Literature DB >> 2108877

Public-sector savings resulting from expenditures for contraceptive services.

J D Forrest1, S Singh.   

Abstract

Almost one in four U.S. women who use a reversible method of contraception rely on a publicly funded source of care, either a family planning clinic or a private physician reimbursed by Medicaid. According to three scenarios of alternative contraceptive use patterns, if publicly funded services were not available, these women would have between 1.2 million and 2.1 million unintended pregnancies over one year--substantially more than the approximately 400,000 they currently experience. If these women relying on publicly funded services were using no method of contraception, they would be expected to have more than 3.5 million unintended pregnancies in one year. In FY 1987, federal and state governments spent $412 million on contraceptive services for women who otherwise might not have been able to obtain them. If these services had not been available, the additional public costs for medical care, welfare and supplementary nutritional programs during the first two years after a birth or for publicly funded abortions would have totaled $1.2-$2.6 billion. These savings represent an average of $4.40 saved for every dollar of public funds spent to provide contraceptive services.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Americas; Contraception; Contraception Failure; Contraceptive Usage; Cost Benefit Analysis; Cost Effectiveness; Delivery Of Health Care; Developed Countries; Economic Factors; Estimation Technics; Evaluation; Evaluation Indexes; Expenditures; Family Planning; Family Planning Programs; Financial Activities; Financing, Government; Government Sponsored Programs; Health; Health Facilities; Macroeconomic Factors; North America; Northern America; Organization And Administration; Outpatient Clinic; Physician's Office; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Outcomes; Programs; Public Sector; Quantitative Evaluation; Reproduction; Research Methodology; Savings; Socioeconomic Factors; United States

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2108877

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Plann Perspect        ISSN: 0014-7354


  6 in total

1.  Trends in the content and use of oral contraceptives in the United States, 1964-88.

Authors:  B B Gerstman; T P Gross; D L Kennedy; R C Bennett; D K Tomita; B V Stadel
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Thoughts on health-care reform: ignored global considerations.

Authors:  H N Beaty
Journal:  Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc       Date:  1994

3.  Expanded state-funded family planning services: estimating pregnancies averted by the Family PACT Program in California, 1997-1998.

Authors:  Diana Greene Foster; Cynthia M Klaisle; Maya Blum; Mary E Bradsberry; Claire D Brindis; Felicia H Stewart
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Reasons for ineffective pre-pregnancy contraception use in patients seeking abortion services.

Authors:  Juell B Homco; Jeffrey F Peipert; Gina M Secura; Vanessa A Lewis; Jenifer E Allsworth
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2009-07-10       Impact factor: 3.375

5.  Return on investment: a fuller assessment of the benefits and cost savings of the US publicly funded family planning program.

Authors:  Jennifer J Frost; Adam Sonfield; Mia R Zolna; Lawrence B Finer
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 4.911

6.  Association of Access to Family Planning Services With Medicaid Expansion Among Female Enrollees in Michigan.

Authors:  Michelle H Moniz; Matthias A Kirch; Erica Solway; Susan D Goold; John Z Ayanian; Edith C Kieffer; Sarah J Clark; Renuka Tipirneni; Jeffrey T Kullgren; Tammy Chang
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2018-08-03
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.