| Literature DB >> 21092069 |
A L Zerkle1, K Scheiderich, J A Maresca, L J Liermann, S L Brantley.
Abstract
We measured the δ⁹⁸Mo of cells and media fromEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2010 PMID: 21092069 PMCID: PMC3627308 DOI: 10.1111/j.1472-4669.2010.00262.x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Geobiology ISSN: 1472-4669 Impact factor: 4.407
Compilation of previous studies of biological Mo isotope fractionations (in ‰), along with this study (± analytical or given 2σ). Also shown are the N source, initial [Mo] (when reported), Mo source (glass or aqueous Mo), growth phase (as reported), and the number of individual analyses reported (not including duplicates) (n)
| Organism | Type | N source | [Mo], source | Growth phase | δ98Mo fractionation | Ref. | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | Marine cyanobacterium | N2 | Not given, [Mo]aq | Early, late | −0.5, −0.1 ± 0.1 | 2 | 1 |
| | Soil bacterium | NH3 | 1.5 μ | Not given | −0.8 ± 0.4 | 5 | 2 |
| | Soil bacterium | NH3, N2 | ∼1 μ | Not given | −0.5 ± 0.2 | 11 | 3 |
| Fw cyanobacterium | NO3− | 1.6 μ | Late exp., stationary | −0.3, −0.3 ± 0.2 | 7 | 4 | |
| Fw cyanobacterium | N2 | 1.7 μ | Exp., stationary | −0.9, −0.5 ± 0.2 | 7 | 4 |
1, Nägler (reported only in an abstract from conference proceedings); 2, Liermann ; 3, Wasylenki , 4. This study
Values converted from δ97/95Mo to δ98/95Mo, assuming δ97/95Mo ∼ 2/3 δ98/95Mo
Fig. 1Neighbor-joining tree of ModA proteins. Anabaena variabilis ModA is in red; sequences that have been shown to be Mo-binding proteins are in blue. Fifty-three protein sequences were aligned; bootstrap values (percent of 500 replicates) greater than 70% are shown. The ModA from A. variabilis clearly groups with other cyanobacterial proteins.
Fig. 2Composite growth curves (A) and N2 fixation rates (B) for Anabaena variabilis. The experiments reported here were processed and analyzed for isotopes at times indicated by arrows on the plot.
Experimental results. Values of δ98Mo, α, and ε are calculated with equations listed in the text, and given in ‰. Media samples split, processed, and analyzed separately differed by less than long-term analytical reproducibility (<0.2‰)
| Expt. | N source | Expt. Duration (days) | Momedia (μg) | Mocells (μg) | δ98Momedia | δ98Mocells | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blank | Nitrate | 12.6 | <0.2 | 0.14 | |||||
| Blank | N2 | 15.7 | <0.2 | 0.14, 0.11 | |||||
| 1A | Nitrate | 5 | 23.8 | 2.0 | 0.08 | 0.13, 0.13 | −0.29 | 0.99960 | −0.40 |
| 1B | Nitrate | 5 | 29.4 | 1.8 | 0.06 | 0.17, 0.15 | −0.19 | 0.99966 | −0.34 |
| 1C | Nitrate | 5 | 36.3 | 0.5 | 0.01 | 0.07, 0.12 | −0.11 | 0.99981 | −0.19 |
| Mean ± standard deviation | 0.99969 | −0.3 ± 0.1 | |||||||
| 2A | Nitrate | 6 | 18.7 | 4.1 | 0.18 | 0.19 | −0.20 | 0.99965 | −0.35 |
| 2B | Nitrate | 6 | 12.7 | 3.1 | 0.20 | 0.15, 0.25 | −0.17 | 0.99967 | −0.33 |
| 2C | Nitrate | 6 | 20.2 | 2.4 | 0.11 | 0.07 | −0.10 | 0.99984 | −0.16 |
| Mean ± standard deviation | 0.99972 | −0.3 ± 0.1 | |||||||
| 3A | N2 | 6 | 40.9 | 4.9 | 0.11 | 0.47, 0.38 | −0.57 | 0.99906 | −0.94 |
| 3B | N2 | 6 | 36.8 | 1.5 | 0.04 | 0.29, 0.21 | −0.54 | 0.99923 | −0.77 |
| 3C | N2 | 6 | 27.1 | 4.8 | 0.15 | 0.37, 0.45 | −0.66 | 0.99901 | −0.99 |
| Mean ± standard deviation | 0.99910 | −0.9 ± 0.1 | |||||||
| 4A | N2 | 9 | 26.0 | 7.0 | 0.21 | 0.26, 0.39 | −0.32 | 0.99943 | −0.57 |
| 4B | N2 | 9 | 25.2 | 4.8 | 0.16 | 0.25, 0.27 | −0.25 | 0.99941 | −0.59 |
| 4C | N2 | 9 | 18.9 | 7.8 | 0.29 | 0.30 | −0.12 | 0.99965 | −0.35 |
| Mean ± standard deviation | 0.99949 | −0.5 ± 0.1 |
Fig. 3Values calculated with a reaction network model for ɛcells–media versus fenz, as defined in the text (see text and Supporting information for derivation of model and model parameters). The contours represent the proportion of total cellular Mo (the quantity analyzed) that was enzyme-bound (assuming total cellular Mo = enzyme-bound Mo + Mo present in storage proteins). (A) Illustrates a model with no fractionation during Mo transport, (B) is a model including a 0.5‰ fractionation during Mo transport (see text and Supporting information).
Fig. 4The δ98Mo values measured in some natural samples (from Barling ; Siebert ; Arnold ; Barling & Anbar, 2004; Nägler ; Poulson ; Siebert ; Archer & Vance, 2008; Nakagawa ; Wasylenki ; Goldberg ; Gordon ; this study). Values from this study include cellular Mo measured in cyanobacteria utilizing nitrate (NO3−) and fixing N2 (N fix). Anoxic and Eux (euxinic) values are from modern sediments deposited under anoxic conditions, either with sulfide confined to porewaters (anoxic) or with free sulfide in the water column (euxinic). Experimental results (for Mo sorbed to Mn- and Fe-oxides and for cellular Mo from this study) were normalized to modern seawater values to reflect the range in δ98Mo that might be expected in natural systems.