Literature DB >> 21091166

Contraceptive use and behavior in the 21st century: a comprehensive study across five European countries.

S O Skouby1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The choice of currently available contraceptive methods has increased considerably in recent years, offering women of reproductive age a variety of different methods dependent on their needs and lifestyle. In order to determine the pattern of use of current methods in contraception, a survey was conducted in a large population of women drawn from five European countries (France, Germany, Italy, Spain and the United Kingdom).
METHOD: More than 12,000 randomly selected women, aged 15-49 years, were interviewed using a standardized questionnaire which addressed the use of current methods of contraception. The responses were analyzed for the total study population, and, where appropriate, by country and age.
RESULTS: An oral contraceptive (OC) was confirmed as the most widely used method of contraception for women in the European study population, with an estimated 22 million users in the five countries. Women using an OC reported very high levels of satisfaction (>90%). Male and female sterilization were the main methods of contraception in women aged 40 years and older. One-half of the women had undergone their sterilization before the age of 35 years. More than 50% of the women who had undergone sterilization had not been adequately informed and counselled about alternative reversible contraceptive options. No method of contraception was being used currently by 23% of the European study population, and unreliable methods of contraception (including cap/diaphragm, chemical, and natural and withdrawal methods) were being used by a further 6% of the population. Although valid reasons (e.g. not in a sexual relationship, wish to become pregnant) were given by many women who were not using contraception, there still remains a large number of women who need counselling regarding the importance of using reliable contraceptive methods. The number of women aged 15-49 years in the five European countries who are considered at risk of an unwanted pregnancy is estimated to be 4.7 million (6.5%).
CONCLUSIONS: Differences in the use pattern of contraceptive methods were demonstrated that emphasize the social and cultural differences between the countries. The findings in the current study can be used as a baseline from which to monitor trends in contraceptive use and behavior in subsequent studies.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 21091166     DOI: 10.3109/13625187.2010.533002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care        ISSN: 1362-5187            Impact factor:   1.848


  14 in total

1.  Hormonal contraception--what kind, when, and for whom?

Authors:  Inka Wiegratz; Christian J Thaler
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2011-07-18       Impact factor: 5.594

2.  Factors associated with postpartum use of long-acting reversible contraception.

Authors:  Titilope Oduyebo; Lauren B Zapata; Maegan E Boutot; Naomi K Tepper; Kathryn M Curtis; Denise V D'Angelo; Polly A Marchbanks; Maura K Whiteman
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2019-03-15       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 3.  Budd-Chiari syndrome/hepatic venous outflow tract obstruction.

Authors:  Dominique-Charles Valla
Journal:  Hepatol Int       Date:  2017-07-06       Impact factor: 6.047

Review 4.  Hormonal contraception in women with migraine: is progestogen-only contraception a better choice?

Authors:  Rossella E Nappi; Gabriele S Merki-Feld; Erica Terreno; Alice Pellegrinelli; Michele Viana
Journal:  J Headache Pain       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 7.277

5.  Estimation of dietary iron bioavailability from food iron intake and iron status.

Authors:  Jack R Dainty; Rachel Berry; Sean R Lynch; Linda J Harvey; Susan J Fairweather-Tait
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-30       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Trends in gynecologic cancer mortality in East Asian regions.

Authors:  Jung-Yun Lee; Eun-Yang Kim; Kyu-Won Jung; Aesun Shin; Karen K L Chan; Daisuke Aoki; Jae-Weon Kim; Jeffrey J H Low; Young-Joo Won
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 4.401

7.  Attitudes of women towards products containing hormones (hormonal contraceptives or hormone therapy): what changes from pre to postmenopause?

Authors:  Giovanni Grandi; Maria Chiara Del Savio; Valentina Boggio Sola; Francesca Monari; Chiara Melotti; Fabio Facchinetti
Journal:  Ann Med       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 4.709

8.  Women's perceptions and reasons for choosing the pill, patch, or ring in the CHOICE study: a cross-sectional survey of contraceptive method selection after counseling.

Authors:  Christian Egarter; Brigitte Frey Tirri; Johannes Bitzer; Vyacheslav Kaminskyy; Björn J Oddens; Vera Prilepskaya; Arie Yeshaya; Maya Marintcheva-Petrova; Steven Weyers
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 2.809

9.  Combined oral contraception and obesity are strong predictors of low-grade inflammation in healthy individuals: results from the Danish Blood Donor Study (DBDS).

Authors:  Cecilie J Sørensen; Ole B Pedersen; Mikkel S Petersen; Erik Sørensen; Sebastian Kotzé; Lise W Thørner; Henrik Hjalgrim; Andreas S Rigas; Bjarne Møller; Klaus Rostgaard; Mads Riiskjær; Henrik Ullum; Christian Erikstrup
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-06       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  International survey to assess women's attitudes regarding choice of daily versus nondaily female hormonal contraception.

Authors:  Diana Mansour
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2014-04-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.