Literature DB >> 21091851

The perspective of patients with haemophilia with inhibitors and their care givers: preferences for treatment characteristics.

T M Brown1, C L Pashos, A V Joshi, W C Lee.   

Abstract

Treatment preferences of haemophilia patients with inhibitors have not been well documented. This study sought to identify treatment attributes that patients/caregivers consider most important in the USA, inasmuch as those preferences may affect patient adherence to treatment plans. A discrete choice experiment was conducted to elicit treatment preferences. Haemophilia patients with inhibitors, or their caregivers on their behalf, completed a written survey that elicited preferences for treatment features and levels synthesized from the medical literature including: risk of viral transmission, rise in inhibitor titre, reduction in thromboembolic events, number of infusions, preparation time, infusion time/volume, time required to stop bleeding/alleviate pain, use of prophylaxis, use of major surgery and medication cost. Relative importance (RI) of preferences was modelled using a multinomial logit function. Most respondents were male (49 of 51, 96.1%); mean age, 20.7 years (SD = 18.8) and 88.5% of patients had haemophilia type A. The three most important patient-identified treatment attributes were as follows: time required to stop bleeding (RI = 19.3), possibility that the level of inhibitor may rise (RI = 14.3) and risk of contracting a virus from the product (RI = 13.5). Haemophilia patients with inhibitors and their caregivers appear to be willing to accept treatments that may be more inconvenient and painful as long as the treatments are effective in quickly controlling bleeds, do not increase inhibitor levels and do not pose a risk for viral contraction. Study findings provide meaningful input to the clinical community from patients and caregivers and support the importance of physicians understanding their patients' treatment preferences.
© 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21091851     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2516.2010.02401.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Haemophilia        ISSN: 1351-8216            Impact factor:   4.287


  9 in total

Review 1.  A descriptive review on methods to prioritize outcomes in a health care context.

Authors:  Inger M Janssen; Ansgar Gerhardus; Milly A Schröer-Günther; Fülöp Scheibler
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2014-08-25       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 2.  Valuing Meta-Health Effects for Use in Economic Evaluations to Inform Reimbursement Decisions: A Review of the Evidence.

Authors:  Richard De Abreu Lourenco; Marion Haas; Jane Hall; Rosalie Viney
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 3.  Discrete choice experiments in health economics: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Michael D Clark; Domino Determann; Stavros Petrou; Domenico Moro; Esther W de Bekker-Grob
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  Patient-reported treatment burden of chronic immune thrombocytopenia therapies.

Authors:  T Michelle Brown; Ruslan V Horblyuk; Kelly M Grotzinger; Axel C Matzdorff; Chris L Pashos
Journal:  BMC Blood Disord       Date:  2012-03-22

Review 5.  Using Best-Worst Scaling to Investigate Preferences in Health Care.

Authors:  Kei Long Cheung; Ben F M Wijnen; Ilene L Hollin; Ellen M Janssen; John F Bridges; Silvia M A A Evers; Mickael Hiligsmann
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 4.981

6.  Examining patient and professional perspectives in the UK for gene therapy in haemophilia.

Authors:  Ione Woollacott; George Morgan; Pratima Chowdary; Jamie O'Hara; Bethany Franks; Eline van Overbeeke; Nicola Dunn; Sissel Michelsen; Isabelle Huys; Antony Martin; Matthew Cawson; Jack Brownrigg; Ian Winburn; Jim Thomson
Journal:  Haemophilia       Date:  2022-04-19       Impact factor: 4.263

7.  The Role of Patients' Age on Their Preferences for Choosing Additional Blood Pressure-Lowering Drugs: A Discrete Choice Experiment in Patients with Diabetes.

Authors:  Sieta T de Vries; Folgerdiena M de Vries; Thijs Dekker; Flora M Haaijer-Ruskamp; Dick de Zeeuw; Adelita V Ranchor; Petra Denig
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-07       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Patient and parent preferences for characteristics of prophylactic treatment in hemophilia.

Authors:  Roberto Furlan; Sangeeta Krishnan; Jeffrey Vietri
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 2.711

Review 9.  Respondent Understanding in Discrete Choice Experiments: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Alison Pearce; Mark Harrison; Verity Watson; Deborah J Street; Kirsten Howard; Nick Bansback; Stirling Bryan
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2020-11-03       Impact factor: 3.883

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.