Literature DB >> 21088844

Patients with IDH1 wild type anaplastic astrocytomas exhibit worse prognosis than IDH1-mutated glioblastomas, and IDH1 mutation status accounts for the unfavorable prognostic effect of higher age: implications for classification of gliomas.

Christian Hartmann1, Bettina Hentschel, Wolfgang Wick, David Capper, Jörg Felsberg, Matthias Simon, Manfred Westphal, Gabriele Schackert, Richard Meyermann, Torsten Pietsch, Guido Reifenberger, Michael Weller, Markus Loeffler, Andreas von Deimling.   

Abstract

WHO grading of human brain tumors extends beyond a strictly histological grading system by providing a basis predictive for the clinical behavior of the respective neoplasm. For example, patients with glioblastoma WHO grade IV usually show a less favorable clinical course and receive more aggressive first-line treatment than patients with anaplastic astrocytoma WHO grade III. Here we provide evidence that the IDH1 status is more prognostic for overall survival than standard histological criteria that differentiate high-grade astrocytomas. We sequenced the isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 gene (IDH1) at codon 132 in 382 patients with anaplastic astrocytoma and glioblastoma from the NOA-04 trial and from a prospective translational cohort study of the German Glioma Network. Patients with anaplastic astrocytomas carried IDH1 mutations in 60%, and patients with glioblastomas in 7.2%. IDH1 was the most prominent single prognostic factor (RR 2.7; 95% CI 1.6-4.5) followed by age, diagnosis and MGMT. The sequence from more favorable to poorer outcome was (1) anaplastic astrocytoma with IDH1 mutation, (2) glioblastoma with IDH1 mutation, (3) anaplastic astrocytoma without IDH1 mutation and (4) glioblastoma without IDH1 mutation (p < 0.0001). In this combined set of anaplastic astrocytomas and glioblastomas both, IDH1 mutation and IDH1 expression status were of greater prognostic relevance than histological diagnosis according to the current WHO classification system. Our data indicate that much of the prognostic significance of patient age is due to the predominant occurrence of IDH1 mutations in younger patients. Immunohistochemistry using a mutation-specific antibody recognizing the R132H mutation yielded similar results. We propose to complement the current WHO classification and grading of high-grade astrocytic gliomas by the IDH1 mutation status and to use this combined histological and molecular classification in future clinical trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21088844     DOI: 10.1007/s00401-010-0781-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Neuropathol        ISSN: 0001-6322            Impact factor:   17.088


  281 in total

1.  Anaplastic glioma.

Authors:  Nina A Paleologos; Ryan T Merrell
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Neurol       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 3.598

2.  Nuclear karyopherin a2: a novel biomarker for infiltrative astrocytomas.

Authors:  K Gousias; A J Becker; M Simon; P Niehusmann
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2012-07-07       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 3.  Non-invasive metabolic imaging of brain tumours in the era of precision medicine.

Authors:  Michelle M Kim; Abhijit Parolia; Mark P Dunphy; Sriram Venneti
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 4.  G protein-coupled receptors as oncogenic signals in glioma: emerging therapeutic avenues.

Authors:  A E Cherry; N Stella
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2014-08-24       Impact factor: 3.590

5.  Neurocognitive function varies by IDH1 genetic mutation status in patients with malignant glioma prior to surgical resection.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Wefel; Kyle R Noll; Ganesh Rao; Daniel P Cahill
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 12.300

6.  Recurrent glioblastomas in the elderly after maximal first-line treatment: does preserved overall condition warrant a maximal second-line treatment?

Authors:  Marc Zanello; Alexandre Roux; Renata Ursu; Sophie Peeters; Luc Bauchet; Georges Noel; Jacques Guyotat; Pierre-Jean Le Reste; Thierry Faillot; Fabien Litre; Nicolas Desse; Evelyne Emery; Antoine Petit; Johann Peltier; Jimmy Voirin; François Caire; Jean-Luc Barat; Jean-Rodolphe Vignes; Philippe Menei; Olivier Langlois; Edouard Dezamis; Antoine Carpentier; Phong Dam Hieu; Philippe Metellus; Johan Pallud
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 4.130

7.  Diagnostic discrepancies in malignant astrocytoma due to limited small pathological tumor sample can be overcome by IDH1 testing.

Authors:  Betty Y S Kim; Wen Jiang; Jason Beiko; Sujit S Prabhu; Franco DeMonte; Mark R Gilbert; Raymond Sawaya; Kenneth D Aldape; Daniel P Cahill; Ian E McCutcheon
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 4.130

8.  The advanced development of Cx43 and GAP-43 mediated intercellular networking in IDH1 wildtype diffuse and anaplastic gliomas with lower mitotic rate.

Authors:  Aleksandrs Krigers; Patrizia Moser; Helga Fritsch; Matthias Demetz; Konstantin Brawanski; Claudius Thomé; Christian F Freyschlag
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-06-26       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 9.  Personalized care in neuro-oncology coming of age: why we need MGMT and 1p/19q testing for malignant glioma patients in clinical practice.

Authors:  Michael Weller; Roger Stupp; Monika E Hegi; Martin van den Bent; Joerg C Tonn; Marc Sanson; Wolfgang Wick; Guido Reifenberger
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 12.300

10.  Stereotactic iodine-125 brachytherapy for the treatment of WHO grades II and III gliomas located in the central sulcus region.

Authors:  Maximilian I Ruge; Philipp Kickingereder; Stefan Grau; Franziska Dorn; Norbert Galldiks; Harald Treuer; Volker Sturm
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 12.300

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.