Literature DB >> 21091926

Alternatives to routine ultrasound for eligibility assessment prior to early termination of pregnancy with mifepristone-misoprostol.

H Bracken1, W Clark, E S Lichtenberg, S M Schweikert, J Tanenhaus, A Barajas, L Alpert, B Winikoff.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To test the feasibility and efficacy of an approach that foregoes the routine use of ultrasound for the determination of eligibility for medical termination of pregnancy.
DESIGN: Prospective trial.
SETTING: Ten termination of pregnancy clinics in the USA. POPULATION: A total of 4484 women seeking termination of pregnancy with mifepristone-misoprostol.
METHODS: Women provided estimates of the date of their last menstrual period and underwent pelvic bimanual and ultrasound examinations. We compared estimates of gestational age using these three methods. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Proportion of women of ≤9 weeks' gestation by woman or provider estimate, but >9 weeks' gestation by ultrasound.
RESULTS: The reliance on women's report of their last menstrual period together with physical examination to determine their eligibility for termination of pregnancy with mifepristone-misoprostol would result in few women (63/4008 or 1.6%) accepted for treatment outside the current limits of standard mifepristone-misoprostol regimens used for early termination of pregnancy (i.e. ≤63 days' gestation on ultrasound).
CONCLUSIONS: Last menstrual period and physical examination alone, without the routine use of ultrasound, are highly effective for the determination of women's eligibility for early termination of pregnancy with mifepristone-misoprostol.
© 2010 The Authors Journal compilation © RCOG 2010 BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21091926     DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02753.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJOG        ISSN: 1470-0328            Impact factor:   6.531


  13 in total

1.  Telemedicine and medical abortion: dispelling safety myths, with facts.

Authors:  Roopan Gill; Wendy V Norman
Journal:  Mhealth       Date:  2018-02-01

Review 2.  Comparative effectiveness, safety and acceptability of medical abortion at home and in a clinic: a systematic review.

Authors:  Thoai D Ngo; Min Hae Park; Haleema Shakur; Caroline Free
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2011-03-04       Impact factor: 9.408

3.  Effectiveness, safety and acceptability of no-test medical abortion (termination of pregnancy) provided via telemedicine: a national cohort study.

Authors:  Ara Aiken; P A Lohr; J Lord; N Ghosh; J Starling
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 7.331

4.  Preterm birth: Case definition & guidelines for data collection, analysis, and presentation of immunisation safety data.

Authors:  Julie-Anne Quinn; Flor M Munoz; Bernard Gonik; Lourdes Frau; Clare Cutland; Tamala Mallett-Moore; Aimee Kissou; Frederick Wittke; Manoj Das; Tony Nunes; Savia Pye; Wendy Watson; Ana-Maria Alguacil Ramos; Jose F Cordero; Wan-Ting Huang; Sonali Kochhar; Jim Buttery
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 3.641

5.  Accuracy of gestational age estimation from last menstrual period among women seeking abortion in South Africa, with a view to task sharing: a mixed methods study.

Authors:  Deborah Constant; Jane Harries; Jennifer Moodley; Landon Myer
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 3.223

Review 6.  A research agenda for moving early medical pregnancy termination over the counter.

Authors:  N Kapp; D Grossman; E Jackson; L Castleman; D Brahmi
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2017-04-27       Impact factor: 6.531

7.  Commentary: No-test medication abortion: A sample protocol for increasing access during a pandemic and beyond.

Authors:  Elizabeth G Raymond; Daniel Grossman; Alice Mark; Ushma D Upadhyay; Gillian Dean; Mitchell D Creinin; Leah Coplon; Jamila Perritt; Jessica M Atrio; DeShawn Taylor; Marji Gold
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2020-04-16       Impact factor: 3.375

8.  Medication for Abortion and Miscarriage in Primary Care: Important and Possible for General Internists.

Authors:  Rachel S Casas; Cynthia H Chuang
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Determination of medical abortion success by women and community health volunteers in Nepal using a symptom checklist.

Authors:  Kathryn L Andersen; Mary Fjerstad; Indira Basnett; Shailes Neupane; Valerie Acre; Sharad Sharma; Emily Jackson
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2018-05-11       Impact factor: 3.007

10.  Early termination of pregnancy: differences in gestational age estimation using last menstrual period and ultrasound in Mexico.

Authors:  Biani Saavedra-Avendano; Raffaela Schiavon; Patricio Sanhueza; Ranulfo Rios-Polanco; Laura Garcia-Martinez; Blair G Darney
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2020-06-09       Impact factor: 3.223

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.