Literature DB >> 21091574

Inbreeding depression in the competitive fertilization success of male crickets.

L W Simmons1.   

Abstract

Mating between close relatives generally results in offspring of decreased fitness. Inbreeding depression is generally greater for life-history traits than for morphological traits, and recent studies of traits subject to sexual selection suggest that these may suffer the greatest inbreeding depression. Sexual selection continues after mating in the form of sperm competition and cryptic female choice, imposing strong selection on male competitive fertilization success. Here, I examine the effects of a single generation of full-sib mating on competitive fertilization success in a cricket, Teleogryllus oceanicus. The estimated coefficient of inbreeding depression in competitive fertilization success was 0.37, higher than that for other life-history and morphological traits. Such intense inbreeding depression coupled with little or no additive genetic variance for this trait is consistent with strong directional selection on male competitive fertilization success generating high levels of dominance variance, and provides an adaptive explanation for the evolution of inbreeding avoidance found in this species.
© 2010 The Author. Journal of Evolutionary Biology © 2010 European Society For Evolutionary Biology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21091574     DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2010.02179.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Evol Biol        ISSN: 1010-061X            Impact factor:   2.411


  13 in total

1.  Differential allocation in a lekking bird: females lay larger eggs and are more likely to have male chicks when they mate with less related males.

Authors:  Rebecca J Sardell; Emily H DuVal
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Offspring fitness varies with parental extra-pair status in song sparrows, Melospiza melodia.

Authors:  Rebecca J Sardell; Peter Arcese; Jane M Reid
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Rapid range expansion is not restricted by inbreeding in a sexually cannibalistic spider.

Authors:  Stefanie M Zimmer; Henrik Krehenwinkel; Jutta M Schneider
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Pattern of inbreeding depression, condition dependence, and additive genetic variance in Trinidadian guppy ejaculate traits.

Authors:  Clelia Gasparini; Alessandro Devigili; Ryan Dosselli; Andrea Pilastro
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 2.912

5.  Generation-based life table analysis reveals manifold effects of inbreeding on the population fitness in Plutella xylostella.

Authors:  Lu Peng; Mingmin Zou; Nana Ren; Miao Xie; Liette Vasseur; Yifan Yang; Weiyi He; Guang Yang; Geoff M Gurr; Youming Hou; Shijun You; Minsheng You
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-07-31       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Heat stress but not inbreeding affects offensive sperm competitiveness in Callosobruchus maculatus.

Authors:  Emile Lieshout; Joseph L Tomkins; Leigh W Simmons
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 2.912

7.  Inbreeding reveals mode of past selection on male reproductive characters in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Outi Ala-Honkola; David J Hosken; Mollie K Manier; Stefan Lüpold; Elizabeth M Droge-Young; Kirstin S Berben; William F Collins; John M Belote; Scott Pitnick
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2013-06-03       Impact factor: 2.912

8.  Adult nutrition, but not inbreeding, affects male primary sexual traits in the leaf-footed cactus bug Narnia femorata (Hemiptera: Coreidae).

Authors:  Paul N Joseph; Daniel A Sasson; Pablo E Allen; Ummat Somjee; Christine W Miller
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 2.912

9.  Telomere length reveals cumulative individual and transgenerational inbreeding effects in a passerine bird.

Authors:  Kat Bebbington; Lewis G Spurgin; Eleanor A Fairfield; Hannah L Dugdale; Jan Komdeur; Terry Burke; David S Richardson
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2016-05-17       Impact factor: 6.185

10.  Feed-backs among inbreeding, inbreeding depression in sperm traits, and sperm competition can drive evolution of costly polyandry.

Authors:  Greta Bocedi; Jane M Reid
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 3.694

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.