, [Mo]aqNot given−0.5 ± 0.2*113
Anabaena variabilisFw cyanobacteriumNO31.6 μm, [Mo]aqLate exp., stationary−0.3, −0.3 ± 0.274
Anabaena variabilisFw cyanobacteriumN21.7 μm, [Mo]aqExp., stationary−0.9, −0.5 ± 0.274

1, Nägler (reported only in an abstract from conference proceedings); 2, Liermann ; 3, Wasylenki , 4. This study

Values converted from δ97/95Mo to δ98/95Mo, assuming δ97/95Mo ∼ 2/3 δ98/95Mo

Compilation of previous studies of biological Mo isotope fractionations (in ‰), along with this study (± analytical or given 2σ). Also shown are the N source, initial [Mo] (when reported), Mo source (glass or aqueous Mo), growth phase (as reported), and the number of individual analyses reported (not including duplicates) (n) 1, Nägler (reported only in an abstract from conpan class="Chemical">ference proceedings); 2, Liermann ; 3, Wn>an class="Chemical">asylenki , 4. This study Values converted from δ97/95Mo to δ98/95Mo, pan class="Chemical">assuming δ97/95Mo ∼ 2/3 δ98/95Mo In this study, we examined the fractionations associated with Mo assimilation during nitrate reduction and N2 fixation in cultures of the freshwater cyanobacterium Anabaena variabilis ATCC 29413. Anabaena variabilis is a filamentous heterocystous cyanobacterium. Heterocystous cyanobacteria are relatively rare in the modern oceans; however, several lines of evidence point to shared biochemical pathways for Mo uptake and utilization in marine and freshwater cyanobacteria. Anabaena variabilis utilizes a Fe-Mo dinitrogenase homologous to that of marine cyanobacteria when grown aerobically in the presence of Mo (e.g., Thiel, 1993), and a homologous Mo-dependent nitrate reductase during nitrate utilization (Zahalak ). The nifDK gene encoding for the dinitrogenase (Fe-Mo) protein of A. variabilis clusters together with other cyanobacterial nifDK genes sequenced, including the marine N2-fixing cyanobacterium Trichodesmium sp. (Dominic ). We examined genes for the ModABC high-affinity Mo uptake system in A. variabilis, and demonstrate that these genes similarly cluster together with those of marine N2-fixing cyanobacteria. We then examine fractionations in Mo isotopes during nitrate reduction and N2 fixation in this organism as a first step in quantifying the biological fractionations expected to be produced in aqueous sedimentary systems. Our results indicate that this organism can produce fractionations similar to or larger than those of the soil bacterium Azotobacter vinelandii (as large as −1.0‰), particularly when fixing N2 under growth conditions when N is the only limiting nutrient. Furthermore, these fractionations vary both with the N source utilized and with the growth phase sampled (for N2 fixation), indicating a fractionation mechanism (or mechanisms) more complex than a simple kinetic effect during cellular Mo uptake. We utilize a metabolic model of the Mo physiology in a first attempt to elucidate the mechanism(s) for and potential limits of Mo isotope fractionation during biological assimilation.

Methods

ModABC sequence alignments

We compared genes for ModA, the periplasmic Mo-binding protein of the ModABC transport system, from A. variabilis with 53 ModA amino acid sequences that were selected from the NCBI-nonredundant (NCBI-nr) database, including 13 cyanobacterial sequences and representative sequences from a variety of other bacterial taxonomic groups. Bacterial ModA proteins that have been biochemically, genetically, or structurally characterized were included (see Table S1, Supporting information). Some archaeal ModA proteins have been characterized; these sequences were excluded from the tree because they could not be aligned reliably with the bacterial sequences. The sequences were aligned with clustalw and the alignment was manually adjusted. A neighbor-joining phylogenetic tree (Saitou & Nei, 1987) was calculated in MEGA (Tamura ) using the Dayhoff model for amino acid substitution (Schwarz & Dayhoff, 1979), and 500 bootstrap replicates. The predicted amino acid sequence from the A. variabilis fused modBC gene (encoding the other two components of the ModABC transport system) was used in a blastp search (Altschul ) against the NCBI-nr database and the lengths of the alignments were plotted along the A. variabilis ModBC sequence.

Experimental methods

Anabaena variabilis str. ATCC 29413 was grown in a modified version of medium 819, containing the following components per liter of Milli Q H2O: 0.04 g K2HPO4, 0.075 g MgSO4·7H2O, 0.036 g CaCl2·2H2O, 0.02 g Na2CO3, 6 mg citric acid, 1 mg EDTA, and 1 mL of Trace Metal Mix A5 [with 2.86 g H3BO3, 1.81 g MnCl2·4H2O, 0.222 g ZnSO4·7H2O, 0.079 g CuSO4·5H2O, and 49 mg Co(NO)·H2O per liter of Milli Q H2O]. We additionally included 10% fructose as a carbon source to stimulate growth and N2 fixation (Haury & Spiller, 1981). Separate solutions of Na2MoO4·2H2O and Fe-citrate were added to final [Mo] of 1.6 ± 0.1 μm and [Fe] of ∼20 μm, measured by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) (Mo & Fe) and isotope dilution (Mo), as described below. Anabaena variabilis strains in which modBC had been inactivated transported Mo at 10 μm but did not transport Mo at 1 μm (Zahalak ), suggesting that the ModABC transport system is utilized in all of the Mo conditions studied here. For nitrate utilization experiments, NaNO3 was added to an excess nitrate concentration of ∼18 mm. Cultures were prepared using standard aseptic techniques, in acid-washed polycarbonate vessels, and grown in a shaking light box under atmosphere with constant light (∼70 μE m−2 s−1) and optimal pH (7.1) and temperature (33 °C) (e.g., Zahalak ). Stock cultures of nitrate-utilizing and N2-fixing cultures were maintained separately to ensure consistency of nitrogen source. Growth was tracked by optical density measurements at 600 nm and calibrated to counts of individual cells within filaments using a standard DAPI (4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole) staining. Robust growth curves for the organism grown under the conditions of this study were established from growth of over 40 individual cultures prior to experiments. Parallel cultures were analyzed for nitrogenase activity in triplicate, using the standard acetylene-ethylene technique (Dilworth, 1967; Schollhorn & Burris, 1967). Experiments were started by inoculating 2–5% of cells from stationary phase, resulting in a negligible transfer of biomass Mo to the start of the experiment. Four sets of experiments were run in 200–300 mL batches in triplicate with blanks containing medium only. Experiments were processed on a time series after 5 and 6 days (with nitrate) or 6 and 9 days (fixing N2). Select N2 fixation experiments were additionally split for C:N and δ15N ratios, analyzed using a Costech/Thermo-Finnigan Delta Plus XP coupled elemental analyzer, continuous flow, isotope ratio mass spectrometer (EA-CF-IRMS), as described in a companion study (Zerkle ). Controls were processed in a manner identical to experiments. Cells were first concentrated via centrifugation, rinsed several times with Milli Q water and 1 mm EDTA to remove weakly sorbed metals, transferred to Teflon Savillex vials, and digested in ultrapure HNO3 and HF. Cells viewed under light microscopy after centrifugation and rinsing showed no signs of significant lysis. Media were filtered through a pre-sterilized filtration apparatus and acidified with ultrapure HNO3 and HF. Media and digested cell pellets were initially screened for Mo concentrations by ICP-MS at the Materials Characterization Laboratory at The Pennsylvania State University (estimated uncertainties were ±5% for media and ±10% for cell pellets). Experimental blanks that were treated identically yielded Mo below analytical detection (<0.2 μg). Final total Mo concentrations for processed media and cells were calculated from isotope dilutions (as described below) with an estimated uncertainty of <1%.

Isotope analyses

Samples were processed and analyzed for Mo isotopes at the University of Maryland, following methods outlined in Scheiderich . Select media samples were split and processed separately to ensure internal consistency of methodology. Samples were acidified with concentrated, quartz-distilled HNO3 and weighed in open Teflon Savillex beakers using an evaporation-correction technique. An appropriate quantity of 97Mo–100Mo double spike was added (based on screened concentrations) and weighed by evaporation correction. The samples were then closed and heated on a 90 °C hot plate for ∼6 h to equilibrate the sample and spike Mo. The resulting solution was dried down with concentrated quartz-distilled HCl and ultra-pure HClO4 and re-dissolved in 6 m HCl in preparation for ion-exchange chromatography. A three-column chromatographic separation was used to purify sampn>les. The first and last columns were anion separations using AG 1x8 resin, and an elution sequence modified from Pietruszka . Briefly, the sample was loaded in 6 m HCl, rinsed with 6 m HCl, then 0.01 m HCl/0.1 m HF, and finally Mo was eluted with 1 m HCl. The second column was a cation-exchange separation, using AG 50Wx8, with the sample loaded and eluted in 1.4 m HCl, as described in Scheiderich . Just prior to analysis, the separated Mo was dissolved in an appropriate amount of 2% ultra-pure nitric acid and refluxed. Digestion and column blanks were assessed by passing a known amount of 97Mo spike through the digestion and column separation chemistry, and were typically less than 3 ng, based on repeat analyses. Isotopic measurements were made in static mode using a Nu Instruments (Wrexham, North Wales, UK) multi-collector ICP-MS, using either an Apex IR (Elemental Scientific Inc., Omaha, NE, USA) nebulizer with an uptake rate of ∼50 μL min−1, or a Scott Double Pass Peltier cooled spray chamber with an uptake rate of ∼1 mL min−1. A gain calibration was run each day that measurements were made. After a minimum of 2 h warm-up time, the instrument was tuned to at least 2 V on 98Mo for all measurements. A single measurement consisted of 60 ratios, with a zero cycle at half-mass after every block of 15 ratios. Zirconium and Ru, which overlap the Mo mass spectrum, were monitored on one isotope each (90 and 99, respectively) to ensure that no direct interferences were occurring from these elements. Instrument performance was monitored on a daily basis by repeatedly measuring an in-house Johnson-Matthey Company (London, England) SpecPure® Mo plasma standard (Stock #35758, Lot #013186S), and calculating an internal fractionation factor for 98/95Mo. The fractionation factor was then used to calculate internal fractionation-corrected ratios for 92/95Mo, 97/95Mo, and 100/95Mo. These ratios were then compared, by means of an epsilon calculation, to the ‘accepted value’ for the given ratio. No sample measurements were made until the epsilon value was within ±1 epsilon unit of the accepted value. Raw isotope ratios were deconvoluted using a modified version of the Siebert method. Delta values were calculated by comparing the deconvoluted sample 98/95Mo ratio to the 98/95Mo ratio for an in-house Johnson-Matthey Company SpecPure® Mo plasma standard, using the standard delta notation: δ98Mo = ((98/95Mo sample/98/95Mo standard)−1) × 1000. A fractionation-corrected 98/95Mo ratio for the standard was determined by measuring double-spiked aliquots and reducing the raw ratios. This procedure provides an additional check on long-term instrument performance with respect to Mo isotopes, through comparison of δ98Mo values for the Mo standard. The SpecPure® Mo plasma standard is frequently used in the literature as the standard reference to calculate a delta value for seawater (+2.3‰, Siebert ). Long-term external reproducibility of δ98Mo measurements is based on replicate processing and multiple analyses of two sediment reference materials SDO-1 and New Albany Shale, which have δ98Mo = +0.88 ± 0.19‰, 2σ, n = 54, and +0.31 ± 0.20‰, 2σ, n = 27, respectively. SDO-1 has been measured by other workers (Barling ; Wasylenki ; Poulson Brucker ) and our data compare favorably. Any small differences are likely because of the use of variations in isotopic composition of batches of SpecPure® Mo. Internal precision of ratio measurements is better than ±0.01% (2σ).

Results

The ModA amino acid sequence (encoding for the periplasmic Mo-binding protein of the ModABC transport system) from A. variabilis was aligned with ModA sequences from a variety of microbial species and used to calculate a distance-based phylogenetic tree (Fig. 1). Bootstrap values greater than 70% are shown next to the branches. The A. variabilis ModA (red) groups with very high bootstrap support with other ModA sequences from the Nostocales, a sub-group within the cyanobacterial ModA clade. The other biochemically characterized ModA sequences, including Azotobacter vinelandii (blue lines), clearly group separately from the cyanobacterial sequences, including modern marine N2-fixing cyanobacteria (e.g., Trichodesmium erythraeum IMS101).
Fig. 1

Neighbor-joining tree of ModA proteins. Anabaena variabilis ModA is in red; sequences that have been shown to be Mo-binding proteins are in blue. Fifty-three protein sequences were aligned; bootstrap values (percent of 500 replicates) greater than 70% are shown. The ModA from A. variabilis clearly groups with other cyanobacterial proteins.

Neighbor-joining tree of ModA proteins. pan class="Species">Anabaena variabilis ModA is in red; sequences that have been shown to be Mo-binding proteins are in blue. Fifty-three protein sequences were aligned; bootstrapn> values (percent of 500 replicates) greater than 70% are shown. The ModA from n>an class="Species">A. variabilis clearly groups with other cyanobacterial proteins. The other components of the Mo uptake system include Mod B, the transmembrane component, and ModC, which provides energy on the cytoplasmic side of the membrane. The modBC gene from A. variabilis is a fusion; in most microbes, modB and modC are separate genes. The predicted amino acid sequence of ModBC in A. variabilis was used as the query in a blastp search against the NCBI-nr database. The only species that had open reading frames that aligned with the full-length ModBC protein were either cyanobacterial or algal (Fig. S1, Supporting information). Some cyanobacterial genomes encode genes whose predicted products only align partially with the A. variabilis ModBC sequence. However, most of these genomes also encode a full-length ortholog of ModBC, and the shorter homolog is annotated as a sulfate transporter. Several Firmicutes have orthologs of ModB and ModC, but it is clear that the A. variabilis ModBC sequence aligns with two different open reading frames in all of these species (Fig. S1, Supporting information). Growth curves and N2 fixation rates for A. variabilis are shown in Fig. 2. Note that N2-fixing organisms never reach a true ‘exponential’ growth phase, presumably because growth was limited by the diffusion of N2 into the cells (e.g., Allen & Arnon, 1955), but do exhibit log-linear growth. We refer to this growth phase as ‘exponential’ here in keeping with standard terminology. The cultures then enter a stationary phase, where growth and metabolic activities continue, but very slowly. In these experiments stationary phase occurred when the culture was limited by organic carbon. Identical batch experiments conducted under autotrophic growth conditions continued in accelerated growth for at least 10 days when CO2 was continuously added. Nitrogen fixation rates varied from 0.4 to 0.06 nmoles N2 per cell per minute. N2 fixation continued during early stationary phase, albeit at lower rates (Fig. 2B). No ethylene production was measured in cultures grown with nitrate.
Fig. 2

Composite growth curves (A) and N2 fixation rates (B) for Anabaena variabilis. The experiments reported here were processed and analyzed for isotopes at times indicated by arrows on the plot.

Composite growth curves (A) and pan class="Chemical">N2 fixation rates (B) for n>an class="Species">Anabaena variabilis. The experiments reported here were processed and analyzed for isotopes at times indicated by arrows on the plot. Biomass C:N ratios in n>an class="Chemical">N2-fixing organisms were measured to equal 5.2–6.4, with δ15N values of −1.3 to −2.0‰ relative to atmospheric N2. We calculated higher cellular Mo levels in N2-fixing cultures (from 0.4 to 1.5 fg Mo per cell) than in cultures grown with nitrate (from 0.1 to 0.6 fg Mo per cell) based on measured Mo concentrations in digested cell pellets and cell counts. These cellular Mo levels are similar to Mo levels measured in marine N2-fixers (Tuit ); however, we estimate large errors for these quantities based on the uncertainty associated with cell counts. The measured Mo concentration of the starting media wn>an class="Chemical">as 1.6 ± 0.1 μm. Total masses of Mo processed for isotope analyses of media and cells, in μg, are listed in Table 2. These quantities differ between experiments because different volumes of sample were processed (some samples were split for parallel analyses) but all samples analyzed satisfied mass balance (initial media Mo = final media Mo + cellular Mo).
Table 2

Experimental results. Values of δ98Mo, α, and ε are calculated with equations listed in the text, and given in ‰. Media samples split, processed, and analyzed separately differed by less than long-term analytical reproducibility (<0.2‰)

Expt.N sourceExpt. Duration (days)Momedia (μg)Mocells (μg)Fcellsδ98Momediaδ98Mocellsαcells–mediaεcells–media
BlankNitrate12.6<0.20.14
BlankN215.7<0.20.14, 0.11
1ANitrate523.82.00.080.13, 0.13−0.290.99960−0.40
1BNitrate529.41.80.060.17, 0.15−0.190.99966−0.34
1CNitrate536.30.50.010.07, 0.12−0.110.99981−0.19
Mean ± standard deviation0.99969−0.3 ± 0.1
2ANitrate618.74.10.180.19−0.200.99965−0.35
2BNitrate612.73.10.200.15, 0.25−0.170.99967−0.33
2CNitrate620.22.40.110.07−0.100.99984−0.16
Mean ± standard deviation0.99972−0.3 ± 0.1
3AN2640.94.90.110.47, 0.38−0.570.99906−0.94
3BN2636.81.50.040.29, 0.21−0.540.99923−0.77
3CN2627.14.80.150.37, 0.45−0.660.99901−0.99
Mean ± standard deviation0.99910−0.9 ± 0.1
4AN2926.07.00.210.26, 0.39−0.320.99943−0.57
4BN2925.24.80.160.25, 0.27−0.250.99941−0.59
4CN2918.97.80.290.30−0.120.99965−0.35
Mean ± standard deviation0.99949−0.5 ± 0.1
Experimental results. Values of δ98Mo, α, and ε are calculated with equations listed in the text, and given in ‰. Media samples split, processed, and analyzed separately difpan class="Chemical">fered by less than long-term analytical reproducibility (<0.2‰) Mepan class="Chemical">asurements of δ98Mo for media and cell pellets are also listed in Table 2. We calculated the value of αcells–media, the fractionation factor between media and cells, by solving a derived Rayleigh fractionation equation: Here Fcells is the fraction of total Mo in the cells at sampling (= cellular Mo/(cellular Mo + final media Mo)), and R is the measured isotope ratio in the media or cells as indicated by subscript i, 98/95Mosample/98/95Mostandard. We report isotope fractionations between cells and media as ε values, defined by: This quantity is comparable to the ΔMo (≍δ98Momedia−δ98Mocells) used in previous studies (e.g., Wpan class="Chemical">asylenki ). The results show that cells preferentially accumulated the lighter isotopes of Mo, resulting in ɛcells–media values of −0.2 to −1.0‰ (Table 2). The fractionations were internally consistent within expn>eriments, but varied between expn>eriments with N source utilized and during growth phases for N2 fixation. When utilizing nitrate as an N source, fractionations of −0.3 ± 0.1‰ (mean ± standard deviation between experiments) were consistently observed. During N2 fixation, fractionations of −0.9 ± 0.1‰ were observed during exponential growth, while fractionations of −0.5 ± 0.1‰ were observed during stationary phase. A similar growth dependence for fractionation was also reported for an N2-fixing marine cyanobacterium (Nägler ).

Discussion

The −0.2 to −1.0‰ fractionations produced in experiments with A. variabilis extend the magnitude of biological Mo fractionations previously reported for a soil bacterium (Liermann ; Wn>an class="Chemical">asylenki ) and a marine cyanobacterium (Nägler ) (Table 1). Although the data is very limited, these fractionations also vary between the nitrogen metabolisms tested and with growth phase during N2 fixation. Previous workers have attributed biological Mo isotope fractionations to (i) coordination changes during uptake with a chelating ligand; (ii) sorption of Mo to the cell surface; or (iii) a simpn>le kinetic isotope effect associated with irreversible Mo transport (Liermann ; Wasylenki ). The strain of A. variabilis examined here is not known to produce any metal-scavenging ligands, though a similar strain (PCC 7937) can produce a high-affinity siderophore for Fe scavenging under Fe-depleted conditions (Kerry ). Furthermore, all experiments in this study were conducted under Fe- and Mo-replete conditions, when no ligand production would be expected to occur. We therefore consider coordination changes during uptake with a secreted chelating ligand an unlikely source of the fractionations. We rinsed the cells with EDTA to remove weakly sorbed metals, but it is nonetheless possible that significant amounts of Mo could have sorbed to Fe- and/or Mn-oxides precipitates if they were present on cell walls (Tovar-Sanchez ). However, the fractionations are inversely correlated with culture density (Fig. 2; Table 2), which is inconsistent with an adsorption mechanism for fractionation. Finally, a single kinetic isotope effect associated with Mo transport would not differ between nitrogen metabolisms, because the high-affinity Mo transporter ModABC is utilized during all conditions tested here, including both nitrate reduction and N2 fixation (Zahalak ). Instead, the pattern in δ98Mo fractionations we observe suggests a more complex mechanism or mechanisms for fractionation. This mechanism has to explain the differences in fractionations produced with different N sources and with progressive growth during N2 fixation. To explore the possible mechanism(s) for Mo isotope fractionation we constructed a reaction network model of the cyanobacterial Mo metabolism based on the biochemical pathways for Mo utilization during nitrate reduction and N2 fixation. This is a common approach that has been used to examine biological fractionations in many different isotope systems, including carbon, nitrogen, and sulfur (e.g., Harrison & Thode, 1958; Rees, 1973; Cypionka ; Brunner & Bernasconi, 2005; Johnston ; Canfield ; Farquhar ) and has been reviewed in detail in several recent studies (Comstock, 2001; Hayes, 2001; Fry, 2003). The biochemical pathways for Mo uptake, storage, and enzymatic incorporation can be represented by the following simple reaction network: where the parentheses represent the cell wall, Moext is the external (media) molybdate pool, Moint is the internal molybdate pool, Mostored is the pool of Mo bound to storage proteins (e.g., MoO42− bound to Mop proteins in freshwater and coastal cyanobacteria; Thiel ; Glass ), and Moenz is the pool of Mo bound to enzymes (nitrate reductase or dinitrogenase in this case). Each numbered arrow represents the flow of Mo from one pool to another, and fractionation of isotopes between the two pools can occur along each of the pathways (with a fractionation factor, α). In this model, pathway 1 represents transport of Mo into the cell, pathway 2 represents the loss of Mo from the cell, pathway 3 represents binding of Mo to storage proteins, pathway 4 represents release of Mo from storage proteins, and pathway 5 represents incorporation of Mo into enzymes. In this model we assume a steady-state, whereby the isotope values of Mo inside the cell are set by the relative proportions of Mo uptake, loss from the cell, storage, and incorporation into enzymes. The Mo isotope values for stored Mo and enzymatically-incorporated Mo can be calculated with a series of mass balance equations, as presented in the Supporting information. The fractionations associated with each of these pathways have not been directly measured. However, we can make some estimates based on theoretical models of isotope effects produced during coordination changes in Mo species. Tossel (2005) used quantum mechanical calculations to estimate isotope fractionation equilibrium constants for a number of Mo compounds, suggesting fractionation factors of 0.9979–0.9985 between tetrahedrally-bound Mo in MoO42− to octahedrally-bound Mo in Mo(OH)6. We used the mean from these calculations to approximate a fractionation factor of α5 = 0.9982 for the coordination change associated with binding of Mo from tetrahedrally-coordinated molybdate into the nitrate reductase and dinitrogenase enzymes, where it is bound in octahedral coordination (Burgess & Lowe, 1996; Hille, 1996; Moura ). Both ModA (the periplasmic Mo-binding protein) and Mop (the Mo-binding storage protein found in some coastal and freshwater cyanobacteria) bind Mo as molybdate, without a change in coordination (Wagner ; Thiel ; Schüttelkopf ; Zahalak ; Masters ). We therefore initially assumed no fractionation during Mo transport into and out of the cell or during storage and release of molybdate (α1, α2, α3, α4 = 1). We tested the impact of including fractionations during Mo uptake and storage, as discussed below. Model parameters and assumptions are listed in the Supporting information. The results of the model are illustrated in Fig. 3, plotted as ɛcells–media vs. the proportion of the stored Mo pool that is incorporated into enzymes ( fenz, numerically representing the relative mass flow of Mo along pathway 5 compared to mass flow of Mo along pathway 5 + pathway 4; see Supporting information). The contours on the plots represent the distribution of the measured cellular Mo between enzymes and storage proteins, such that at the 100% contour all of the cellular Mo is in enzymes, and at the 0% contour all of the cellular Mo is in storage proteins. This figure demonstrates how transport and storage, enzymatic incorporation, and the intracellular distribution of Mo could all contribute to biological fractionations. The fractionation factor associated with Mo uptake, α1, sets the upper limit for 100% incorporation of stored Mo into enzymes (set to 1 in Fig. 3A and at 0.9995 in Fig. 3B). This is because if the stored Mo pool is quantitatively incorporated into enzymes, then no isotopic fractionation is expressed from the enzymatic incorporation step. As smaller proportions of the stored Mo pool are enzymatically incorporated ( fenz), expression of the fractionation associated with the incorporation step increases, and as a consequence the cumulative fractionation is larger. The fractionation factor associated with storage of Mo, α3, has a similar effect on the model as α1, and in the absence of a fractionation during uptake will define the upper bound for fenz = 1. If fractionations are assigned for both uptake and storage, the predicted cumulative fractionations are much larger (resulting in cellular δ98Mo values down to −2.8‰ for α1 and α3 values set to 0.9995; not shown).
Fig. 3

Values calculated with a reaction network model for ɛcells–media versus fenz, as defined in the text (see text and Supporting information for derivation of model and model parameters). The contours represent the proportion of total cellular Mo (the quantity analyzed) that was enzyme-bound (assuming total cellular Mo = enzyme-bound Mo + Mo present in storage proteins). (A) Illustrates a model with no fractionation during Mo transport, (B) is a model including a 0.5‰ fractionation during Mo transport (see text and Supporting information).

Values calculated with a reaction network model for ɛcells–media versus fenz, n>an class="Chemical">as defined in the text (see text and Supporting information for derivation of model and model parameters). The contours represent the proportion of total cellular Mo (the quantity analyzed) that was enzyme-bound (assuming total cellular Mo = enzyme-bound Mo + Mo present in storage proteins). (A) Illustrates a model with no fractionation during Mo transport, (B) is a model including a 0.5‰ fractionation during Mo transport (see text and Supporting information). This model could explain the difference in fractionations between nitrate-utilizing and N2-fixing experiments, as well as the change in fractionations with growth stage during N2 fixation. In this scenario, larger fractionations would be generated during N2 fixation than during nitrate utilization because a smaller proportion of the stored Mo would be incorporated into enzymes during N2 fixation than during nitrate utilization. Likewise, more of the stored Mo pool would be incorporated into enzymes during stationary phase than during exponential growth when fixing N2. This result may seem counter-intuitive; however, at steady state fenz is independent of the size of the stored Mo pool, and therefore these results could simply indicate an increase in the storage of Mo during N2 fixation and during exponential growth. This result is consistent with a higher cellular Mo content in A. variabilis during N2 fixation, and with high levels of Mo storage during N2 fixation estimated for another freshwater heterocystous cyanobacterium, Nostoc sp. PCC 7120 (Glass ). This exercise demonstrates how a metabolic model can be utilized to constrain fractionation processes and examine the flow of Mo through bacterial metabolisms. However, significant questions remain about the fractionations associated with Mo transport and storage in this and other organisms. For exampn>le, Azotobacter vinelandii utilizes a ModA periplasmic Mo-binding protein that is less similar to the Mo-binding proteins of freshwater and marine cyanobacteria (Zahalak ; Fig. 1). This organism also has a rare Mo storage system (MoSto), which stores Mo as Mo-oxide aggregates (Pienkos & Brill, 1981; Fenske ; Schemberg , 2008), rather than as molybdate in the Mop system (Wagner ; Schüttelkopf ; Masters ). Changes in fractionations associated with uptake and storage by these different systems could account for the differences in fractionations between A. variabilis and Azotobacter vinelandii (Table 1). Additional measurements of fractionations produced during Mo uptake in other organisms (e.g., marine cyanobacteria) and under variable environmental conditions (e.g., at lowered Mo concentrations) will test this model and inform future models, as will a more detailed understanding of the biochemistry of Mo uptake and storage in cyanobacteria.

Geobiological Significance

We have demonstrated that cyanobacterial assimilation of Mo can produce large fractionations in δ98Mo (ɛcells–media as large as −1‰), particularly during growth when nitrogen is the only limiting nutrient (such as could occur during bloom events in natural systems). These fractionations are comparable to those produced by other sedimentary processes, and could produce δ98Mo values that overlap with those of Mo in sedimentary organic matter deposited in anoxic settings (Fig. 4). Marine N2-fixing cyanobacteria utilize proteins homologous to the freshwater organism tested here for Mo uptake (Fig. 1) and N2 fixation (Dominic ), though Mo storage proteins such as Mop have not been found in marine cyanobacteria (see review in Glass ). Unless the primary fractionation is associated with storage and release of Mo from the Mop protein (which is unlikely to be the case because it binds Mo as molybdate, see Discussion above), these organisms should be able to produce fractionations of a similar magnitude. If this is the case, then N2-fixing cyanobacteria could provide an important source of isotopically-light Mo bound to organic matter in sedimentary environments, particularly in anoxic (non-sulfidic) settings. The spatial distribution of marine N2 fixation is tightly coupled to anoxic regions of N loss via nitrification and anaerobic oxidation of ammonia (anammox) (Deutsch ). Nitrogen fixation in the modern oceans appears to be enhanced in surface waters above oxygen minimum zones, such as above the eastern tropical north Pacific and in the Arabian Sea (Brandes ; Deutsch ). The smaller fractionations associated with nitrate uptake and very slow growth (i.e., stationary phase) during N2 fixation might then be more common in open-ocean environments, where organisms are frequently faced with starvation conditions and enter intermittent periods of no growth or very slow growth.
Fig. 4

The δ98Mo values measured in some natural samples (from Barling ; Siebert ; Arnold ; Barling & Anbar, 2004; Nägler ; Poulson ; Siebert ; Archer & Vance, 2008; Nakagawa ; Wasylenki ; Goldberg ; Gordon ; this study). Values from this study include cellular Mo measured in cyanobacteria utilizing nitrate (NO3−) and fixing N2 (N fix). Anoxic and Eux (euxinic) values are from modern sediments deposited under anoxic conditions, either with sulfide confined to porewaters (anoxic) or with free sulfide in the water column (euxinic). Experimental results (for Mo sorbed to Mn- and Fe-oxides and for cellular Mo from this study) were normalized to modern seawater values to reflect the range in δ98Mo that might be expected in natural systems.

The δ98Mo values measured in some natural sampn>les (from Barling ; Siebert ; Arnold ; Barling & Anbar, 2004; Nägler ; n>an class="Chemical">Poulson ; Siebert ; Archer & Vance, 2008; Nakagawa ; Wasylenki ; Goldberg ; Gordon ; this study). Values from this study include cellular Mo measured in cyanobacteria utilizing nitrate (NO3−) and fixing N2 (N fix). Anoxic and Eux (euxinic) values are from modern sediments deposited under anoxic conditions, either with sulfide confined to porewaters (anoxic) or with free sulfide in the water column (euxinic). Experimental results (for Mo sorbed to Mn- and Fe-oxides and for cellular Mo from this study) were normalized to modern seawater values to reflect the range in δ98Mo that might be expected in natural systems. Molybdenum associated with N2-fixing cyanobacteria could have provided a source of 98Mo-depleted Mo in ancient sedimentary organic matter as well. Cyanobacteria likely developed a biochemical mechanism for Mo utilization and N2 fixation similar to that of modern organisms very early in Earth history (Glass ). Dinitrogenase is found in diverse micro-organisms distributed across both prokaryotic domains (Young, 1992; Zehr ; Zehr & Turner, 2001), and shows a high degree of conservation of structure, function, and amino acid sequence (Dean & Jacobson, 1992), indicating an ancient origin (Raymond ). Some researchers have suggested that the alternative dinitrogenases preceded the Mo-containing enzyme in ancient Mo-depleted oceans (Anbar & Knoll, 2002; Raymond ; Glass ). Experimental investigations of Mo requirements during N2 fixation indicate that nitrogen fixation rates in organisms utilizing the Fe-Mo dinitrogenase are only hindered at Mo concentrations lower than about 5% of modern marine concentrations (Zerkle ; Glass ). Recent studies of Mo in black shales indicates that the marine Mo reservoir could have been as large as 10–20% of that of the modern ocean, making Mo-dependent nitrogen fixation a feasible process as early as 2.2 Ga (Scott ). Alternatively, the Mo dinitrogenase could have evolved in association with enhanced delivery of Mo to the oceans during transient oxygenation events as early as ∼2.5 Ga (e.g., Anbar ). Certainly the biochemistry of N2 fixation and Mo utilization would have been well-established by ∼551 million years ago, when atmospheric O2 was near modern levels and Mo concentrations in the oceans were likely similar to that of today (Scott ). Studies of carbon and nitrogen isotopes of organic matter and biomarkers in numerous black shales deposited during expanded periods of ocean anoxia during the Phanerozoic (termed oceanic anoxic events, OAEs) indicate that N2-fixing cyanobacteria were the primary contributors of organic matter in these sediments (Chicarelli ; Ohkouchi , 2006; Sachs & Repeta, 1999; Kuypers ; Junium & Arthur, 2007; Karakitsios ; Kashiyama ; Meyers ). N2 fixation was presumably enhanced during Phanerozoic OAEs because of the near complete removal of fixed N by denitrification and anammox along with increased phosphate availability from preferential release of P from anoxic sediments (Sachs & Repeta, 1999; Kuypers ; Junium & Arthur, 2007). Some, but not all, of these black shales exhibit evidence of euxinic water column conditions during deposition (Sinninghe Damste & Koester, 1998; Joachimski ; Pancost ). Other Phanerozoic shales show evidence for deposition under suboxic, or under intermittently euxinic to suboxic conditions (e.g., Gordon ). The fractionations in δ98Mo we measure during Mo uptake in N2-fixing cyanobacteria overlap with fractionations observed in modern anoxic (non-sulfidic) systems and in anoxic Phanerozoic sediments (Fig. 4). This correlation suggests that cyanobacteria could be an important contributor to this Mo isotope signal, particularly when separate lines of evidence point to a significant organic matter contribution from cyanobacteria fixing N2.
  45 in total

Review 1.  New perspectives on nitrogen-fixing microorganisms in tropical and subtropical oceans.

Authors:  J P Zehr; E J Carpenter; T A Villareal
Journal:  Trends Microbiol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 17.079

2.  Steady-state isotopic fractionation in branched pathways using plant uptake of NO3- as an example.

Authors:  J P Comstock
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.116

3.  Biogeochemistry. The nitrogen fix.

Authors:  J F Kasting; J L Siefert
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-07-05       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Structural Basis of Biological Nitrogen Fixation.

Authors:  James B. Howard; Douglas C. Rees
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  1996-11-07       Impact factor: 60.622

5.  The Mononuclear Molybdenum Enzymes.

Authors:  Russ Hille
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  1996-11-07       Impact factor: 60.622

6.  Oligotrophy and nitrogen fixation during eastern mediterranean sapropel events

Authors: 
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-12-24       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Unicellular cyanobacteria fix N2 in the subtropical North Pacific Ocean.

Authors:  J P Zehr; J B Waterbury; P J Turner; J P Montoya; E Omoregie; G F Steward; A Hansen; D M Karl
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-08-09       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Effect on heterocyst differentiation of nitrogen fixation in vegetative cells of the cyanobacterium Anabaena variabilis ATCC 29413.

Authors:  T Thiel; B Pratte
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 3.490

9.  Carbon and nitrogen isotopic compositions of alkyl porphyrins from the Triassic Serpiano oil shale.

Authors:  M I Chicarelli; J M Hayes; B N Popp; C B Eckardt; J R Maxwell
Journal:  Geochim Cosmochim Acta       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 5.010

10.  Structure of the molybdate/tungstate binding protein mop from Sporomusa ovata.

Authors:  U G Wagner; E Stupperich; C Kratky
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2000-11-15       Impact factor: 5.006

View more
  1 in total

1.  Molybdenum limitation of microbial nitrogen assimilation in aquatic ecosystems and pure cultures.

Authors:  Jennifer B Glass; Richard P Axler; Sudeep Chandra; Charles R Goldman
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2012-09-13       Impact factor: 5.640

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.